Politics - 21 September 2006

President of Pakistan has today revealed in New York that Richard Armitage (***. CIA Director) threatened to 'Bomb Pakistan back to the Stone Ages' if they did not co-operate after 9/11.

The real truth is coming out now. Surprised our friends aren't really our friends.

2006-09-21 08:43:49 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AqM0nWz6oJozI6rk.4EBYW3sy6IX?qid=20060918200401AAseIQI

2006-09-21 08:38:26 · 9 answers · asked by JS 3

I think they are, cause every time you talk politics with them they go insane and get mad about everything, cause liberal people think they know everything!

2006-09-21 08:38:17 · 27 answers · asked by Molly323 5

2006-09-21 08:37:32 · 8 answers · asked by Visions_Of_Johanna 3

Personally I think they should move it to a random place in Anartica and tell no one exactly where it is.

2006-09-21 08:36:17 · 5 answers · asked by Rays Fan 4

Like the dixie chicks does chavez stand a chance of being understood or just attacked by all americans for giving us cheap heating oil in winter and saving american lives .

2006-09-21 08:35:17 · 7 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

If Bush was so evil then why didn't he have Chavez kiled right there in New York?

2006-09-21 08:34:01 · 8 answers · asked by Rays Fan 4

Dont think dat I don't know there are no kinf of UN, but Bush is acting as King of UN, is it not?

2006-09-21 08:31:32 · 3 answers · asked by asru 3

2006-09-21 08:30:17 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

"THEY" ran out of time to debate and act on the illegal situation yet the next thing "THEY" turned to was some emotion-candy (abortion and stemcells) to placate and distract the Right. "THEY" act like Mount Olympus Demigods when "THEY" return home to preen "THEIR" feathers before the voters who sent "THEM" to Washington to represent their interests.

"THEY" presume that "THEY" have to explain the issues to the humyocks back in "THEIR" districts and then educate them about why these idiot voters should just be quiet and accept what "THEY" are doing in Washington DC.

It has become my sincere belief that a T-Model Ford full of REAL CIRCUS CLOWNS--complete with makeup, klaston horns, and butt-paddles--could do a far better job.

Accept or reject my premise and express your own feelings. Best--regardless of position--will get the 10 points.

2006-09-21 08:27:33 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Even though he is a Dem, I still respect this guy.

As Chavez spoke in Harlem, U.S. Rep. Charles Rangel railed against the Venezuelan leader for choosing his New York congressional district to launch an attack on the president of the United States.

"You don't come into my country, you don't come into my congressional district and criticize my president, " Rangel said from Capitol Hill.

He added that "it would be crazy to think that Americans do not feel offended" by Chavez's remarks.

2006-09-21 08:26:59 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Question:How will you vote in November?

Answer:Battle-ax:
I guarantee you one thing whichever party wins the houses it will not be the last election in the United States.
Regardless I do hope and pray that the Republicans win so we can keep thumbing our noses at the Democrats.


"so we can keep thumbing our noses at the Democrats"

Were's the "We need Republicans to serve our country right"?
Out the window,I guess.

That sounds like the worst type of missue of government.Whatever happened to E PLURIBUS UNO-of many,one.Or is that just a bunch of outdated talk?

2006-09-21 08:25:54 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Though the years ive notice that there is alot of anger between the two parties. Democrats call Republicains nazis, and Republicains call Democrats satanists. Is there not a way we can settle our differences by compramising, i mean isn't that what are country was built on. We wouldn't have the bill of rights if it wasn't for compramising. right? My spelling isn't too great sorry.

2006-09-21 08:13:18 · 10 answers · asked by Dk2432 2

2006-09-21 08:12:10 · 17 answers · asked by S H I R A Z 3

2006-09-21 08:04:55 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

House of Representatives?
Senate?
Judiciary Committee?
Oval Office?
Supreme Court?

2006-09-21 08:04:28 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Those five are the main options--the two major parties and the two largest "third" parties, and the "I give up on our nation--voting won't change anything because it's all too late now" option of not voting at all.

Add remarks and/or imaginative cursing as you wish to help me decide how to award the 10 points.

Remember, this COULD BE one of the last national-impact elections America may ever hold, so express yourself freely--which also may one among the last opportunities remaining in your life to express yourself openly and publically without fear of the CIA and/or FBI coming to take you away for private interviews involving water torture and/or your premanent retention as a "person of interest". A caution here, however, is that THEY may be keeping lists of potentially unruly "citizens" for later rounding-up.

(I hope I'm not biasing the results here--at least I am not using an electronic voting machine with no validation printouts, for whatever THOSE are worth, you know.

2006-09-21 07:59:54 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

...and even sit on the Human Rights Commission? Where does this leave the charter of the U.N. (and the League of Nations which preceded it)?

2006-09-21 07:45:38 · 14 answers · asked by flowerchilde 2

Definition of liberalism from Webster's Collegiate dictionary (10th edition):

A political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy [freedom] of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties.

--What is so unpatriotic and anti-American about the above definition that makes considering yourself to be a "liberal" based on this definition so wrong?

2006-09-21 07:44:07 · 25 answers · asked by What I Say 3

ending British rule there, and resulting in the establishment of the U.S.A., why are so many Americans so Anti - French.? Have you forgotten about Lafayette, Chesapeake and the Treaty of Paris? I genuinely don't understand the animosity.

2006-09-21 07:44:03 · 8 answers · asked by pol_douglas 2

Isn’t he the one who won the South Carolina primaries, against Sen. John McCain in 2000 by making a telephone campaign to White Conservatives homes (the night before the Primaries), reminding them that McCain has a “black baby.” Referring to the child John McCain had adopted from Bangladesh?

2006-09-21 07:42:51 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-21 07:41:39 · 17 answers · asked by S H I R A Z 3

i served from 84-92 what about you?

2006-09-21 07:39:04 · 16 answers · asked by Super Shiraz 3

2006-09-21 07:36:40 · 5 answers · asked by Super Shiraz 3

2006-09-21 07:32:43 · 12 answers · asked by Super Shiraz 3

have to convert? No. Would the righteous go to heaven? Yes.

Have you studied all three books with an open heart and listened for god speaking? Could it be that the three are all looking at the same god, but from different directions? What in the three contradict each other? Really?

2006-09-21 07:31:56 · 4 answers · asked by notme 5

does'nt this speak volumes about the charachter of liberals

2006-09-21 07:27:58 · 23 answers · asked by Super Shiraz 3

the un security council is to be expanded and it should represent countries like india, brazil

2006-09-21 07:27:32 · 6 answers · asked by evelyn 3

and why do they defend Islam and condem Christianity?

2006-09-21 07:24:33 · 16 answers · asked by Super Shiraz 3

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Bush administration officials Tuesday dismissed Christian broadcaster Pat Robertson's call for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez as the remarks of a private citizen, but Venezuela accused Robertson of promoting terrorism. (C.N.N.com)

2006-09-21 07:22:11 · 17 answers · asked by pol_douglas 2