Politics - 19 August 2007

2007-08-19 23:51:29 · 6 answers · asked by tim 5

KARL ROVE GAVE GOOD ADVISE,,,,so whats the problem,,,and who is to blaim,,,???

2007-08-19 23:49:10 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or is the monarchy winning, instead? Evidence doesn't seem to support that conclusion!

2007-08-19 23:49:02 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-19 22:20:03 · 5 answers · asked by zuh_ax 1

.....after Reagan left office"??? So says another Y/A member. Would that be the much touted economic boom in the '90's when Clinton was President?? Or is it now, when things are even better which has already been "blamed" on Bush?? I'm trying to make sense of all the double-talk.

2007-08-19 22:08:32 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

But Ronald Reagan terrible, one of the worst he was the devil!! Nothing he lives.

Feedback.....

2007-08-19 21:42:15 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think Quail Boy (Dick) should resign or be removed from office!?
He shot his friend in the face!
It wasnt even real hunting, they stocked the place with 1000 quail from somewhere else and put 'em in one place so the Vice President can hit 'em.

He STILL missed!

How did he miss, they were all there for him!!!

Feedback..........

2007-08-19 20:57:35 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

would you vote for him? why or why not?
if you had voted for him in the past, do you regret your choice, or do u not regret it? why??

2007-08-19 20:44:48 · 18 answers · asked by Sonora! :] 1

same crap, same purpose, same attention, same misleading, claims he is patriotic, hates terrorism but loves illegal terrorist in our country, thats why the borders are open and Guardsmen are not armed. wow how secure is that!

2007-08-19 20:29:25 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-19 20:26:49 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Just a wild thought. If he thought he could get a fair trial whether he is guilty or not he might be willing to turn himself in in order to go on trial. Lots of things will change with a change in government. Really no one has heard the side of Al Queda. Their story has not been heard. Right now the way of the current administration is to kill or silence. We really only get one side of the story of 911 and the hate against America.

Do you think Osama would give up in order to be heard so long as Bush and company doesn't have control over the military and the judicial system?

2007-08-19 19:30:15 · 28 answers · asked by Beertha 2

Is it even hard to do something politically shady. Are there already alot of watchdogs and dirtdiggers from other parties that make it hard for them to do wrong.

What are politicians doing these days to actively show they have nothing to hide? What are they doing to change the opinions of their jaded constituents and citizens in general.

2007-08-19 19:21:31 · 4 answers · asked by cpc26ca 1

Nearly a million for two washers, $20 million plus in fraudulent billing from a two woman operation. Any wonder why neocons love war so much?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20070816/pl_bloomberg/a_piz20xqxeu_1

Yeah, I know. It's from "Liberal" Bloomberg Business--not a reliable source like Fox News.

2007-08-19 19:11:42 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

"A company charged the Pentagon almost $1 million to ship two 19-cent washers to Iraq"

lol

2007-08-19 18:56:11 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

From single mothers and their children to the elderly who's pensions were bankrupted by the company they worked for.... to the veterans who were mentally broken from war...to the mentally handicapped ......etc.,etc.,etc.

Street people ...just like 2nd and 3rd world countries!!

Screw 'em if they can't function!

We, The United States of America can not do better!.....right?

2007-08-19 18:33:45 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

i choose neither

2007-08-19 18:25:03 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do Republicans really care about anyone but themselves?

Is it every man for themselves on this Earth?

2007-08-19 18:02:45 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Most republicans I have heard talk on this matter seem to always say its the responsibility of the states. Ok. Lets assume that I agree with you on that. How will the states pay for it. Ok. Lets assume you say that the federal government gives the states money for it, but that the states squander it on other things. If that is your view, can you tell me which programs the states should eliminate to help fix the decaying infrastructure? and lets assume you give me a list of 2 3 4 or 5 programs etc that you would eradicate to fix infrastructure a) what will those who benefit currently from those programs do in their absence, and b) what happens to all the money that the federal government collects in taxes if most social spending is the states' responsibility. Does the fed govt get to pretty spend that money at leisure and waste it...while the states pile on tax payers with additional taxes?

2007-08-19 17:55:56 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

...but to also favor social welfare programs that benefit less fortunate?

Isn't it contradicting when Democrats say it's ok for women to have abortions when the mother knowingly can't provide for the child financially but is pro social programs, such as welfare, which gives the underprivileged access to entities which supplement low income families effectively giving them access to resources they wouldn't be able to provide on their own financially?

Simply stated, How can Dem's support both?

2007-08-19 17:43:16 · 12 answers · asked by Glen B 6

If George hasn't figured out a way to call off the election and retain office.

You don't really think the wealthy powerbrokers of this country leave these things to chance do you? LOL!

They wouldn't be that wealthy and powerful if they were that foolish!

2007-08-19 17:34:38 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is everyone just cranky because tomorrow is Monday and it is back to work? Whatever it is I have work tomorrow so I have to get some sleep. Have a great time arguing fellow Yahoo answerers.

2007-08-19 17:30:20 · 11 answers · asked by Lindsey G 5

2007-08-19 17:11:07 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

is it true what he said on the media ?
http://www.iowapolitics.com/index.iml?Article=101870

2007-08-19 16:35:09 · 6 answers · asked by cyberbear 2

What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty or democracy?


That's a Gandhi quote, by the way.

2007-08-19 16:25:46 · 13 answers · asked by ænima 4

I think its pointless and it just divides US further. Is there such thing as being both? Why not just label it American

2007-08-19 16:24:40 · 17 answers · asked by Captain Kid 3

Why was this man elected to be mayor again? He had many days to prepare the city of New Orleans for this disaster but he did nothing.

2007-08-19 16:06:18 · 27 answers · asked by vegaswoman 6

2007-08-19 15:58:29 · 16 answers · asked by Freethinker 3

I saw video today of people in Cancun being proactive against this hurricance a full two days in advance of landfall. Those people rock in my opinion.

2007-08-19 15:39:46 · 20 answers · asked by vegaswoman 6

Personally, I like Obama and that Hillary Clinton is doing it for the publicity (like Arnold Swartzen-however u spell his name)

What do you think??? Feedback??

2007-08-19 15:24:59 · 15 answers · asked by oceanbabii20 2

I vote yes! No one talks about Obama and gets away with it!He needs to go down like Imus. I wont stop tell hes fired! I am gaining a following at my college to write letters saying well boycott products that fund his talk show. Whos with me?

2007-08-19 15:05:18 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous