2006-10-02 04:57:05 · 18 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I guess they don't read George Will. Go figure. lol This is actually a debate in Seattle right now. That political talk radio should have a monetary value assigned to it and it placed under political contributions. This is exactly what dems are trying to do in Washington. It's horrible.
2006-10-02 05:07:21 · answer #1 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sorry locutus it's not the liberal way. We might however make it easier to sue for slander and thus litigate conservative radio away. The liberals are the ones always suing to defend freedom of speech not the conservatives who only want to hear there view of the world only. So if free speech is your concern it might be in your best interest to join the democratic party where we actually defend free speech not just give lip service saying we do like the conservatives.
2006-10-02 05:15:03 · answer #2 · answered by brian L 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
here is your source. Democrats understand that they'd't compete in a loose marketplace of open innovations because of the fact they haven't any stable innovations. So, the only thank you to maintain human beings from exposing how ridiculous they're is to censor them.
2016-10-18 08:47:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh im sorry I guess I was mistaken when I thought it was republicans who try to censor free speech, by calling people who dont agree with them terrorist lovers.
2006-10-02 05:06:04 · answer #4 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's only free speech if you agree with them. Remember, we are too stupid to think for ourselves and need the Dems to take care of us. If they don't censor right wing opinions we might accidentally vote Republican.
2006-10-02 05:01:56 · answer #5 · answered by SuperMom 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
They haven't in the past.
But they might sue for slander and defamation of character. Which is legal and good. They can do that Irregardless if they are in power or not.
2006-10-02 05:07:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably..
For God sakes, Hillary wanted to censor the internet when Matt Drudge dropped the dime on Bill.
Theyre all about preservation of the Constitution unless it opposes their socialist platform
2006-10-02 05:01:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Bush is the most pro-censerorship president we've had in a while.
The question shows your lazy bias and consistently skewed opinions.You might want to give up your fetish with considering the conservatives to always be right,because its not true.
2006-10-02 05:01:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Most likely! I wonder how burning a flag is free speech, but contributing as much money as you'd like to a candidate's campaign is not? They stomped all over free speech with that move!!
Remember how Gore and his b*tch tried to censor rock-N-roll?
2006-10-02 05:00:28 · answer #9 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Since they already censored abc over their movie, I'm sure more is to come
2006-10-02 05:01:32 · answer #10 · answered by jerry4_fun 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋