English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bill Clinton bombed more countries than any peacetime president. He bombed Yugoslavia without the UN's approval, he also bombed Sudan, wiping out a medicine factory, he bombed Iraq almost daily, Somalia, and Afghanistan. Why was it ok for Clinton but not for Bush especially after 9-11? now let's hear the stupid liberal answers!

2006-08-18 06:35:14 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

tyrone, he sure did, the day before his impeachment vote. but I'm sure he had a good reason!

2006-08-18 06:46:23 · update #1

7 answers

Correct. He also bombed Serbia, which was a soverign nation (like Iraq). He only bombed when he dropped in the polls. The Serbs were our allies in WWII and saved over 600 airmen, including 500 Americans. The Croats and Muslims were part of a Nazi puppet regime. Clinton bombed our old allies the Serbs, and protected our old enemies, the Croats.

2006-08-19 03:27:50 · answer #1 · answered by The Big Shot 6 · 0 0

Well, NATO bombed Yugoslavia. The bombings in the Sudan and Afganastan were aimed at Osama Bin Laden, and the conservatives in Congress put an end to that, funny how that looks now isn't it? The attacks in Iraq were aimed at anti-aircraft positions to enforce the UN santioned no-fly zone. The difference is that Bush, isn't going after the 9-11 conspiritors, he's going after something that remains a mystery to the people of the world, not just the US.

2006-08-18 13:49:17 · answer #2 · answered by vertical732 4 · 3 0

Because Clinton had no value system at all except his own needs and wants and liberals respond to that. So, everthing he did is ok but they hate a president with some standards. How dare he say there is a right and wrong.

2006-08-18 14:12:23 · answer #3 · answered by ND Girl 2 · 0 0

Vertical with the smackdown! Since you wanted to hear a stupid liberal answer, you probably won't give vertical best answer...But that answer is best...

2006-08-18 14:03:30 · answer #4 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0 0

I'm sure that the liberals think he was okay to do that. They also thought it was okay for him to get a ******** while he was at work - so much for saving the free world.

2006-08-18 13:42:54 · answer #5 · answered by skippy 3 · 0 2

He didn't invade Iraq.

2006-08-18 13:42:31 · answer #6 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 0 0

No, it wasn't.

2006-08-18 14:25:04 · answer #7 · answered by RATM 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers