English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

EXCLUSIVE...9/11 Debate:

Loose Change Filmmakers vs. Popular Mechanics Editors of "Debunking 9/11 Myths"

See it Here: http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/11/1345203

2006-09-13 08:44:32 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

Sounds good! These conspiracy nuts need a good slapping.

Edit: I just finished watching it, and those two Loose Change guys were total a**holes. All they did was call the two SA guys liars. The SA guys provided evidence, they completely debunked the conspiracy nonsense, and every time the LC guys were backed into a corner, they changed the subject.

At one point, when they were talking about the Pentagon, Meigs, the Scientific American guy, completely demolished the conspiracy nut theory, and Jason Bermas, the particularly more assholish guy of the nutty twosome, went off on some tangent about Norman Mineta and Dick Cheney, having absolutely nothing to do with anything they were talking about to that point.

If they didn't get totally trounced by the SA guys, the nutbars would still not have made their case because they were such d1cks.

2006-09-13 08:48:18 · answer #1 · answered by BrianthePigEatingInfidel 4 · 6 1

Check out this site: http://www.wanttoknow.info/9-11timeline60pg

Its a time line of events surrounding 9/11 from the 70's to the present and each entry has references from the main stream media to back it up. No theories, just facts. Excellent reading.

2006-09-13 09:24:48 · answer #2 · answered by Jagatkarta 3 · 1 1

The Loose Change filmmakers are three 20-year-old kids. One has some college education, and the other two have none. Not one of the three has any expertise in any professional or academic field whatsoever.

Yet still, there are some people who are even stupider than they are. Stupid enough to believe what they created using a laptop. Too bad they didn't produce anything constructive that could have made a positive difference.

2006-09-13 08:54:15 · answer #3 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 3 3

Popular Mechanics will win hands down...why?

Because the makers of loose change will respond to every fact PM supplies with this quote or a derivitive of it" Thats a lie" or They're Lying" or the ever popular "They're Lying Liars"

Wait and see and mark my words. Loose change doesnt present any scientific facts..just extreme left wing tin foil hat conspiracy propaganda.

2006-09-13 09:12:39 · answer #4 · answered by smitty031 5 · 3 2

theory vs facts The truth has been told now all of the weak minded lying left needs to get over it!!!!

2006-09-13 11:48:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Marijuana and beer induced fantasy vs. Scientific fact. My bet is with Popular Mechanics.

2006-09-13 08:51:23 · answer #6 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 4 2

hey taco boy time to get over the bullsh*t theories you moron

2006-09-13 13:30:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

no one will ever know the truth ......if the government can cover up "area 51" and say it doesnt exist then something such as the events of 9/11 can be covered up as well.

2006-09-13 08:51:38 · answer #8 · answered by jihad 1 · 0 5

Conspiracy nuts vs. scientific evidence? My money is on the conspiracy nuts.

2006-09-13 08:57:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers