Politics - 15 December 2007

what do you suppose the chance are of a Republican winning the Presidency?

2007-12-15 05:18:33 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean its very possible. Along with those mentioned, like 9/11 Abe Lioncoln and other unsolved deaths. Just watch the movie JFK, and it all seems possible.

2007-12-15 05:00:38 · 13 answers · asked by Italianokid13 2

Instead of relying on other people for support.

The Donner story seems like a metaphor for todays political arena.

2007-12-15 04:54:13 · 8 answers · asked by whirling W dervish 2

Well, is it?

2007-12-15 04:51:52 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-15 04:51:34 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Generic Medication!!!! Remember how fast Rummty rush over to China

Remember how fast the US allow Vietnam to be a trade partner after Vietnam threaten to create their own vaccine

WTO = Trade Related Aspect of Intellectual Property (
TRIP) or Global monopoly of the world's market?

Isn't it sickening that the International Corporations ( including Phamaceutical ) lobby our government to enforce laws (using our US $$$ and military as tools) to make sure developing countries won't develope new drugs and tech. for the poor poeple in the world.

In the TRIP agreement China, Chile, India, Japan and other countries are allow to sell whatever they want in the US so long as they don't create generic products for the poor people in the world = Medicine

and guess who was in charge of the WTO = A Jew by the name of Paul Wolfowitz = the architect of the Iraq war.............. and the guy that replaced Wolfowitz = Another Jew

& India just sign on. Did Hugo Chevez violated this law

2007-12-15 04:50:08 · 4 answers · asked by The One 2

He has not been alive for hundreds of years. That means PAST tense, or did you fail grammar along with science?

2007-12-15 04:48:51 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

Nothing more then personal property that they could do with or dispose of however they felt.
Does todays liberal consider the fetus in the womb as chattel..personal property that they can do with or dispose of however they like?

2007-12-15 04:39:47 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Im a democrat. I'm a demorat because I'm pro-choice, I believe abortion is right in certain cases, and I am not just for the rich. So, republican or democrat. You can say why you are if you want.

2007-12-15 04:17:50 · 14 answers · asked by catt_lover_mary 2

Are Dems trying to hurt poor Americans?

This tax is very regressive. Funny of the Dems?

2007-12-15 04:16:55 · 7 answers · asked by How Big is Your Govt Check 3

Plus there would be no gaurantee the GOP would let you live once all your assets were turned over.

2007-12-15 04:14:23 · 20 answers · asked by whirling W dervish 2

This "war on Christmas" garbage has got to stop. Seriously, is the average fundamentalist's faith so easily broken that any dissent will cause it to disappear? Does everyone have to raise your god above all others in your presence at all times? Should everyone be made to believe as you do?

And if so, how are you different than, say, the Taliban?

2007-12-15 04:12:34 · 12 answers · asked by Schmorgen 6

I was watching CNN a few hours ago and I saw good ol' Al Gore talk about Global Warming and some ideas on how to combat it. He also mentioned some ways on how to combat our energy crisis.

With regards to the environment, he said that one idea could be the imposition of tax over the pollution every individual makes instead of the imposition of tax over our salaries.

He further went on to say that if people want to have lower taxes, then we'd have no choice but to lower our pollution production. A little inspirational but, of course, there are problems attached to that idea.

One problem is the determination of the quantity of pollution every individual makes. Another is how to categorize pollution (in other words, what constitutes pollution? What if it's unintentional?).

What are your thoughts on the matter?

2007-12-15 04:01:05 · 14 answers · asked by James 3

2007-12-15 03:58:42 · 18 answers · asked by ? 6

Until this last debate, I didn't notice Edwards being so against corporate America. Is this a new direction for him or have I just missed his point all this time? Please give me your information reference source so I can read it first hand.

2007-12-15 03:58:09 · 12 answers · asked by Banker 6

Why not all other forms of torture, too?
Why not assassinations?
Why not taking hostages?
Why not summary executions?
We already lock people away in secret prisons without due process. Why not simply abandon all artificial notions of so called morality and just go for it?

Why put any limits on ourselves whatsoever if George Bush thinks, in his wisdom, that something might somehow help in prosecuting the war on terror?

Why let an insignificant thing like "morality" concern us? Where do we draw the line or should we even bother to draw a new one?

2007-12-15 03:46:07 · 12 answers · asked by Uhlan 6

... and called it "The Gospel According to Al Gore", would liberals actually believe in the Bible then?

2007-12-15 03:45:01 · 14 answers · asked by Mutt 7

Or was Abraham Lincoln really unqualified?

2007-12-15 03:41:14 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Yesterday this question was asked...... (Where Is The Proof, In The Form Of Documentation Or A Personal Account, That Bush Said:"The Constitution...
"...is just a piece of paper.")
Go to...
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/TreasonAbounds.html
Scroll down to Barry Goldwater..and Read it for yourself...

2007-12-15 03:40:10 · 6 answers · asked by bodie 3

By British- I apply my definition of British as Anglo-Celtic Christians with proven residence prior to 1910.

I aim to economically handicap horrid immigrant groups who self-fund, via boycott of their goods and services.

By purchasing only British- most especially small & medium businesses, we, the conscientious consumer may just enable the British Islander to survive the EU- Nu Labour cultural genocide.

2007-12-15 03:37:42 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

You have only two parties, if both of these parties agree on something which majority may not agree youhave no choice. Both of these parties have to get fund from major corporates. Mostly same companies provide funds to both of the candidates. It is impossible for a person to win election without raising the funds. So, is this really possible to make a political decision which is against the interest of multinationals and in support of common man.

2007-12-15 03:36:47 · 11 answers · asked by Happily Happy 7

At first glance, the opportunity to transmit information efficiently, would seem to enhance the voting public's ability to select their leaders. We have quickly have information and at a depth unavailable in the past. Therefore with better information, we have the opportunity for better choices.

Or is it counterintuitive? Does so much information confuse us and cause us to be less capable? Does it give us greater independence of thought or perhaps push us more to a
hive mentality that allows us to be more easily mislead? Does the vast quantity of information itself distract us? Are we so bombarded with details that we focus on the fluid surface issues that only have the illusion of depth?

2007-12-15 03:29:35 · 3 answers · asked by Sky Salad Clipper 3

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121407/content/01125111.guest.html

2007-12-15 03:26:40 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-15 03:15:08 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have recieved 2 violations for posting these vid's - I am disgusted with y/a Please consider posting them on mass - 3 US Generals - command staff who are critical of Bush - This is censorship

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tw4jSZLkJqA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kX_swVoz6zw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnwNONbLkpU&feature=related

2007-12-15 03:09:47 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

A few months ago, someone made a list of books written by those is the Clinton camp that showed the "private" side of Hillary...I think they were by her bodyguards or CIA dude protecting her...anyway, I have lost the list, and would like to add them to my Christmas list...Any help would be appreciated!

2007-12-15 03:09:39 · 18 answers · asked by Lilliput1212 4

This is one aspect I'd like to touch upon with a paper I'm writing, but I'm having trouble finding good information online that details the bureaucracy as the fourth branch. Yes, I know the basics as to why it would be, but I'm searching for a more in depth exploration of this.

I would be greatful if users could provide their own opinions as to why it is or is not the unelected fourth branch and could also provide me with links to further legitimate information.

Thanks!

2007-12-15 03:07:22 · 5 answers · asked by Katie R 3

And he thinks it's just a God damn peice of paper.
He took an oath, swore that he would uphold the constitution. But he has no respect for it.

2007-12-15 03:06:44 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Was this one of he federal judges that the administration missed when if fired the ones that didn't agree with the Bush adminstrations decisions?

2007-12-15 03:03:35 · 6 answers · asked by wooper 5

What if we left the 'God' thing on ones and fives and took it off of the tens, fifities and hundreds? How about replacing the 'God' thing in the 'Pledge' with 'Under the Constitution'? If we did that everyone would be happy. Also, all flags made or imported would have to be manufactured from fireproof material. Wadda' 'ya think?

2007-12-15 03:02:24 · 9 answers · asked by Noah H 7