Could we have a verdict earlier, if Karl Rove wasn't playing politics?
And, when will we be authorized to capture Bin Laden? Does Bush needs permission between the respective Bush and Bin Laden parents? After all, they were oil buddies.
2006-11-04 04:26:46 · 8 answers · asked by rideitmark 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Getting the verdict on Saddam shows progress in Iraq, a victory talking point. The trouble is Iraqi violence may acutally be up now because Iraqis believe they can influence US elections. Add that to the verdict, and you have quite an incendiary mix. In other words, annoucing the verdict now will likely lead to more deaths in Iraq than announcing it next week would. But announcing the verdict now probably will get the Republicans more votes, which is all that matters of course.
2006-11-04 04:32:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe he did. I also believe we already have Bin Laden, but won't parade him around until just before the next presidential election in two years. And of course the moms and pops have everything to do with it...you don't think Dubya makes any decisions on his own, do you?
2006-11-04 12:30:45 · answer #2 · answered by Kodoku Josei 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, so Bush did Hurricane Katrina, and caused a spike in military attacks right before elections
Sweet
2006-11-04 12:28:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
But wouldnd't you want it sooner, to really push things along? If you wait until Monday, many folks have voted and many more are set in their mind
2006-11-04 12:29:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
without a doubt
2006-11-04 12:32:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably.
And probably.
2006-11-04 12:31:12 · answer #6 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stop this crap now!
This is why conservatives spew hatred at Democrats!!!
2006-11-04 12:32:28 · answer #7 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I hope so and conspiracy theories are funny Keep them coming
2006-11-04 12:30:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋