Politics - 13 September 2006

he left Mary Jo to die or is it true that feces floats?

2006-09-13 14:02:38 · 13 answers · asked by halfbright 5

do what makes you happy. Everyone is different

2006-09-13 13:59:00 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

I want the FBI, CIA and whoever else needs to, to eavesdrop on terrorists, but I also want the president to follow the law.

The FISA law says a warrant is required within 72 hours of a domestic wiretap. It gived the Presidents flexibility to act quickly if he needs to, but at the same times keep him accountable to follow the law. If Bush thinks 72 hours is not enough time I would support changing the law to give him more time, but Bush has opposed any changes to the law. Instead he simply chose to ignore the law.

Why have Republicans, who jumped on the tiniest violations by Clinton, given Bush a pass to violate any law he pleases?

If in 2008 we have President Hillary, do you expect the Republicans will let her do much warrantless wiretapping?

2006-09-13 13:55:47 · 19 answers · asked by arvis3 4

2006-09-13 13:49:01 · 10 answers · asked by Jack S. Buy more ammo! 4

new planet as soon as this one becomes unlivable OR is it because they really don't care how scorching, polluted, disgusting the planet that they hand over to their grandchildren is?

2006-09-13 13:43:49 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-13 13:39:35 · 20 answers · asked by Jack S. Buy more ammo! 4

their beheadings, car bombs, suicide bombs, kidnappings, suicide planes, hijackings, school bus bombings, missile lobbing into civillian populations etc According to the apologists these people's behavior is to be rewarded with policy change. What do you think?

2006-09-13 13:36:53 · 13 answers · asked by   6

AND NON PARTISAN?

2006-09-13 13:31:58 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060913/ap_on_sc/warming_sea_ice

2006-09-13 13:30:32 · 17 answers · asked by The_Dark_Knight 4

She is quoted today saying that Christianity is as dangerous as radical Islam. Now come on!! Even all you paranoid liberals out there that think the Right is run from the pulpit have to admit this is pure stupidity. And then the lemming audience applauds her when she says it.

How many Christian churches are hijacking planes and threatening to put an end to Western civilization as we know it?

A sad, sad statement on the current status of thinking in America, in my opinion.

2006-09-13 13:22:18 · 19 answers · asked by obviously_you'renotagolfer 5

2006-09-13 13:17:05 · 8 answers · asked by Chris G 1

The Dems plan for Iraq is to turn it over as soon as possible to a trained Iraqi Army and get out of Dodge.

The Rep. plan for Iraq is to turn it over as soon as possible to a trained Iraqi Army and get out of Dodge.

What is everyone arguing about?

2006-09-13 13:16:28 · 5 answers · asked by MEL T 7

2006-09-13 13:09:38 · 19 answers · asked by   6

and what is one major defense issue involved with the Republican Party and what is there position on it?

2006-09-13 13:03:59 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Bush has been recruiting terrorists and making enemies for us all over the place. He says we have to fight the terrorists in Iraq.. there were no Al Qaeda in Iraq before he went mad and invaded!!

2006-09-13 13:02:26 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm talking about people who attribute everyone else's motives to "fear." Why can't someone decide that a certain policy is a good and rational solution to a real and existing problem? Why do some people feel the need to condemn that decision as being made out of fear?

The kind of people I am talking about are the ones that say that I am wrong for supporting actions against terrorists because I am motivated by some amorphous, uncaused "fear," implying that if I weren't afraid, then I wouldn't support these actions. Truthfully, the chances that I will be caught in a terrorist attack are quite slim. However, I don't deny they exist, nor do I deny their motives.

I hate that disparaging phrase "led by fear," as if there is nothing at all anyone should be concerned about. It doesn't mean that I am being led by some blind, irrational fear. It means that that I see a real and credible danger that needs to be addressed.

2006-09-13 12:50:04 · 5 answers · asked by BrianthePigEatingInfidel 4

Late comedian Bill Hicks did “Why is it when there is some tragidy I have to hear 'OMG the children, the poor children...how many cihildren were in Waco, Texas? How many children were in the plane crash? WTF happened to caring about all people? What is it, when individuals reach 18 they no longer qualify for your F***king love list?!” Comments and/or input?

2006-09-13 12:41:15 · 7 answers · asked by Book Diva 2

the american goverment or the terrors
and please tell me what do think is the reason

2006-09-13 12:38:51 · 14 answers · asked by fahd s 1

Yah thats self explanatory eh?

2006-09-13 12:18:39 · 6 answers · asked by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5

2006-09-13 12:17:11 · 9 answers · asked by NaughtyBoy 3

Specifically, the ones who were saying that it was full of lies? Did any of you actually watch it? Because I did, and I didn't see anything glaringly wrong with it.

It is true that Clinton treated terrorism and al Qaeda as a law enforcement problem, and he was overly concerned with the legality of taking bin Laden out. And Madeline Albright DID warn the Pakis that we were launching cruise missiles over their territory, which probably tipped him off.

2006-09-13 12:14:48 · 17 answers · asked by BrianthePigEatingInfidel 4

2006-09-13 12:11:29 · 49 answers · asked by Anonymous

For his part, Mr. Ahmadinejad said, “Iran will give its assistance to establish complete security in Iraq, because Iraq’s security is Iran’s security.” It was not clear what form Iranian support on security would take, or how it would be regarded by the American authorities here.

All those deaths and huge amounts of $$$ spent
and now Iraq is now turning to Iran for security help!
Sounds like Iraq wants USA out and wants to turn
to Iran for help...
Again, are the Republicans happy with Iraq's
turning to what Bush calls AXIS OF EVIL?

2006-09-13 12:02:34 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-13 12:01:42 · 6 answers · asked by edubya 5

More than 50 vets decided to run and all but one are Democrats. Why didn't they run as Republicans? What does that say about veterans support for the commander in chief?

"They call themselves the Band of Brothers, about 50 men - and a few women - all Democrats, all opposed to the Bush administration's handling of Iraq, and all military veterans.
One more thing: They're all running for Congress this year."

"The Republicans have one Iraq war vet running for Congress, Van Taylor of Texas, who is trying to knock off Rep. Chet Edwards (D)."

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0222/p01s03-uspo.html

2006-09-13 11:44:32 · 13 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

PLLLLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZZZZZz !!!!!!!! help

2006-09-13 11:37:19 · 8 answers · asked by skaterchick4212@yahoo.com 1

Or is it just more mud-slingin?

2006-09-13 11:35:06 · 20 answers · asked by afriendof CLIFFy D 2

That guy is crazy.

The only time I listen to Rush Limbaugh is when I need a good laugh!

Does anyone out there pay attention to him, and what he has to say?

2006-09-13 11:18:46 · 24 answers · asked by Villain 6

In the ocean "lets respect it, not collect it".

http://www.cagreens.org/

2006-09-13 11:04:48 · 16 answers · asked by Dr.Feelgood 5

why is it that nobody knows that the terrorists are paying the liberal democrats to hit Bush anywhere they can????

2006-09-13 10:55:16 · 13 answers · asked by rising p 1