Agree or disagree, our stance on Iran enrichment program is going to have a reverse effect in the long run. By insisting that there purposes for there enrichment program, isnt what they really tend to do with it. We are opening the door to new terrorist, whos going to feel that we are keeping there country in the dumps, so to speak, and inact terroeist activities within this country, although were not the only country in on it, but were going to be the ones to blame. Also it may be possible that they really want a new pwer source as they said, to make up for the ones we promised them, which was what some theororize was the reason for terrorist problems in the last decade or so, so I feel we should do all what we can to help them, so that we can show the upincomer terrorist were not all that bad, the oliver branch of peace. This way we can mointor them, and prevent future problems.
The golden rule applies to the ?, if u cant answer the ?, dont, if u hve a com. on my spell, dont answ.
2006-07-04
04:54:51
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Derrick
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
thats why i think we should do it for them. Also we need to break our behavior so that we can establish peace, in the middle east, if we keep doing as we been doing, I quruntee there is going to be another war in the mid. east within the next two decades, but if we break our behavior were breaking a chain that all of reality is twisted up in
2006-07-04
05:08:26 ·
update #1
You know what Geogre Washington sid, je siad "the only way to establish peace, is to be ready for war", so even if they tend to make a weapon, we have more, and I think if every country had just one, this world would be a very peaceful place, cus' we will all be scared into it, scared str8.
2006-07-04
05:13:49 ·
update #2