We have lost 3000 americans in this war and wounded another 25,000 to bring freedom to a bunch of people that do not know what it is .Voting is not freedom .It is what you vote for .They want jails and killing and torture of there enimies .Sunni shia whatever each side hates the other and wants to harm them .
Imagine the south during the civil rights movment if it was ok to just kill as many as you wanted to put down the uprising .America is the police in this battle between religious groups in Iraq And one thing the police and military got during the civil rights movment was a black EYE .
Lets learn from our own history and accept that these people do not needs us at this time .They are not ready for freedom .
2006-10-09 10:33:34 · 9 answers · asked by playtoofast 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
precisely..... i just dont think we should waste our american taxpayers dollars on a pointless war.
2006-10-09 10:39:49 · answer #1 · answered by balanced112 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What would have happen in 1776 if Germany had invaded the colonies, kicked out the British, and then tried to establish the United States of America?
Conservative logic does not bode well in foreign policy. It can't. It's doomed to failure. The conservative mind is too focused and goal oriented. Only liberal thinking can solve a problem in which a variety of prospectives are involved.
One must understand the strengths and weaknesses of both conservative and liberal minds. Conservatives do well in areas that require single minded action to achieve the goal. Business, the economy, and the military are their forte.
Liberals strengths are social issues, education, and foreign policy. These areas require a mind that can understand many different viewpoints.
One should consider America a team and not two opposing political parties. In a team, you want your players to fill the position in which they excell.
2006-10-09 11:24:02 · answer #2 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Left him alone? Absolutely NOT!, Invade and occupy Iraq while we Kill 10 times the innocent Iraqis that he killed and lose 3000 young americans in the process? Hell No!...
The answer to Saddam was not invasion nor is it the answer to North Korea or Iran...We absolutely should have invaded afghanistan though....We should still be there , But were not...We outsourced catching Osama to NATO troops...Crazy huh!
2006-10-09 10:45:53 · answer #3 · answered by LENNON3804 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm not a Liberal in the yank or British political experience yet to respond to your first question i might say positively Saddam ought to have been left to pursue his time table all alongside and stunning from the take over of Kuwait, he replaced right into a clever best buddy and ran the main secular us of a in the area. Kuwait replaced right into a a strategies much less democratic us of a and its all human beings is matters not electorate. In putting aside the alleged arguments approximately WMD and terrorists you're putting aside the finished reasoning and fake justification for the undeclared and now irresolvable conflict that we are caught w. probably for generations to return. in case you're saying which you/all of us understand he raped, murdered, and tortured his human beings, what's he on trial for, maximum individuals have faith regardless of their government tells them and that they have got been informed what the call is years in the past, why fake it is Nuremburg the place data replaced into required? As you are able to know it is been formally acknowledged on the instant by making use of the US government that Saddam certainly did not have any ties to Al Qaeda, so because it particularly is not going to be considered a skill concept or helping argument. ultimately there are a number of poor leaders in that section; happily none of them have the potential that the 'advisers' of President Bush have. We used Iraq to combat Iran; we created 2 Frankensteins now we are purely making concerns worse by making use of the day and doubtlessly stoking WW3. Wars of conquest the place we take over source wealthy worldwide places on fake pretexts and setting up puppet governments can purely bring about extra desirable issues sooner or later. We ran Iran w. a puppet Shaw till the 'seventy 9 revolution, look on the themes that has brought about formerly for the time of and because, large injustices have a bent to bring about extra desirable injustices. extra it is not properly worth it, wealthy adult males's better halves ought to force smaller automobiles, we are able to run diesels on veg oil there is alcohol/electric/hydrogen and conservation that's needed in the long term besides. we ought to continuously plow the billions being wasted on combating an entire race and faith of human beings who we are making hate us into new technologies which could make petroleum as out of date as whale oil.
2016-10-19 02:38:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whatever the situation was in Iraq before we went over and started killing aimlessly, I am sure it was much better than it is now. We should never had gone over in the first place.
2006-10-09 10:45:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush also killed more than 100,000 people in Iraq and Afghan to maintain his new order.
Should you left him alone or not in Guantanamo Prison?
2006-10-09 18:28:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was evil. If the people hated him, they could of got rid of him themselves.
There are a lot of evil dictators in the world. We can't fight them all.
2006-10-09 10:47:03 · answer #7 · answered by Villain 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush should have never took office.
2006-10-09 10:42:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
crazy needs crazy.
2006-10-09 10:54:35 · answer #9 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋