2006-11-04 04:53:53 · 10 answers · asked by fireburn 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amadou_Diallo_(shooting_victim)
2006-11-04 04:56:00 · update #1
Unbelievable that no one was charged. Fault was ultimately determined in the 3 million dollar settlement ... a poor substitute for a son. And the Street Crimes Unit was disbanded - isn't that an indictment? With this outcome, how can anyone say there was no one at fault?
2006-11-05 00:46:57 · answer #1 · answered by Bad Kitty! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Clearly the person responsible for their marksmanship is at fault. Less than 50%? Come on... that's just sad.
2006-11-04 13:00:35 · answer #2 · answered by Hate Boy! 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Discuss foreign policy
2006-11-04 13:03:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
1 injustice of many. Unfortunately many more to come.
2006-11-04 13:05:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Makes no sense.....but that is how the boys in blue get down.
2006-11-04 12:55:41 · answer #5 · answered by Cold Stone 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is this a question or a statement?
2006-11-04 12:57:40 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Asking this again? Shut up already..
2006-11-04 12:55:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
why so many shots? it would be someone fault.
2006-11-04 12:55:24 · answer #8 · answered by knowssignlanguage 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It happened 30 years ago! What, exactly, is your point?
2006-11-04 13:02:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
blind gunman
2006-11-04 12:55:33 · answer #10 · answered by TARD 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋