their idea of "victory"?
Pelosi Kerry and liberals have a long record of voting against the military why?
2006-11-04 04:17:08 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
great job cold avoid the real issue and not answer you are a true lib
2006-11-04 04:21:19 · update #1
Hey cold stone your right! The troops are lacking supplies, like support from the US citizens,
2006-11-04 04:23:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
I think some liberals have a different idea than you do as to how you vote for the miltiary. Most would say that sending our military into an unnecessary war does constitute support for the troops. Most would say sending troops into war without the necessary equipment is not support for the troops. Most would say that trying to fight a war on the cheap does not equate to supporting the troops.
In addition, you have a short memory if you think the democrats have a long record of voting against the military. Roosevelt, Truman and Johnson did more to support our troops than any conservative president you can name.
2006-11-04 04:29:50 · answer #2 · answered by rec 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
expensive Troll, by using fact they comprehend a misplaced reason whilst they see one. Bush had no plan by any potential and underestimated the potential of the enemy. Bush thought it would be an consumer-friendly grab for oil and no person ought to care much less approximately no count if Iraqis stay in a democracy no longer even the Iraqi people. The Iraqi people will consistently be sheep merely like the turn flopping Republicans who're going returned to vote Democrat returned. Bush and all Republicans are reducing and working. Bush is a fool, an ignorant hillbilly and the country observed him by using fact of them being much greater stupid. i think persons are bored with seeing their infants coming homestead in physique luggage for a misplaced reason that grew to become into poorly thought out. by potential of how Bush isn't a real conservative nor does he represent a real Republican. in no way did in no way will.
2016-12-28 12:38:03 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LBJ escalated the Vietnam War after Kennedy's assassination and LBJ was a Democrat. FDR was also a Democrat and had no problem doing whatever it took to win WW II. Democrats aren't afraid of war but find this war to be a "Vietnam" in the making. We've lost too many lives at too great an expense. It's time to pull the plug. If the Iraqi's can't obtain their own freedom without us with all that's been done for them, then they don't really want it.
2006-11-04 04:31:21 · answer #4 · answered by Debra D 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That's not entirely right.
Excuse Liberals for wanting to return ALL troops home so they don't die or get seriously injured in a pointless war.
If Repubs are so great about military spending why don't they raise the incomes of our soldiers?
2006-11-04 04:23:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The libs have already done that, Billary took us from 18 divisions to 12, then 10. Its pathetic!
whatta, the republicans closed bases and colsolidated people at larger facilities. They have cut no overall numbers like ole slashing Billary did!
2006-11-04 04:21:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If George W. Bush was in charge after Pearl Harbor, would he have attacked Canada?
2006-11-04 04:21:56 · answer #7 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
A country does not need a strong and overwhelming military to be respected.
2006-11-04 04:31:41 · answer #8 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How about how this administration continues to cut the VA budget (FACT). How about how this administration that claims to "support the troops" made us (the ones who fought in Iraq) go to Iraq in vietnam era equipment and a lack of supplies (FACT). How about the administration not punishing any of the policy makers on Abu Gharib? A bunch of enlisted folks got hammered for that. Good way to support the troops!
2006-11-04 04:20:03 · answer #9 · answered by Cold Stone 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
the liberal hate machine talks about the troops not having the proper equipment, it is a miracle that they even have guns after Clinton got thru with them.
2006-11-04 04:22:16 · answer #10 · answered by 007 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋