If Bush was so evil then why didn't he have Chavez kiled right there in New York?
2006-09-21 08:34:01 · 8 answers · asked by Rays Fan 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Chavez is a moron. He got a chance to say something that could be constructive on the world stage; but instead, he stoop down to calling names and making accusations that are irrelevant. The UN is just becoming rediculous. Via the UN anyone can just go in front of the world and make a big drama, unproven accusations and call names without any consequences.. this includes Bush as well.
If these leaders had something intelligible to say. Then I would think it would be worth listening to. Right now, they seem just like a bunch of immature children.
2006-09-21 08:48:41 · answer #1 · answered by Minh 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree with Chavez. Bush thinks he is the ruler of the world.
2006-09-21 15:37:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
yes, Chavez is 80% correct about Bush.
I agree with his comments.
As Bush is not 100% devil, Chavez is alive for this.
2006-09-21 15:39:57 · answer #3 · answered by asru 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Chavez showes his ignorance all the time.
2006-09-21 15:36:33 · answer #4 · answered by hexa 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes
2006-09-21 15:35:53 · answer #5 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Evil is mostly sneaky
2006-09-21 15:41:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
BUSH = DEVIL!
CHAVEZ = MESSENGER WHO TELLS BUSH IS A DEVIL!
2006-09-21 15:37:44 · answer #7 · answered by David F 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
its amazing how treasonous the liberals are
2006-09-21 15:38:34 · answer #8 · answered by S H I R A Z 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋