English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 17 September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

killing nuns?

2006-09-17 12:01:45 · 17 answers · asked by davy l 1

change his name from Osama just to infitrate the liberal party and take over from the inside? Seems to be working very well.

2006-09-17 11:59:31 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or should the question be: Why do militants cowardly use toddlers as human shields?

And who is more disgusting, the militants who use toddlers and children as human shields and propaganda tools, or the Israeli government who is fulfilling its duty of protecting its citizens from militants?

2006-09-17 11:32:35 · 22 answers · asked by BrianthePigEatingInfidel 4

I mean, murder is illegal, but people still do it in back alleys using guns and knives, right? So why not make it legal and safe, and regulated by the government. If you want to murder someone you can just take them to a murder clinic and have a professional do it, that way you don't risk harming yourself in the event the subject tries to resist.

If you outlaw murder, only outlaws will commit murder.

2006-09-17 11:17:53 · 8 answers · asked by BrianthePigEatingInfidel 4

2006-09-17 11:11:57 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Can a person with a third grade level or equivilent be president.

2006-09-17 11:11:12 · 18 answers · asked by rc 3

One who can sell an open, full septic tank as a bed of roses and succeed ?

2006-09-17 11:03:06 · 8 answers · asked by rc 3

2006-09-17 11:03:03 · 15 answers · asked by diamonds_are_forever<3 3

If it is, then there is no issue. It would be no different than a person cutting off their own finger.

But if it isn't, then there is a whole separate set of issues that arise. Since a fetus is clearly a genetically distinct human, it clearly is not her, so the argument that it is "her body" does not apply.

The only option left is that she owns the fetus like she does a book, or a chair. Does the woman "own" the fetus like she does a chair, which she has a right to smash if she chooses? And when does her ownership right end?

Does a woman "own" the fetus because it depends on her for life? If that's the case, why are abortions for 1 year olds not legal? They depend on the mother just as much.

Or is it because she cannot transfer ownership and responsibility while it is a fetus, but she can when it is 1 year old? But what happens if no one wants the one year old? Does she retain the right of abortion?

2006-09-17 11:02:35 · 16 answers · asked by BrianthePigEatingInfidel 4

People say that the difference between choosing to murder and choosing to have an abortion is that murder is illegal and abortion is not.

Slavery was once legal. Was it right?
Child sacrifice was legal in some cultures in the past. Does that make it right?
Stoning people to death for petty offenses is legal in Iran. Does that make it right?

2006-09-17 10:54:48 · 20 answers · asked by BrianthePigEatingInfidel 4

I am.
I believe I have a right to choose to beat your children.
I believe I have a right to choose to steal your car.
I believe I have a right to choose to burn your house down.
I believe I have a right to choose to skin your cat.
I believe I have a right to choose to set you on fire.
I believe I have a right to choose to mow down crowds of people on sidewalks with my car.
I believe I have a right to choose to burn piles of tires and pollute the air.
I believe I have a right to choose to fart on an elevator.
I believe I have a right to choose to kill you.

Pro-choice. The right to choose whatever it is I choose to do regardless of moral or ethical concerns.

2006-09-17 10:40:38 · 32 answers · asked by BrianthePigEatingInfidel 4

Voting for Bush is like running in the Special Olympics - Even if you win, you're still retarded

2006-09-17 10:39:11 · 14 answers · asked by ohdarliingletgo 2

2006-09-17 10:32:11 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think pro-life should not be included in this argument.

its not about being pro-life; being pro-CHOICE does not make you anti-LIFE. However being pro-life does make you anti-choice, in this issue at least.

I personally do not believe in abortions for myself because of my religion however i do believe in the FREEDOM to choose. (the US is about being free, is it not?)

People who are anti-choice, in my opionion, do not have a reasonable argument. What do you think?

2006-09-17 10:30:51 · 20 answers · asked by juliette 1

reallity to hard to deal with or what?

2006-09-17 10:26:59 · 19 answers · asked by Roy F 1

as our pres tries to get info from these people , congress blocks his way, macain and his do gooders tell us we cant infringe their human rights, what about our rights

2006-09-17 10:25:43 · 24 answers · asked by pat o 2

2006-09-17 10:24:40 · 11 answers · asked by display 1

and why?

2006-09-17 10:21:25 · 24 answers · asked by juliette 1

If there was a huge consensus in Iraq to keep the American troops in there, and they were helping the Iraqi's, would you think it acceptable to keep the troops in there?

2006-09-17 10:18:24 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-17 10:15:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Then I heard that their Crime Rate is Very Low, especially Home Break-Ins---is this True too?

2006-09-17 10:11:47 · 3 answers · asked by maguyver727 7

Majority of Conservatives are envolved in Wife beating incidents!

2006-09-17 10:02:38 · 20 answers · asked by freetinka 1

I think they really were the school bullies.....that behavior infects every aspect of life..

2006-09-17 10:01:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-17 09:53:35 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-17 09:52:57 · 9 answers · asked by 6th Finger 2

regardless of the circemstances?

2006-09-17 09:52:42 · 16 answers · asked by Bobobo-bo Bobobo 1

fedest.com, questions and answers