English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 9 July 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

2006-07-09 09:21:37 · 9 answers · asked by darryldarryldarryldarryl 1

2006-07-09 09:17:28 · 3 answers · asked by darryldarryldarryldarryl 1

it seems like a channel for and funded by the gop.

2006-07-09 09:14:44 · 13 answers · asked by david c 4

as well as good economy, low gas prices, low interest rates, more financial aid, more jobs. with bush we have none of these things.

2006-07-09 09:13:08 · 14 answers · asked by david c 4

Why doesn't the international community rally together to make war, invasions, violent military aggressions, acts of violent aggression and terror one nation or group of people within a nation against another, a international criminal offence? With all the death, destruction, violent activities and poverty these international actions create why are these actions not taken as seriously, and considered to be the same as one individual murdering another individual within your own community, town, city, province, state and country? What is the difference? Especially when these international acts of violence leave so tremendously much death, destruction, corruption and poverty in their after math? Especially when the vast majority of these international conflicts are the direct result of some misguided and over zealous political figure going insane over little or no actual acceptable reason at all in hind sight? If Mr. Bush wants to use his military why not use it to enforce these laws?

2006-07-09 09:08:28 · 9 answers · asked by Dream Police 2

I like the United States to set up a Zoo for Liberals to be displayed in glass cages. This Cindy Sheeman Cow would make a good display as to the thinking coming from liberal activists. She should be categorized in the Hall of Shame, what do you think.

2006-07-09 09:06:59 · 5 answers · asked by debater 1

Since FOX News is clearly conserviative (they don't even try to hide it) and CNN, CBS, ABC, & NBC are liberal, where can I go to get truly objective news coverage?

2006-07-09 09:06:56 · 13 answers · asked by arvis3 4

how can you support a president who continues to cater to corporations. all these items were cheaper under clinton.

2006-07-09 08:57:24 · 12 answers · asked by david c 4

We have had gas prices RISE since we went to Iraq. Can't people just admit that the war is not for oil? That we went their to find weapons of mass destruction and found them along with MASS GRAVES. And why do people keep saying that we didn't? We didn't find the type of weapons we thought they had, they had different ones still capable of killing us!!!

2006-07-09 08:50:22 · 17 answers · asked by Tanja J 1

But i want facts, and not that he's a born again christian

please no negative about the man. thank you

2006-07-09 08:45:03 · 40 answers · asked by Love420 2

Since the overwhelming answer is yes, should it be enforced or regulated.

2006-07-09 08:44:27 · 7 answers · asked by Rocketman 2

example- bankruptcy act, tax cuts, credit rates, interest rates, gas prices

2006-07-09 08:15:03 · 12 answers · asked by david c 4

rupert murdoch a billion dollar conservative hired roger ailes a right wing propogandist to run fox news. ailes was responsible for making campaign ads for regan. and also was the first producer for the rush limbaugh radio show. murdoch and ailes are also self described clinton haters. fair and balanced?

2006-07-09 08:10:15 · 13 answers · asked by david c 4

how many of the democrats on here, know why the troops are in iraq??? if you think you do, please tell why and if you support it or not.

2006-07-09 08:09:30 · 15 answers · asked by iwannajess 2

2006-07-09 08:05:34 · 19 answers · asked by Rocketman 2

2006-07-09 08:00:13 · 31 answers · asked by flmedic2002 2

clinton increased it, bush is cutting it. shameful.

2006-07-09 07:56:02 · 19 answers · asked by david c 4

I remember reading that Jesus told the Religous right that they had ears to hear but could not hear.

I'm thinking this hasen't changed.

2006-07-09 07:20:46 · 13 answers · asked by Rocketman 2

2006-07-09 07:20:12 · 13 answers · asked by david a 1

as i sit here watching the world cup final i cant help but think that soccer is the greatest game on earth

2006-07-09 07:19:04 · 13 answers · asked by pat o 2

Why is it the French can have national pride, the Polish, English German, Italians, Brazilians, Argentines and Aussies, Russians, Japanese etc can too...but when Americans have pride you all call us arrogant?
Please no bashing I know our "team" sucked, I truly want to understand the difference.

2006-07-09 06:59:54 · 3 answers · asked by mymadsky 6

2006-07-09 06:53:37 · 36 answers · asked by Joel M 2

I believe Rudolph Guliani showed great leadership and made several good decisions in New York after 9/11. He kept his cool and i think he would make a great president. I believe Hilary Clinton is the top candidate to run against him. Who would you vote for if this was "the match-up"?

2006-07-09 06:50:12 · 18 answers · asked by drQuiggles 2

2006-07-09 06:49:14 · 8 answers · asked by prettylittlepowderkeg 3

Preface: I am not a religious fanatic (Agnostic), just pro-life. I made this decision based on LOGIC. Anyhow, this is your chance pro-choicers to frame your arguement on this topic. PLEASE NOTE I DID NOT USE THE WORD KILL, YOU MUST EXPLAIN HOW IT IS NOT *TAKING* A HUMAN LIFE (SEE BELOW)!! Please do not insult me with the "it's my choice" arguement with no supporting arguement. You will be labeled an mindless parrot with no ability to critically analyze.***I had to repost this question because people don't read for comprehension. This question is saying: How is it logically or morally justifiable to take a human life via Abortion. I do NOT want to hear this nonsense about when life begins. I am saying that you must explain how it is justifiable because if you had not interfered in the life cycle of pregnancy, an additional life would be on this Earth.

2006-07-09 06:48:05 · 20 answers · asked by Nicholi 1

Why shoud North Korea and Iran be labeled as evil for wanting to possess nuclear weapons but not the United States, Isreal, or even China and Russia? I believe what is good for the goose should be good for the gardner.

2006-07-09 06:47:33 · 15 answers · asked by Karwolo 2

mexicans (who are from spain) talk of returning the US west to mexico, but yet they don't like mexico enough to live there. native americans yak about it all the time but yet they embrace every form of modern convience that the eurpeons brought over, so....why all this garbage talk? do you all truly think you will be better off separated from the US?

2006-07-09 06:46:46 · 7 answers · asked by mricon 2

2006-07-09 06:45:36 · 12 answers · asked by NICOLA K 1

The non believers will have to eat thier word once we win this war in Iraq and eliminate terror.

2006-07-09 06:41:43 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers