I believe Rudolph Guliani showed great leadership and made several good decisions in New York after 9/11. He kept his cool and i think he would make a great president. I believe Hilary Clinton is the top candidate to run against him. Who would you vote for if this was "the match-up"?
2006-07-09 06:50:12 · 18 answers · asked by drQuiggles 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If you think Guliani made good decisions post 9/11 you should be seriously taken away for examination. This is a man who is a prosecutor but failed to keep the evidence of the twin towers for future examination. He is part of the 9/11 lie and it will come back to haunt him. Do you know he now makes his money from security advice? what a joke. America WAKE UP.
2006-07-09 07:00:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I wouldn't vote for either. Guliani was involved in the cover-up of 9-11. Hiliary is in the same boat as any of this other greedy, self interested politicians WAKE UP
2006-07-09 08:27:09 · answer #2 · answered by brian f 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the perfect individual for the interest is fairly what we'd want to continually be searching for. Having a "woman" President shouldn't even enter into the equation. someone with strong moral fiber, a intense aspect of intelligence, strong judgment, someone who's a strong choose of personality. someone who will encompass themselves with the perfect and the brightest advisers. regrettably, Mrs. Clinton chosen an inclination philanderer for a husband and that left the mum and dad of usa of america having to describe to their very youthful impressionable children why the problem of sexual sex contained in the White living house became on the 6:00 information each and every evening. you're patently no longer fairly searching for a extreme answer or you'll not have made the truth on the topic of what "each and every guy needs." JFK became likely as a lot or extra of a playboy. we are able to likely by no potential understand. the vast large difference is he became the President of usa of america at a time even as journalism did not attain down into the gutter to rfile the information. bill Clinton knew he became living in a distinct time and playing by employing an complete distinct algorithm. after all, he became our President, he must have chosen a extra perfect course! to placed the cherry on accurate of his undesirable judgement, he had the audacity to lie about his movements! Please! the guy isn't dumb and he knew what he became being requested with regard to "sexual kinfolk." I say, stay away! Write your books and assemble you funds from conversing engagements. do not carry our us of a decrease back to ethical lowground by employing shifting decrease back into the White living house!
2016-11-06 02:30:51 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While there are other Republicans I would like to see in The White House instead of Guiliani (being he is Pro-Abortion and favors Gun Control), he has shown he can lead and I certainly would choose him over Hillary any day.
2006-07-09 06:59:24 · answer #4 · answered by MrCool1978 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton only because Bill Clinton got something called peace to come around.
2006-07-09 06:54:20 · answer #5 · answered by jajais4u 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rudolph W. Giuliani would make an excellent president.
2006-07-09 07:05:56 · answer #6 · answered by psych0bug 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Guliani is a poser..
I'd vote Hilary..
2006-07-09 07:11:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Guliani would be ok by me. I really like the name 'hildabeast'. She'll be flying 'broomstick one'.
2006-07-09 07:20:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hilary!
2006-07-09 06:53:43 · answer #9 · answered by Tones 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither!!!!! Tom Tancredo for President!
2006-07-09 06:52:29 · answer #10 · answered by Sashie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋