English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 9 October 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

I'd like your thoughts between two presidents on facts not opinion,between the Bush presidency and the Clinton presidency. let's see if you are all smart enough to do some homework from facts(not OPINIONS!!!)I stress once again list your sources with any comments(I'm a republican,but I'm going to be impartial here to see if anyone can accept this challenge and it is costing me 5 points to give the best and most informative 10 points...I Dare You!!!

2006-10-09 09:38:19 · 10 answers · asked by stygianwolfe 7

Opinions?

2006-10-09 09:31:48 · 12 answers · asked by I am all that is man 2

be allowed to contribute troops to the U.N peacekeeping force in southren Lebanon?

2006-10-09 09:28:50 · 5 answers · asked by Angel of Man 4

an email and and instant message????? IF YOU DO NOT, STOP ANSWERING QUESTIONS REGARDING THEM!

the GOP , along with ABC news was informed about a few of foleys EMAILS a while ago. Neither one of the two thought they were worth reporting. THERE WAS NO SEXUAL CONTENT IN THEM.

The INSTANT MESSAGES, were just recently brought to light. The GOP, nor ABC knew about these before anyone else. The first ones to report the instant messages were the democrats. How long did they have these instant messages before releasing them????

2006-10-09 09:24:51 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

America is effectively policing the rest of the world. America is trying to control the nuclear activities of North Korea. But who is policing America? Isn't the fact that America is not policed by anybody a more dangerous problem than North Korea?

A drug addict who is still taking drugs saying to another drug addict "don't take drugs, drugs are bad, but it's ok for me to take drugs, I know what I'm doing".

Please discuss.

2006-10-09 09:24:13 · 35 answers · asked by Brown Bear 2

2006-10-09 09:24:07 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

they dont want us to talk about him, it hurts their feelings

2006-10-09 09:20:23 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-09 09:16:09 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean, CLinton doesn't have anything to do with the question, and yet he is still mentioned. And yet strangely, the question is never answered. Why is that? Why can't we talk about today? How is Clinton's presidency relevant to any of the decisions the Bush administration has made? Now, let's watch all on the right talk about Clinton, and all on the left talk about Bush. Ready...GO!

2006-10-09 09:13:14 · 28 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

and why did it take two of them?

2006-10-09 09:07:54 · 14 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

She is a Florida resident after all.

2006-10-09 09:05:34 · 7 answers · asked by Where's the beef? 2

Is this a record? Can anyone name the key events?

2006-10-09 09:03:04 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why did they refuse to censor democrat pedophiles in the 80s?

2006-10-09 08:58:02 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Isn't that sort of thing right up the aclu's alley? They defend nambla publications, defend nudist camps for teens, and other similar things. Why wouldn't they consider what foley did free speach?

http://www.watchblog.com/republicans/archives/003583.html

2006-10-09 08:57:59 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

He is blamed for everything.

2006-10-09 08:56:44 · 18 answers · asked by Ah Ha 4

...he seems to be a good bet to bring back some much needed bi-partisanship and a reasonably appealing, articulate and intelligent Republican canidate with some non-manufactured integrity to his credit?

Also, does this relate to the absurd character smearing that Carl Rove, with Dubya's smirky approval, gave to him in South Carolina in 2000?

2006-10-09 08:53:49 · 6 answers · asked by Middy S 2

Talk about grasping at straws, libbers. Terrorists in Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Palestine, Israel, Indonesia, Turkey, Afghanistan, Pakistan, South Florida but NONE IN IRAQ UNDER SADDAM.

I think the libs have cracked up for sometime now. Funny how Saddam openly admitted giving money to fund suicide bombers.

2006-10-09 08:47:20 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

The UN presently has internatinal "peacekeepers", not it's own army.

A powerful UN can deal with nations like North Korea, and back it with REAL military power.

A strong UN, with a strong leader. A United Nations Army with about 5 million men....would save American lives. Would deal with international threats, and rogue nations. THEN WE WILL HAVE PEACE.

What do you think?

2006-10-09 08:47:03 · 11 answers · asked by Villain 6

Or my pet fish.

2006-10-09 08:46:11 · 9 answers · asked by Ah Ha 4

2006-10-09 08:39:12 · 19 answers · asked by dstr 6

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/UN_KOREA?SITE=MAFAL&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

-

2006-10-09 08:37:37 · 17 answers · asked by notme 5

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061009/ap_on_el_se/allen_in_business;_ylt=Al5UMk6WBqKinZqctOJkqQyyFz4D;_ylu=X3oDMTA0cDJlYmhvBHNlYwM-

2006-10-09 08:35:16 · 9 answers · asked by Where's the beef? 2

I suppose if its all he did all day was go around smacking azzes, or doing whoever he had a mind too, in the oval office, smoking his favorite "cigars", looking into gay rights, letting Laura help him run the Country, allow terrorists to get away with blowing up buildings, Embassies, ships....he would be respected by the "lefties" and whoever else has so much expression of negativity.

All I gotta say is, What a sad bunch, you all are!!

2006-10-09 08:34:15 · 44 answers · asked by Katz 6

How much do you get in your welfare check?

2006-10-09 08:32:16 · 8 answers · asked by El Pistolero Negra 5

fedest.com, questions and answers