2006-09-13 13:39:35 · 20 answers · asked by Jack S. Buy more ammo! 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Guaranteed. And I would bet money that no matter what weapon was used they will still call it an AK-47, just to get more people against assault rifles.
2006-09-13 13:57:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'd say very good. Of course the media would blame the shooter long before blaming the actual perpertrater, which would bw the parents.
2006-09-13 20:42:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Highly unlikely. The media blames everyone, not everything. Besides, the gun is something that is to be used as a defensive weapon and responsibly and people should know that.
2006-09-13 20:44:48 · answer #3 · answered by shea_8705 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally, depending why the shooting occured, they should blame those who knew or caused the mental instability of the child. If something like that happens, it's often due to the child having reached, and gone over the edge.
2006-09-13 21:53:02 · answer #4 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The shooter must face the charge not the gun. Anpother imbecile with fire arms that has no business with it.
I have firearms and they are kept safe in the cabinet and when I go hunting I usually end up buying my meat at the store.
2006-09-13 20:45:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They would blame Grand Theft Auto for facilitating the boys in methods of killing. In no way would they blame the parents of the shooters. Of corse, they have absolutely NO responsibility in the actions and lives of their children
2006-09-13 20:44:49 · answer #6 · answered by chris 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It was in canada, and one of my friends up there, had one of her friends shot. (hes all right as of now) I don't know, Canada might be turning around after all this recent bull-crap they have had to deal with, and the media might blame the shooter this time
2006-09-13 20:42:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The media won't blame anyone. It was in Canada and the American media rarely covers international news for more that sixty seconds.
2006-09-13 20:41:42 · answer #8 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Canada didnt have so many gun control laws then maybe some law abiding citizen could have stopped the shooter before he shot so many people
2006-09-13 20:45:07 · answer #9 · answered by TLJaguar 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It couldn't happen in Canada because it is against the law to have a gun there.
2006-09-13 21:02:03 · answer #10 · answered by kdub ken 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋