English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-18 06:35:34 · 11 answers · asked by ANDREW L 3 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

Good race between hitler and stalin. Hitler caused the world great problems in a world war, as well as the genocide of Jews. On the other hand Stalin killed many more of his own people than Hitler, and his system outlived the dictator, extending human rights abuse to all of Eastern Europe another 40 years.

One advantage of Naziism over Communism [from a free world point of view] is that it is much harder to sell the idea of a "super race" than the idea of "equality for all". Communism adopted the aspects of religion which is the more powerful weapon in the hands of an evil dictator. The world is still full of well intentioned people who believe communism a great philosophy, just badly handled by the Russians. Nazi supporters are much harder to find.

Close call, but I would give the nod to Stalin based on being a more effective evil doer, with arguably a greater reach in time and harm. As a ww2 generation, however, it is pretty difficult for me to pass over Hitler for anybody in the evil trade.

2006-08-18 07:00:36 · answer #1 · answered by Fred R 2 · 2 0

this is the most idiotic question i've seen in awhile. How do Clinton or Bush even compare to Stalin and Hitler?? I'm guessing you picked Clinton and Bush because you don't remember any presidents previous to those 2.


...oh, and my answer would be Hitler just barely edging out Stalin.

2006-08-18 06:48:47 · answer #2 · answered by theman 2 · 1 1

Who doesn't love bush? It's a toss up between Stalin and Hitler they both did pretty much the same thing, but Stalin was alittle more quiet about it and better at it.

2006-08-18 06:42:34 · answer #3 · answered by brantibrooks1 2 · 1 0

Ummm... HITLER! He is the worst, worst, worst!!! Stalin was terrible, but Clinton and Bush are nowhere near that level of pure evil, even if you do not approve of their policies.

But seriously, how could anyone have a question about who is worst??? Hitler killed MILLIONS of people! Had concentration camps... come on, people.

2006-08-18 06:45:58 · answer #4 · answered by Leah 6 · 2 0

You liberals do a similar ingredient. maximum liberals on right here look after Obama in basic terms like the NeoCons look after Bush. the actuality which you men can no longer make certain they are the two controlled via a similar wealthy human beings proves all of you're uneducated. in case you do no longer blame the Democrats AND Republicans who bypass regulations like NADD How which you may desire to get your head out of our *** and releize the two events are corrupt. via the way i'm a libertarian who hates and blames ninety 5% of our government.

2016-09-29 10:09:25 · answer #5 · answered by wardwell 4 · 0 0

Gotta take Stalin. Communism is responsible for more death and suffering than all other regimes combined.

2006-08-18 06:43:27 · answer #6 · answered by dizneeland 3 · 1 0

Hitler ordered the extermination of six million innocent people. I think it's obvious who is the worst person.

2006-08-18 06:42:17 · answer #7 · answered by silent fiesta 2 · 1 1

stalin

2006-08-18 06:41:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Bush because he should have learned from the others but he did not .

2006-08-18 06:54:02 · answer #9 · answered by incredible22 3 · 1 1

All but Clinton are worse.

2006-08-18 06:43:27 · answer #10 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers