And what the heck does Clinton have to do with the Foley scandal? And why do the cons. bring Clinton into it?
2006-10-09 10:08:50 · 6 answers · asked by JS 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because that's what they do. Clinton has nothing to do with the Foley scandal. They're liars and hypocrites and blame Clinton for everything. These are the same people who were so moral and went after Clinton over Monica Lewinsky. They were going to bring integrity back to Washington. Yeah right. But then their secrets come out and they start pointing fingers.
Example please? Sean Hannity brought up Clinton saying that the last scandal was his, so he's to blame for this one. He said Monica was 19 years old, so she was still a teenager. That was a lie. Monica was 22. He just said she was 19 so he could try to make a point that she was still a teenager. They'll grasp at anything. To bring up Clinton in response to any question about this current scandal is lame. Are they trying to say that after the Clinton scandal and after they were all so self-righteous about it, that they don't know what is acceptable conduct ? Always an excuse or finger pointing with these people.
2006-10-09 10:16:27 · answer #1 · answered by grrandram 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because Republicans are yellow bellied cowards and not even honest enough to take the blame for anything.
Clinton has nothing to do with the Foley Scandal. It all began about 6 years ago when George Walker Bush moved his Nazi @$$, and his murdering wife, and slutty twin daughers into the White House.
2006-10-09 17:14:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey stinky, whats this?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,952289,00.html
Nicolas, Hastert blamed Clinton last Friday for Foleygate.
http://outofthepublicsquare.com/?p=401
Way to go republicans.
2006-10-09 17:30:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because when Clinton LIED UNDER OATH all the libs said that his SEX LIFE was his own business.
Foley IS a degenerate pervert (as was Clinton) and suddenly the libs are making HIS sex life their business.
Rather hypocritical...don't ya think?
2006-10-10 17:47:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
example please.
When we bring Clinton up, it is usually to show that the question asker is trying to make a hypocritical point.
2006-10-09 17:13:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
because of this link
2006-10-09 17:26:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋