2006-10-09 08:26:18 · 14 answers · asked by fireburn 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Most terrorism is conducted by the secret services, primarily CIA/MI6/Mossad/ISI, who between them are responsible for 9/11, 7/7, Madrid train bombing, Bali bombing, Mumbai train bombing, Lockerbie air disaster, and loads more.
What the war on terrorism is all about is to keep the people frightened enough so that they give up their freedoms in exchange for ill-perceived security.
The Patriot Act and further acts and presidential signings have now resulted in the fact that ANYBODY can be arrested for no reason at all, then told that they are a suspected terrorist, and imprisoned for an unlimited period with no recourse to law.
They can even be shipped off to a foreign country and tortured!
This has happened already, and it will happen again. It can happen to YOU.
The idea of terrorism is to promote the agenda of the Illuminati/New World Order, who control the governments, and their secret services. That agenda is to take control of the entire world, remove over half the population, and reduce the freedoms of the remainder to the levels of slavery
An Illuminati Primer
http://www.rinf.com/news/nov05/illuminati.html
Rothschild/Rockefeller
The Architecture of Modern Political Power
http://dgwa1.fortunecity.com/fourthreich/rockroth.html
2006-10-10 01:26:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Are you speaking concerning the 5 Rep's which would be talking on the convention over the subsequent 2 days. i understand Rep's love the terrorists this is why they shrink and run from them yet come on the 5 Rep's it particularly is backing Obama does not have faith in helping the terrorist like Bush/McCain does.
2016-10-19 02:26:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's what backround checks are for. If a gun dealer see anything "gray" on your history they do not have to see you the gun if they don't want to. But anyway, if a terrorist or terrorist sympathizers wants to get a gun, the easiest and cheaper way is to get it illegally. That's just to get a semi-auto firearm, if they want a full-auto weapon, there is ALOT of paperwork and history checks just to be able to buy one.
2006-10-10 11:39:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
and how would you determine who these terrorists are?
plus don't you think if someone was identified as a terroirst buying a gun from Walmart would be pretty much out of the question?
plus if someone was actually a terrorist they wouldn't be buying guns via conventional means anyway, making such laws moot. they would only serve to annoy those who buy guns legally for legal purposes
2006-10-09 08:30:53 · answer #4 · answered by Random Nimrod 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There are already laws making EVERYONE pass background checks before you can purchase legal firearms, they don't qualify.
2006-10-10 17:52:38 · answer #5 · answered by .45 Peacemaker 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How about simply banning the sale of firearms, period. Yes, I know that that sends a chill down your spine, but it would happen to save untold lives just in the single realm of accidental and family related deaths.
Yeah, I know. Too right thinking for you.
2006-10-09 08:41:53 · answer #6 · answered by ElOsoBravo 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
this is probably the best question I've read today...
and a difficult one to answer. red flags should go up when a suspected terrorist applies for a gun. Gun shop owners should have access to those lists by running it through a registry. Should gun shop owners, like bar owners, have a right to deny sale for ANY reason? I think they should be able to...
2006-10-09 08:34:14 · answer #7 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Lets just make a law against terrorism! Or make it against the law to kill people.
That will work.....right?
2006-10-09 08:38:30 · answer #8 · answered by rjf 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
An unarmed citizenry is a government's dream come true.
2006-10-09 08:34:36 · answer #9 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
"terrorist" like the word "cool" is used way too loosely what people,authority, or party would define it?
What would the appeal process look like?...no thanks!
2006-10-09 08:33:40 · answer #10 · answered by dstr 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋