English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the un security council is to be expanded and it should represent countries like india, brazil

2006-09-21 07:27:32 · 6 answers · asked by evelyn 3 in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

Yes. Then all votes should be conducted by secret ballot. Then we'd see just how many BS resolutions get passed by the strong doing what they will while the weak suffer what they must.

2006-09-21 07:34:51 · answer #1 · answered by Edward K 3 · 0 0

properly, that's an outstanding question and that i imagine it demonstrates lots of the topic matters with the way the UN protection council is at recent built. India is clearly an important international means. the in reality reason they don't look an eternal member of the UN protection council is because they were truly late to acquire thermonuclear guns. human beings ought to attempt to leap round this situation, even with the indisputable fact that the reality is, the present 5 everlasting individuals were all the earliest to acquire thermonuclear guns. immediately the issue with letting India in is that it ought to set a foul precedent. Pakistan, Israel, and North Korea ought to also attempt to justify being everlasting individuals too. really of including India to the UN protection council, we probable desire to redesign how the protection council works.

2016-11-23 13:20:44 · answer #2 · answered by rosenberg 4 · 0 0

Some veto powers should be eliminated, but the US and anyone who agrees with us on any given issue should retain their veto power. Stupid answer maybe, but I'm just in this one for the points.

2006-09-21 07:32:54 · answer #3 · answered by danl747 5 · 0 0

I think the UN should be abolished. It is weak and ineffectual. Over ran with commie, pinko weirdos. Nowhere near what its intent or potential could be. Turn the building into housing for homeless people.

2006-09-21 07:32:52 · answer #4 · answered by Spirit Walker 5 · 0 0

no i think it should abolish period . it is a do nothing entity that can't get any thing done .and for this country to pay 3 billion a year on this $hit is not right when it's not in our favor

2006-09-21 07:33:07 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

YES! BUT WHO CARES .... US IS GIVING VETO TO ILLEGAL OCCUPATION OF ISRAEL!

US AND ISRAEL ..... BIGGEST CULPRIT TO THE WORLD PEACE! AND AXIS OF EVIL!

2006-09-21 07:39:44 · answer #6 · answered by David F 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers