If you are one of the people who constantly refer to the main cause or reason for our Iraq invasion, as well as other military ventures in the recent past as OIL - please answer:
Why didn't we just keep Kuwait after we drove the Iraqis out?
Why did we make the Arabs so filthy rich over the years by PAYING for their oil?
Why did we not invade them in 1974 when they almost crippled our economy with their oil embargo?
And, finally, how do you explain Viet Nam, Korea, El Salvadore, Samolia, etc..etc...
There's no oil in those places, only repressed people.
Convince me that the United States' intentions in all of these examples was anything but for humanitarian or defensive purposes - and, therefore, justifiable. Try and rely on facts and not bogus websites and op-blogs.
For anyone tempted to bash Bush or Kerry or Clinton or whomever -
This is not a Republican vs. Democrat question.
It is a bipartison question concerning United States' foreign policies.
2006-10-31
16:18:42
·
17 answers
·
asked by
LeAnne
7