Politics - 18 August 2006

.....are just a means of diverting attention from the Falkland Islands issue?

2006-08-18 07:29:26 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

"Bush Family - Linked with Nazi's"
“Bush - Nazi Dealings Continued Until 1951”
http://www.nhgazette.com/cgi-bin/NHGstore.cgi?user_action=detail&catalogno=NN_Bush_Nazi_2
www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html
http://www.rense.com/general42/bshnazi.htm

"I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on. And you know, I thought it was pilot error" ???

These observations make it appear that George Bush had access to coverage of the attacks that the public did not. As some have pointed out, George Bush could not have seen the first plane hit the tower live on commercial television, since it was a surprise attack and no television station was covering that area when the first plane hit.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020105-3.html

President’s oil companies funded by Bin Laden family and wealthy Saudis who financed Osama bin Laden"

Bush admits to no 9/11 and Iraq link.
Faked intelligence on Iraq. WMD and other!

2006-08-18 07:20:19 · 22 answers · asked by BT 1

Iran is ging to be set up ......it will appear that there was a strike against Israel that was shot down by US forces in Iraq and Israel will have the justification it wants to nuke Iran .....the US will set up a nuclear bomb attack in the USA that will look like Iran did it . It may be foiled at the last minute and it may be allowed to go off in a suspiciously democratic region - perhaps Ca .....With this the US will appear to have no choice but to do what it always wanted and go after Iran .

The propaganda of Aug 22 is a set up for the justification of Iran's destruction.

9/11 got the US into Iraq and 8/22 will get them into Iran

Possible Not possible?

2006-08-18 07:16:41 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-18 07:13:32 · 11 answers · asked by Dr MK Khaishagi 2

2006-08-18 07:00:04 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

some of his best material was on Bush.

2006-08-18 06:57:59 · 13 answers · asked by abascious 1

Stephen Harper is quoted as saying about AIDS: "...Prime Minister Stephen Harper said it wouldn't be the right time to make announcements because the issue had become 'so politicized' . . ." (ref. http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/08/18/aids-conference.html )
This admission that he, a politician, is not prepared to deal with the politics of an important issue like AIDS seems to be an admission of his incompetence. In general, one would think that politicians would be prepared to deal with political issues. Don't you think that it would be better for the country if he stepped aside and let people who would be willing to deal with the politics of important issues take charge of our government?

2006-08-18 06:54:26 · 2 answers · asked by Sincere Questioner 4

2006-08-18 06:50:09 · 9 answers · asked by Dr MK Khaishagi 2

I will give what I believe to be the correct answer in a week.

2006-08-18 06:47:45 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I really feel strange about the reason for this big hatred inside the hearts of the Arabs and Muslims in the world towards Israel.

I may understand the reason for disagreeing with the united states and burning its flags in demonstration, but why do they hate Israel.
Since the establishment of Israel in 1948, there were almost 7 wars by the Arabs against the state of Israel.

I met with many Arabs in my life, and I discussed the middle east problem with them. The clear hatred in their harts towarsd Israel is unexplainable.......

what do you think, is there something I don't know about this conflect.

2006-08-18 06:44:54 · 25 answers · asked by lrantisi 2

and why?

2006-08-18 06:43:48 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-18 06:36:08 · 11 answers · asked by Arash 2

It shows you how stupid some people are. Especially when we have one of the leaders of the attack in custody, and he admitted to doing it.

2006-08-18 06:35:57 · 25 answers · asked by TJ 4

2006-08-18 06:35:34 · 11 answers · asked by ANDREW L 3

Bill Clinton bombed more countries than any peacetime president. He bombed Yugoslavia without the UN's approval, he also bombed Sudan, wiping out a medicine factory, he bombed Iraq almost daily, Somalia, and Afghanistan. Why was it ok for Clinton but not for Bush especially after 9-11? now let's hear the stupid liberal answers!

2006-08-18 06:35:14 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Sarasota Herald-Tribune 11/11/2000:

"The Bush family fortune came from the Third Reich."
-John Loftus, former US Justice Dept. Nazi War Crimes investigator and President of the Florida Holocaust Museum

4/14/1990 New York Times quotes President George Bush as stating, "Lets forgive the Nazi war criminals."

"George W's grandfather Prescott Bush was among the chief American fundraisers for the Nazi Party in the 1930s and '40s. In return he was handsomely rewarded with plenty of financial opportunities from the Nazis helping to create the fortune and legacy that his son George inherited."

2006-08-18 06:29:59 · 41 answers · asked by BT 1

I think we need to start keeping an eye on them and reporting their actions. They wish to undermine the values this country was founded on. Not to mention the bill of rights and constitution. we need to watch them closely and with a fare amount of scrutiny as they are able and willing to sink to new lows in order to further their fascist agenda.

Don't let it happen
if you aren with us then you are against us republicans..
love it or leave it

2006-08-18 06:29:17 · 10 answers · asked by Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam 2

and his failings?

2006-08-18 06:24:54 · 16 answers · asked by PARKERD 7

2006-08-18 06:23:52 · 26 answers · asked by incredible22 3

Even muslim terorist groups are different, they are not united, muslims has also different kinds, Shiete, Sonni, vahabbi, etc. and also have different approches through their religion, extremist, moderate, secular, non-religious, etc. and also have different political views, ani western, conservative, leftist, progressive etc.
If we consider all of them the same and we blame them all for actions of a group of them, then we have to fight to 1000000000 people not 10000 or more and less. Why we don't recognize them?

2006-08-18 06:23:28 · 4 answers · asked by albandazole 2

2006-08-18 06:18:12 · 9 answers · asked by nikki 1

It is well known that there is a greater incidence of PNE in liberals whose parents were enuretic compared to those families with no parental history. If both parents were bed-wetters, their children have a 77% chance of having NE; and if only one parent had been enuretic, the incidence drops to 43%

2006-08-18 06:17:12 · 9 answers · asked by Heroic Liberal 1

2006-08-18 06:16:21 · 2 answers · asked by zclifton2 6

Nocturnal enuresis (NE), the involuntary passing of urine during sleep after the age at which bladder control would normally be anticipated, is a widespread and potentially disabling disorder for liberals. The treatment of NE constitutes several approaches and its pathophysiology remains unsolved. Careful consideration should be given to the work-up of NE since there may be concurrent symptoms that require attention either before or in conjunction with the treatment. Patient/family education and a cooperative approach usually produce the most favorable results in treating NE.

2006-08-18 06:13:14 · 8 answers · asked by Heroic Liberal 1

theyre like the crazy guy running around yelling.. :"WERE ALL GONNA DIEEE" AAHHH.
They believe the gospel according to bush.
they take everything at face value.
If i waqs the leader of the country Id thank god for people like republicans because no matter what i said or did they would believe me and support me.

2006-08-18 06:12:47 · 17 answers · asked by Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam 2

They both hated the Jews and wanted to wipe them off the face of the Earth.

2006-08-18 06:10:02 · 13 answers · asked by TJ 4

pleas tell what you thing, can this be true, can everything be just a big lie.
pleas be fair and share me what you think.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8176646015403062862&q=loose+change+2

2006-08-18 06:09:03 · 5 answers · asked by drnael2000 2

Here is an email I just received, no idea why?

From: S H I R A Z

Subject: dont lie

Message: stop lying you like like a whore

Never emailed this person (?) in my life! Who is this, and does he send these emails to others?

2006-08-18 06:08:28 · 13 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.

Bush's Dad helped Sadam Hussein & Bin Laden rise to power?

Bush Jr. faked terrorists - staged 9/11?

** THINK CAREFULLY BEFORE RESPONDING TO THIS QUESTION. REFRAIN FROM CHILDISH MANNERISM AND MINDLESS RHETORIC. BY REFUTING THESE FACTS AS A MEER JOKE? IS NOT ONLY AN INSULT TO YOUR ABILITY TO KNOW RIGHT FROM WRONG BUT AN INSULT TO THE THOUSANDS WHO HAVE PERISHED IN THIS WAR ON TERROR AND ALL THE OTHER WARS BEFORE IT. THESE FACTS ARE NO JOKE, AND WE **** YOU NOT, THE BUSH FAMILY ARE JUST #£%$%%£^£%!!!

We love Americans. We just don't love your fuhrer. ** AGREED? **

Peace.

2006-08-18 06:02:56 · 52 answers · asked by BT 1

Rule # 1: In the Middle East, it is always the Arabs that attack first, and it's always Israel who defends itself. This is called "retaliation".

Rule # 2: The Arabs, whether Palestinians or Lebanese, are not allowed to Kill Israelis. This is called "terrorism" but Israel has the right to kill Arab civilians; this is called "self-defense", or "collateral damage".

Rule # 3: When Israel kills too many civilians. The Western world calls for restraint. but if Hezbullah kills a number of soldiers they call for wiping it out. This is called the "reaction of the international community".

Rule # 4: Palestinians and Lebanese do not have the right to capture Israeli military, not even a limited number, not even 1 or 2 but Israel has the right to capture as many Palestinians as they want (Palestinians: around 10000 to date, 300 of which are children, Lebanese: 1000s to date, being held without trial). There is no limit; there is no need for proof of guilt or trial. All that is needed is the magic word: "terrorism"

Rule # 5: When you say "Hezbollah", always be sure to add "supported by Syria and Iran" but when you say "Israel", never say "supported by the USA, the UK and other European countries", for people (God forbid) might believe this is not an equal conflict

Rule # 6: When it comes to Israel, don't mention the words "occupied territories", "UN resolutions", "Geneva conventions". This could distress the audience of Fox.

Rule # 7: Israelis speak better English than Arabs. This is why we let them speak out as much as possible, so that they can explain rules 1 through 9. This is called "neutral journalism".

Rule # 8: If you don't agree with these rules or if you favor the Arab side over the Israeli side, you must be a very dangerous anti-Semite. You may even have to make a public apology if you express your honest opinion (isn't democracy wonderful?)

2006-08-18 05:58:20 · 8 answers · asked by incredible22 3