Politics - 4 November 2006

Under political pressure from Republicans Bush posted many documents captured in the Iraq war on the web to help make the case that there was justification for Bush's war. In those documents were VERY DETAILED plans on HOW to build nuclear weapons from before 1991 when Saddam was his buddy.

Last night the White House finally shut down the web site after the New York Times asked about complaints from weapons experts that Bush was GIVING nuclear weapons plans to the terrorists.
The weapons experts were shocked by the public disclosures. Bush talks about fighting a war on terrorism yet he gives terrorists the most detailed a-bomb plans that have ever been published.

How could they put nuclear plans on the Internet without knowing that they were there?
The Republicans are putting the safety of the world at risk for pure political purposes!!!

Why are Bush & the Republicans HELPING
the terrorists get nuclear weapon information?

WHY?

2006-11-04 05:14:17 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-04 05:05:10 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Its November 4th, and I have yet to see any Remembrance Day poppies for sale in any of the shops within a couple of miles of where I live. I always wear a poppy at this time of year, but I can't buy one anywhere! Is this some kind of childish political statement on behalf of the shopkeepers?

2006-11-04 05:04:45 · 16 answers · asked by Mark J 2

2006-11-04 05:02:58 · 2 answers · asked by rambo 1

if you are not retarded or anything like that, it is shameful for you to be making the minimum wage. what is wrong with you? go out and harvest more skills for yourself! why are you so lazy?

2006-11-04 05:01:04 · 7 answers · asked by General P 2

Clinton's war in Somalia cost us 31 men, and Bush's war in Iraq has cost us 2,826 men and is still counting...

Sounds like Clinton was better for our military then Bush, or do you like our troops killed?

2006-11-04 04:58:13 · 14 answers · asked by John S 4

2006-11-04 04:53:53 · 10 answers · asked by fireburn 1

2006-11-04 04:47:52 · 14 answers · asked by sonar_bungala 2

what a joke.

2006-11-04 04:43:03 · 19 answers · asked by General P 2

Will the Muslims twoist the story to blame the Israelis for the shootings yesterday of the women who tried to protect their men hiding in the mosques?

2006-11-04 04:41:56 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15519404/

Very eloquent denouncement of the cynical desperate lies of our national embarrassment. We, the American people, have had enough. Let's hope the next two years go by quickly, until we can replace the lame duck with a *real* leader.

2006-11-04 04:41:51 · 4 answers · asked by silentnonrev 7

freeze their assets and take 50% to give to the most needy/ if the rich try to run we chop them down

2006-11-04 04:34:01 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Could we have a verdict earlier, if Karl Rove wasn't playing politics?

And, when will we be authorized to capture Bin Laden? Does Bush needs permission between the respective Bush and Bin Laden parents? After all, they were oil buddies.

2006-11-04 04:26:46 · 8 answers · asked by rideitmark 2

2006-11-04 04:25:47 · 16 answers · asked by Luis 3

...which they tend to blame on the incompetence of President Bush.

Quoting: {Kenneth Adelman: "The most dispiriting and awful moment of the whole administration was the day that Bush gave the Presidential Medal of Freedom to [former C.I.A. director] George Tenet, General Tommy Franks, and [Coalition Provisional Authority chief] Jerry [Paul] Bremer—three of the most incompetent people who've ever served in such key spots. And they get the highest civilian honor a president can bestow on anyone! That was the day I checked out of this administration. It was then I thought, There's no seriousness here, these are not serious people. If he had been serious, the president would have realized that those three are each directly responsible for the disaster of Iraq."}
from "Neo Culpa" in Vanity Fair
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2006/12/neocons200612?currentPage=1

2006-11-04 04:25:46 · 5 answers · asked by ideogenetic 7

Hussein was captured shortly our invasion in Iraq. but still no Osama Bin Laden very strange he actually perpetrated crimes against the American people but Bush and many others seem to have forgotten that is he in Afghanistan or in DC hiding out seems strange we can't capture him attention should still be focused on him the diversions tactics are over get the man already

2006-11-04 04:24:57 · 8 answers · asked by katlady927 6

their idea of "victory"?
Pelosi Kerry and liberals have a long record of voting against the military why?

2006-11-04 04:17:08 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-04 04:13:03 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-04 04:11:29 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am curious to see your views on "winning" in Iraq.

2006-11-04 04:09:37 · 6 answers · asked by Cold Stone 2

Seems to me (especially since I actually fought in Iraq, unlike you 101st Fightin' Keyboard Brigade members) that he was a paper tiger who posed VERY little threat to our way of life. Bin Ladin (and Kim il-Jong for that matter) were much larger threats. Yet Bin Ladin is still breathing air today. Why?

2006-11-04 04:05:40 · 11 answers · asked by Cold Stone 2

Times On Line November 04, 2006
Six Arab States Join Rush To Go Nuclear
By Richard Beeston, Diplomatic Editor

Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, UAE and Saudi Arabia seek atom technology

THE SPECTRE of a nuclear race in the Middle East was raised yesterday when six Arab states announced that they were embarking on programmes to master atomic technology.

The move, which follows the failure by the West to curb Iran’s controversial nuclear programme, could see a rapid spread of nuclear reactors in one of the world’s most unstable regions, stretching from the Gulf to the Levant and into North Africa.

The countries involved were named by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as Algeria, Egypt, Morocco and Saudi Arabia. Tunisia and the UAE have also shown interest.....


Humm. Guess we all saw it coming. Maybe one day we'll all wind up blowing each other up....Soon every country will be in the race.

its such a sad state of affairs.

2006-11-04 04:05:36 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-04 04:03:41 · 16 answers · asked by ? 6

what can we do when countries like china, india, america,and nearly all the rest of the world have no interest in it at all,and are the main pollutors,

2006-11-04 04:01:59 · 22 answers · asked by lynvonwall 2

..talk to a civilian lawyer. It was reported today that: "A suspected terrorist who spent years in a secret CIA prison should not be allowed to speak to a civilian attorney, the Bush administration argues, because he could reveal the agency's closely guarded interrogation techniques."

Obviously Bush doesn't want the world to know what torture techniques he authorized the CIA to engage in on his "war on terror". When America's treatment of other human beings is so bad that it has to be hidden from public view we have reached a new low.

2006-11-04 03:58:33 · 14 answers · asked by rec 3

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlmzASn7Rs3xg__UUI6m2hPsy6IX?qid=20061031092711AAi2rvR

43 is the smartest of us all

2006-11-04 03:58:03 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

What a bunch of sissies! They can't even act like real men, typical Muslims. I really hope Israel wipes out their enemy, once and for all!

2006-11-04 03:54:57 · 11 answers · asked by college_republicans_club 2

2006-11-04 03:53:23 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

me?
power , immense power,
so absolute that even god himself would bow down before me and allow me to crush heaven.
what about you?

2006-11-04 03:52:26 · 11 answers · asked by sir buttwipe 1

They can tell a better joke AL LA John Kerry's funny one. Made me laugh so hard I peed my pants! Who else thought that "joke" was a knee slapper?

2006-11-04 03:51:58 · 15 answers · asked by HELLBENT 2