Politics - 13 September 2006

2006-09-13 09:17:16 · 13 answers · asked by Ukasco 1

Would you support giving him a throne?

2006-09-13 09:15:50 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

and be honest.most people who hate muslims now.didn't even pay attention to muslims before 9/11.

2006-09-13 09:15:32 · 39 answers · asked by Anonymous

The war on terror is just a Madison Avenue slogan. There is no end game to it. There will be always terrorism as defined by one side or another. Jobs are being outsourced. Middle class Americans are earning less or taking more jobs to stay where they are. A weak middle class leads to societal instability. All you have to do is look around. Countries that have a small well-to-do population and a large socio-economic population at the bottom suffer from political unrest. This won't happen over night, but like a lobster being slowly boiled, it is happening. President Bush before he was elected said that protecting the middle class was his greatest conceren. The tax cuts belie this. The wealthiest benefitted the most. Tax cuts are meaningless if your job has been outsourced.

2006-09-13 09:13:39 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hello everyone,

Not to bore you but I'm writing several papers on the issue of capital punishment in America. I chose this topic because though I tend to think of myself anti-death penalty, I sometimes find myself questioning it. I figured by the time I'm done writing my papers I'll have a better idea of my viewpoint on this matter.

So, that being said, I was wondering what everyone else thinks about capital punishment.. Is it moral/just? Let me know what you think!

2006-09-13 08:50:28 · 22 answers · asked by brokemypace 1

do they differ in foreign and internal policies?

2006-09-13 08:46:28 · 14 answers · asked by evelyn 3

EXCLUSIVE...9/11 Debate:

Loose Change Filmmakers vs. Popular Mechanics Editors of "Debunking 9/11 Myths"

See it Here: http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/11/1345203

2006-09-13 08:44:32 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why do they refer to what the republicans and in general the democrats as well consistently institute in economic policy as laissez-faire? They are attempting to get rid of any kind of regulation, and social services as well, including attempts to privatize social security, etc., but on the other side they keep instituting more and more corporate welfare? Tax cuts and favors, states bidding through lowering taxes to attract businesses, etc...

My question is how does this count as laissez-faire? How can they have it both ways? If it's laissez-faire, if it's about competition, why do they keep bailing corporations out when they bankrupt themselves? And how is deregulation involved in laissez-faire economics?

The closest thing to a completely laissez-faire economic system would be the bare minimum of patent/copyright law, the bare minimum of social services to the people, and absolutely no tax bidding/corporate welfare/government grants, etc., wouldn't it? And unrelated, they would

2006-09-13 08:40:42 · 4 answers · asked by Aleksandr 4

2006-09-13 08:40:19 · 2 answers · asked by edubya 5

So who's heir to that jumbo throne Rush once sat on?

2006-09-13 08:40:13 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Let the drum roll.............The MOST STUPIDEST AWARD goes to the people who voted for Bush and still in denial and think that Bush is a good president!!!!!!???????

2006-09-13 08:39:02 · 17 answers · asked by Believe me 3

There have always been terrorists. The day will never come when some people don't resort to terrorism as a means of promoting their beliefs. Shouldn't the war be called the war against Muslim extremists? We are not targeting the IRA or the Tamils of Sri Lanka or the Basque separatists. We are very selective in which terrorists we go after. How will we ever know if we have won?

2006-09-13 08:37:06 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

I NEED them!!!

2006-09-13 08:36:37 · 11 answers · asked by fireburn 1

2006-09-13 08:35:15 · 13 answers · asked by fireburn 1

2006-09-13 08:32:53 · 6 answers · asked by fireburn 1

Would you ban the home production of such drugs as meth and have large pharmecutical companies like Pfizer create meth in sterile labs to be sold over the counter at local convenience stores? Would it prevent home property values from declining having avoided environmental and health hazards from dangerous mixtures of gases and chemicals?

2006-09-13 08:31:06 · 4 answers · asked by Chuck Dhue 4

What does their party stand for and such?

2006-09-13 08:23:55 · 10 answers · asked by John G 5

if we sued them for all the hard earned & they've usurped
from us, plus interest?

2006-09-13 08:19:53 · 5 answers · asked by redreverser 1

Could you explain why they are or are not useless from your point of view?

2006-09-13 08:17:57 · 14 answers · asked by theblondebrain2000 1

2006-09-13 08:17:07 · 2 answers · asked by Kasra 2

People have said this.I don't know.

2006-09-13 08:17:02 · 8 answers · asked by John G 5

Just a tip from an ex soldier, there are a lot of people who tell you what to think and say...

2006-09-13 08:12:04 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

He looks unstoppable. I like him and I'm a Democrat. Hillary I don't think can win because that will mean putting Bill back in the White House. There are other Democrats I like more than McCain but I don't see them winning.

2006-09-13 08:11:18 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Neocon nut who works with me and tries to convert me to be a Neoconservative (DAILY)…and claims to be a good moral Christian…doesn’t seem to be able to take his eyes off of the tattoo on the left hip (that says “Liberal to the Core”) while I’m sitting at my bench running an assay. So the real question is: what are so called “wholesome Neocons”, doing checking out married Liberal chicks? I thought you guys considered us the anti-Christ?

2006-09-13 08:07:16 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

We were just talking about this and now we're at an impasse...there had to have been at least 1 or 2 privately run companies in the former USSR no?

2006-09-13 08:03:59 · 13 answers · asked by myapt5c 2

You may disagree with my headline, but you cant dispute the fact that they are clearly against Christian values. From Abortion, to Gay Marrage, all the way to welfare. When did this happen?

2006-09-13 07:57:27 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do You believe in Eminent domain?

eminent domain 

Law. the power of the state to take private property for public use with payment of compensation to the owner.

eminent domain
n.
The right of a government to appropriate private property for public use, usually with compensation to the owner.

em·i·nent do·main
Pronunciation: 'e-m&-n&nt-
Function: noun
: the right of the government to take property from a private owner for public use by virtue of the superior dominion of its sovereignty over all lands within its jurisdiction



I seem to be in a minority when it comes to this... People in my last question, even though they were libertarian on other issues seemed to favor this law... I howeve dissagree with it. I believe that if the gov't wants to build a highway, they should OFFER just compensation to the landowners. If the landowners don't want to give in, then they should build around that specific area.

I actualy don't think it is the gov'ts purpose to build roads, that should be done by private organizations.

2006-09-13 07:54:40 · 9 answers · asked by zack32460 3

crazy isn't it?

2006-09-13 07:54:26 · 8 answers · asked by abascious 1

A number of similar minded ultraRights are not here now.It's 3pm
EST. Are they all convining together?

They are suspicious absent,and all at the same time.

Group therapy, or just a conspiracy theory?

2006-09-13 07:52:50 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-13 07:51:51 · 6 answers · asked by mohamed r 1