Politics - 2 October 2006

To be a liberal you must:

1. "Feel", but never think.
2. Convince yourself that it is okay to suck a baby into a sink and rip it to shreds.
3. Be afraid to stand up to the bullies in the world.
4. Be more afraid of a gun in the hand of an honest citizen than in the hand of the government.
5. Put a higher value on non-human life than human life.
6. Support "womb-to-the-tomb" government control over your life.
7. Believe that blacks and Hispanics are too stupid to succeed in life all on their own.
8. That all Christians, especially southern white men, are racist, bigoted, homophobes.

2006-10-02 05:50:17 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Are the republicans the party of little boy diddlers?

2006-10-02 05:47:56 · 10 answers · asked by mutterhals 4

They are all bad, but who do you think would be the worst?

And don't avoid the question by saying anything is better than what we have now, you predictable liberals!

2006-10-02 05:47:48 · 14 answers · asked by buffman316 2

And also, since they invited Hillary Clinton to ask a question on Yahoo! Answers, I'd like to see them invite a prominent Republican to ask a question as well. I mean, at least they could try to ACT like they don't have a distinct and deliberate viewpoint.

2006-10-02 05:45:45 · 19 answers · asked by ♥ady_8e_80♥ 4

Republican values are the opposite of what the Gospel teaches, but Democrats are unwilling to challenge "spinning" of the Bible by GOP hippocrites. WHY? WHY? WHY!

2006-10-02 05:38:50 · 16 answers · asked by JB 3

2006-10-02 05:37:57 · 7 answers · asked by raisingtheblinds 2

2006-10-02 05:37:36 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

As he claimed on 60 Minutes last night, is this why not one person so far has stepped forward to deny their own voices and words on the tapes? Or deny they told Woodward what he claims they did?

Thank God for a free press in a free country.

2006-10-02 05:35:53 · 10 answers · asked by Doc Watson 7

It seems so many people have jumped on one bandwaggon vs another, but why don't they simply try and logically come up with answers for themselves.

It should be the responsibility of EVERY single American to make sure his/her country is moving in the direction best suited for her citizens, how can we be expected to do this without total transparency? How can one be expected to DIE for a country that reports to no one? No accountability to those who loose their lives in war, no accountability to it's citizens whose rights get taken away to make them "safer."

Do you understand my problem? I cannot simply beleive, I need to see!

2006-10-02 05:31:35 · 7 answers · asked by Aurred 2

I'm looking for some great answers. And of course some not so great comments from our con/nazi friends.

2006-10-02 05:30:47 · 17 answers · asked by Dems won!!!! 1

and her scam of a marriage is a disgrace to women everywhere? Why would the intelligent portion of the general public really care what questions she has?? Clearly Yahoo answers is desperate!!

2006-10-02 05:27:34 · 20 answers · asked by COblonde 3

Okay, from Mike Wallace's 60 minutes, Woodward says Bush will never withdraw from Iraq even if Laura and Barney are the only supporters of the war.

Now, the president is so firm on his policy.

Is there any law in the U.S. constitution that when the president is going wrong way, the citizens or the congress vote to stop him?

In other words, can we or the congress persons vote to withdraw, despite the president's insistance?

Or the president has the supreme power over the policy and there isn't anything we can do until he completes his presidence?

What are the ways to get out of Iraq, while Bush is still on the chair?

2006-10-02 05:26:21 · 5 answers · asked by davegesprek 1

2006-10-02 05:19:53 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Will you now cast your vote at the election on the great miracle of the price gas now is you are given very logical explanation why it went down but watch how fast it will go up after the election it has happened before something always gets better just before election. and goes back to status quo if the same party stays in office.

2006-10-02 05:17:20 · 6 answers · asked by Lolo 3

Anarchist-heavy democrat-light dem-neutral-light repub-heavy repub-religous radical-fascist



or just don't give a ****.

2006-10-02 05:15:02 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

" I like me some little boys"
Not me personally I cant remember the guys name, Oh man I bet the GOP leaders really are pissed because now a democrat will win that seat.

2006-10-02 05:14:29 · 15 answers · asked by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5

How many of you think Terrorsist could take over the United States. Do they have some kind of huge Navy that I dont know about and are prepairing to invade D.C. How the hell could Terrorist take over the USA?

2006-10-02 05:13:24 · 14 answers · asked by DEEJay 4

true liberals don't like violence but in their e-mails that talk about haveing sex with you and killing your kids



http://answers.yahoo.com/my/profile?show=48446dd6da781610a7e3a7e6556cb935aa

2006-10-02 05:09:36 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-02 05:06:00 · 1 answers · asked by tatum2 1

After listening to a friend whine this weekend about how turned off they are to dirty politics she expressed that she didn't want to go out and vote for either candidate. That made me wonder if that is an intended consequence of the dirty politics, to keep the uncommitted voters away from the polls. Each party knows they have a following of 40% of the voters, leaving about 20% undecided. The negative ads dont convince a dedicated Republican to vote Democratic and vice versa, but it may convince them not to vote at all.

If each candidate keeps the independent voters away and chips into the opposing candidate's base of voters they may win by attrition. Is this an intended or just a consequential goal of the negative politics?

2006-10-02 05:05:56 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-02 05:04:21 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-02 04:59:20 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I cant wait untill they take away our freedom speech.

2006-10-02 04:58:19 · 12 answers · asked by DEEJay 4

"We've made three tragic decisions," Garner told Rumsfeld.
"Really?" Rumsfeld asked.
"Three terrible mistakes," Garner said.
He cited the first two orders Bremer signed when he arrived, the first one banning as many as 50,000 members of Saddam Hussein's Baath Party from government jobs and the second disbanding the Iraqi military. Now there were hundreds of thousands of disorganized, unemployed, armed Iraqis running around.

Third, Garner said, Bremer had summarily dismissed an interim Iraqi leadership group that had been eager to help the United States administer the country in the short term. "Jerry Bremer can't be the face of the government to the Iraqi people. You've got to have an Iraqi face for the Iraqi people."

2006-10-02 04:57:45 · 4 answers · asked by faruqiss 2

2006-10-02 04:57:05 · 18 answers · asked by ? 6

Condi sez the outgoing Clinton staff never briefed her. With Clinton's reputation and his legal status as an impeached president, who would believe his former staffers?

2006-10-02 04:55:21 · 17 answers · asked by Jim from the Midwest 3

2006-10-02 04:53:38 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why is it so important to have International Laws, and why shouldn't anyone who breaks these laws be punished?

2006-10-02 04:49:57 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean you can't really be that blind can you ? Certainly the democratic party no matter how flawed has always been the champion of equal and civil rights ? Black people in the United States are disproportionately poor, occupy our jails, fight our wars and are generally Fu@ked over by a systemic hostile and racist right ? Because Condy Rice is a woman of color (kind of) or because Colen Powell had a moment ? you see what Bush did to him when he was done with him.. shoot he was the only one that had any compassion and they dropped him like a bad habit...
Justice Janice Rogers-Brown, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, Alan Keyes, Ward Connerly, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams,... google any of these black conservatives and tell me where they are working for the poor in this country ?

Do you Think Dr. King would have gone this route?

so what gives?

Money?
a Desire to fit in as the man?
a piece of the pie.. big business style?
or just a smidgen of uncle Tom creeping in ?

2006-10-02 04:49:43 · 14 answers · asked by hardartsystems 3

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/AmericanAttacks.htm

2006-10-02 04:36:47 · 19 answers · asked by julean33 2