Politics - 9 October 2006

The society I want to live in provides a good public education, good military defense, good roads and other public services. These things don't come cheap. I've gotten many benefits from this society why shouldn't I pay more? Why should the middle and working class be taxed beyond their means. This is what WILL happen if the rich and upper middle get more breaks.

2006-10-09 10:49:26 · 8 answers · asked by TxSup 5

Check out the answer by the lib that states "outdated" LMAO



http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ak.wQ4VZoNVzd7ugrQ1m4jPzy6IX?qid=20061009143920AAjILjq

2006-10-09 10:47:21 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-09 10:46:38 · 8 answers · asked by butterflykisses4me2003 1

Or is he just trying to appeal to the young vote?

2006-10-09 10:45:51 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-09 10:45:22 · 7 answers · asked by ? 6

Sorry i might lose myself and not actually ask a question here but how the hell can the USA be up in arms about North Korea testing nuclear arms when they blew the crap out of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Don't get me wrong i know times change but a very hypocritical don't you think?

2006-10-09 10:41:38 · 17 answers · asked by millerman022002 3

The 2nd amendment reads;

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Should we be allowed to stockpile bomb making material? Blasting caps? Nitrogen fertilizer in mass quantities? Nuclear devices? Dirty bombs? Infectious biological agents? Neurotoxins? Rocket launchers?

If my neighbor is a nuclear physicist doesn't the second amendment allow him to set up a missile launch pad with nuclear devices on board?

Would anyone think the second amendment applies to any of these? I hope not, but I hope you can see my point that they are not legal because they are a significant threat to the health and safety of all citizens. They are also inanimate objects (like automatic assault weapons). The sole purpose for owning an assault weapon is for killing. Their proliferation is a public safety threat - numerous studies comparing countries with and without them has shown it. Response?

2006-10-09 10:39:20 · 9 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

after all the crap thats happened, u have to be stupid not to realize that republicans messed up the US, so why would any >>intelligent<< american vote for a republican?

2006-10-09 10:37:12 · 23 answers · asked by balanced112 2

Don't they realize this means the middle class will shoulder more of the burden for homeland security and defense, public education, and keeping social security and medicare solvent?

2006-10-09 10:35:15 · 17 answers · asked by TxSup 5

2006-10-09 10:33:51 · 11 answers · asked by Where's the beef? 2

We have lost 3000 americans in this war and wounded another 25,000 to bring freedom to a bunch of people that do not know what it is .Voting is not freedom .It is what you vote for .They want jails and killing and torture of there enimies .Sunni shia whatever each side hates the other and wants to harm them .
Imagine the south during the civil rights movment if it was ok to just kill as many as you wanted to put down the uprising .America is the police in this battle between religious groups in Iraq And one thing the police and military got during the civil rights movment was a black EYE .
Lets learn from our own history and accept that these people do not needs us at this time .They are not ready for freedom .

2006-10-09 10:33:34 · 9 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

I will not believe you if you don't provide a Link.

2006-10-09 10:32:54 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Whoever voted for Bush, should enlist and go fight...

The war would be over with then...

Stand behind your man....Pubs'.!....Go fight...!!

2006-10-09 10:26:50 · 11 answers · asked by Madmax 3

It seems like no one likes them. Why?

2006-10-09 10:23:54 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

We are in the middle of two wars, and the Democrats are known for bing softies like Clinton.

Whatever the Bush administration has done wrong, at least they are not cowards during a time of war.

2006-10-09 10:17:34 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-09 10:14:37 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

I do. Al Qaeda has nuclear weapons, according to a reporter who talked to someone who talked to U Bin Laden. Also, Usama has warned the US three times (according to Muslim tradition). Also, Usama tried to warn all American Muslims to leave all US cities.

New York is going to be nuked soon.

It's just logical, anyways think aout it. Al Qaeda has been stepping up their attacks since 1993, and has sworn to destroy the US.

2006-10-09 10:12:55 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Here's my idea, substitute the word "Clinton" with the phrase "our own incompetence". Try this on the Republican answers to many questions. It works great.

2006-10-09 10:12:02 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Which would you rather have? A government that imposes laws which take away your rights but also prevent terrorist attacks from happening, or a government that doesn't take away freedoms and reacts to terrorist attacks while doing very little to prevent them?

2006-10-09 10:10:16 · 15 answers · asked by Onan the Barbarian 1

That if we collected all the bullshit that comes out of Bush's mouth, we'd solve our global fuel problem overnight?

2006-10-09 10:09:45 · 14 answers · asked by letem haveit 4

And what the heck does Clinton have to do with the Foley scandal? And why do the cons. bring Clinton into it?

2006-10-09 10:08:50 · 6 answers · asked by JS 3

I know that he was enormously poplular during his time, his re-election in 1984 was the largest blowout of all time, but he actually seems to have gained popularity since then, why?

2006-10-09 10:05:22 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do hunters need assault weapons? Does the average citizen need assault weapons?

Now they're turning up in our schools...

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/10/09/missouri.school.ap/index.html

2006-10-09 10:01:35 · 13 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

they think they are so moral, yet they are the ones lying and giving BS reasons to go to war, and then now Foley is trying to have sex with his intern, look at da hipocrisy of ur "morality".

2006-10-09 09:58:36 · 17 answers · asked by balanced112 2

2006-10-09 09:57:00 · 13 answers · asked by silverspore 1

intelligent then we all already think they are. Are you unable to come up with an argument that is actually relevant?

2006-10-09 09:56:45 · 18 answers · asked by ? 6

2006-10-09 09:55:31 · 13 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

2006-10-09 09:54:10 · 14 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

or does the word "is" still throw them off?

2006-10-09 09:52:42 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-09 09:46:06 · 7 answers · asked by James W 1