Would you have preferred that Bin Laden be captured instead of Saddam?

Answer 1

sure. At least he was a legitimate target

Answer 2

What is the difference anyways. Maybe Osama bin Laden killed 2000 americans in a 10 minutes, but Saddam is killing his own and international soldiers everyday. Also, in term of revenge it would not make any difference.

Answer 3

there replaced into an incredible article on the subject of the hunt for Bin weighted down 2 weeks in the past interior the long island situations sunday magazine. At one factor, a platoon replaced into interior of numerous hundered yards of his cave hideout and an al qaeda look after almost gave the command to commit suicide (Bin weighted down has informed his adult men that he, and those protecting him, could desire to commit suicide in leau of being captured). actuality is, Bin weighted down is considered a cleric, and, as such, community tribesman and village leaders interior the section Bin weighted down is placed, won't "supply him up" using deeply felt religous reasons. Bush isn't the hunter, our troops on the floor are. There have undoutedly been errors, yet, all human ebdeavors have them, and, i do no longer see a loose Bin weighted down as a partisan situation.

Answer 4

Saddam and Iraq were "targets of opportunity". The real target is still running around.

Answer 5

Yes as that would have meant that we stayed the course in Afghanistan and not have entered into this mistake in Iraq. It would have also given a lesson to the terrorist that we meant what we said and that was that we would hunt them down and administer justice. It would not have given them time to gather disciples.

Answer 6

Yes

Answer 7

yes along with Fidel, Hugo, leader of Iran We must rid the world of ALL terrorists

Answer 8

of course
but Bush doesnt care about capturing Binladen

Answer 9

I would have preferred a better reason to go into Iraq

Answer 10

That's like saying, 'would you prefer to be dead or be dead'. They're both menaces to the world.