Politics - 4 July 2006

2006-07-04 05:47:29 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hitler's father's mother got pregnant while working as a servant in a Jewish houshold, and she would never tell of the identity of the "father", presumably because of the interracial.
So the papers of Bloodline which all Germans were required to produce on pain of Death: Adolf Hitler could not produce himself!

2006-07-04 05:42:19 · 8 answers · asked by wise.to.Jew! 1

2006-07-04 05:35:56 · 31 answers · asked by cave man 6

They seem to STILL think that Iraq attacked us on 9/11..
How can you possibly still believe this???

2006-07-04 05:27:01 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

i'm working on a theory here........

BTW, I'm VERY liberal, and I donated to ONE 4 months ago.

2006-07-04 05:25:32 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-04 05:23:34 · 14 answers · asked by Commensalism 2

I've read ALL of the books Coulter, Hannity, O'Reilly and Savage have written.
You see, unlike you, us liberals like to be informed from BOTH sides. So if you haven't read liberal books, then you're only getting half the story. So you can't make an informed opinion. Is this making any sense?

2006-07-04 05:08:17 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I know we're fighting them there so we don't have to fight them here, but is it ok to bring them all to Iraq and fight them on neutral grounds? Just seems that we brought the war to Iraq, and the Iraqi civilians are sufforing the most.

Should India and Pakistan bring their military's to the U.S. and go at it in Washington? Does that seem ok too?

2006-07-04 05:08:12 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why? Would he be good at it? Would you like to work with him? If so, why? What do you think you could gain from your association with him? Could you trust him to work independently? How do you think he would get along with his coworkers? Would he be married or perhaps even in a gay relationship? Would Dick Cheney figure in some how?

2006-07-04 05:01:27 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-04 04:56:15 · 8 answers · asked by What? 1

Agree or disagree, our stance on Iran enrichment program is going to have a reverse effect in the long run. By insisting that there purposes for there enrichment program, isnt what they really tend to do with it. We are opening the door to new terrorist, whos going to feel that we are keeping there country in the dumps, so to speak, and inact terroeist activities within this country, although were not the only country in on it, but were going to be the ones to blame. Also it may be possible that they really want a new pwer source as they said, to make up for the ones we promised them, which was what some theororize was the reason for terrorist problems in the last decade or so, so I feel we should do all what we can to help them, so that we can show the upincomer terrorist were not all that bad, the oliver branch of peace. This way we can mointor them, and prevent future problems.

The golden rule applies to the ?, if u cant answer the ?, dont, if u hve a com. on my spell, dont answ.

2006-07-04 04:54:51 · 7 answers · asked by Derrick 3

SS Gaurds at the white house have been quoted as reporting this problem during the eighties and now they're forbidden to discuss this topic.

2006-07-04 04:50:38 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Also, Karl Rove is to be sent to Iraq, and Al Gore is to enter office right away. After all, he actually did win the presidency in 2000, and we owe him that much.

2006-07-04 04:44:33 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

Because that isn't what he said. That would've been a lie. What he said was that when he was in the senate, he took the initiative to HELP invent the internet. That was the truth. See, Gore, and Gore alone, made it his #1 priority to push for the funding that made possible the internet we know today. Without that government funding, the whole damn thing would probably have been set back 20 years.
So Gore was telling the truth. And Karl Rove (aka the REAL president) and the conservatives were liars.
Big surprise, huh?

2006-07-04 04:41:14 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-04 04:31:20 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-04 04:30:55 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-04 04:30:46 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

I officially announce my candidacy for President. Here are me solutions to important issue:

Social Security- leave it alone....there is nothing wrong with it

The war in Iraq- we are getting the hell out of there, immediately.

Gay marriage- government has NO business in your personal life. legalize it

Gay adoption-ditto

Abortion- will remain legal....with MANY more restrictions. it is just way too damn easy to get one.

Prayer in schools- shockingly enough, I'm all for it. on your own time, in a designated place, and only if a teacher or school official volunteers to lead the group. taxpayers shouldn't have to pay for it. and this goes for ALL religions.

Taxes-You make more, you pay more. Wealthy people don't pay enough.

Immigration-It shouldn't be so hard for people to become American citizens. You make it easier, people stop jumping the border, and the cost goes down

VOTE KUBRICKIAN IN '08. now its on to Chicago, and let's win there.

2006-07-04 04:25:04 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-04 03:45:17 · 26 answers · asked by ridcully69 3

2006-07-04 03:44:04 · 15 answers · asked by ridcully69 3

2006-07-04 03:40:36 · 13 answers · asked by renaud 4

2006-07-04 03:31:40 · 13 answers · asked by chiciti 1

2006-07-04 03:27:38 · 9 answers · asked by In This Last Hour 2

We have seen what happens when the wrong person is put in the White House. What will YOU do differently this next election to ensure that we don't get another joke in the White House?

2006-07-04 03:24:48 · 13 answers · asked by MadforMAC 7

2006-07-04 03:15:04 · 5 answers · asked by Muskrat21 1

I hate George Bush, also I hate osama bin Laden. in my opinion George Bush in the main terrorist in this world. is this means I'm terrorist? I asked myself this question, is it possible I'm terrorist or george Bush and his student Osma bin laden are the terrorists. what is terrorism? I got confused.
sometimes I ask myself if george Bush is not terrorist why he invaded Iraq and why unfairly he supports Israel against palestine? the answer from western media is to save Iraq from sadam and to save israel from bad arab countries but this sound wrong for me for many reasons, first America supported saddam when he followed american orders to fight against Iran and when he stoped this war his duty as american agent is finished, something else all arab leaders are worst than sadam and supported by america until now because they still say yes to american orders, this means the talk that america went Iraq to protect it from sadam is wrong....I got crazy who is terrorist me or Bush?

2006-07-04 03:09:39 · 15 answers · asked by Number-1 2

i am curious is modern day liberals like kennedy, Reid and Pelosi would respond to the events on Dec 7th, 1941 at Pearl Harbor? Would they have handled it the same? Im sure they argued the same thing that Japan will never be a democratic govt( Iraq?)...But look at japan now. A very strong allie and just 60 years ago we killed how many hundreds of thousands? So what would modern day libs do? I think they would surrender myself.

2006-07-04 02:54:49 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-04 02:42:58 · 21 answers · asked by ilikethickchix 5

Considering that you hate America and you would rather we live under the uspices of the honorable UN (LOL, can't even type that with a straight face), what independece are you celebrating?

Read this article (your idiology is a farce):http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichaelMedved/2006/07/04/todays_anti-american_leftists_betray_their_own_radical_heritage

2006-07-04 02:28:50 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-04 02:27:16 · 16 answers · asked by bobbydennis352005 2