Politics - 2 July 2006

i say Clinton, and Ronald Reagon? how about u

2006-07-02 07:30:39 · 39 answers · asked by Anonymous

Reagan was given credit for swinging a lot of voters to the other side. Many of those same voters voted for Clinton. They seemed to be divided in 2000 and 2004.

I saw an email on tv (from a viewer) from a Reagan Democrat who said he doesn't expect to vote for a Republican for a long time.

How do you think these vital swing voters will vote in 2006 and 2008?

NOTE: Serious answers only. Anyone tossing out insults as answers will be reported.

2006-07-02 07:26:03 · 4 answers · asked by WBrian_28 5

what are those congressmen and senators doing .the lake houses and boats are dusted off by mexicans the jet skies loaded behind the family suv and the two hour trip to the country begins saturday ending with fireworks and the drive home that night or early the next morning.HOW much will they think about our boys in un-iform and should we not tone down celebrations during times of war.
INSTEAD millions of defense contractors have closed till wednesday the well paid and well benefited health care and retirement secure and average americans will struggle to have a few freinds over and some low cost barbaque.
HOW DO THOSE CONSERVATIVES DO IT .
CELEBRATE LIKE NOTHING IS WRONG AND THE WORLD IS JUST FINE .
Enjoy these 4 days and remember americans are watching you .that is real americans

2006-07-02 07:22:48 · 13 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

2006-07-02 07:16:44 · 16 answers · asked by Eric C. 1

2006-07-02 06:45:03 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-02 06:43:45 · 14 answers · asked by Humdy 1

If u watch political polls the majority of americans are liberals, and the minorities are the natzi conservatives. They should all pack up and leave are wonderful country, they should move to the middle east since they are so much like the arabs (Controll And Decieve through religion) Come on America lets put them on ships and send these mentally disturbed devil created demons out of our lives.

2006-07-02 06:36:12 · 18 answers · asked by JOHN T 1

Don't say none.

2006-07-02 06:20:23 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-02 06:14:09 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Actually Jan. 2009. What do you think?

2006-07-02 05:45:07 · 21 answers · asked by Dr.Feelgood 5

2006-07-02 05:39:45 · 10 answers · asked by rick53730 1

At the New Jersey state assembly. Liberals, being the self-proclaimed onmipotent intellects and savants shut down non-essential state operations. Why? Because they can't come up with a budget that includes enough tax INCREASES to close a 1.5 billion gap. Of course, in their superior mental powers, it is impossible for liberals to attempt to CUT spending like all American families do when faced with an imbalance.

God forbid you cut the abortion budget, or the prisoner sex change budget, or the free college education for illegals and life-time convicts, or the pork projects that benefit only their cronies. NOOOOOOO, that would not be "progressive" and "compassionate". That's what the tax payer is for, when the budget goes to the red ink, F the tax payer and increase taxes.

2006-07-02 05:38:27 · 15 answers · asked by scorpion 1

that 9/11 was a cover-up and that 9/11 was an inside job. The facts or at leats one fact to support this is that WTC building's 1,2 and 7's collapses were the first three in history prior to 9/11 and since to ever have collapsed due to fires or at least that's what we were all told. Well you figure the Towers were both 110 stories tall and they collapsed in less than 10 seconds so that means that they fell at nearly the speed of gravity/

2006-07-02 05:21:11 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-02 04:45:34 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-02 04:40:42 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

we all know and agree that bush and the bin laden family are bussiness partners.that they we'rnt and will not even begin to look for him.

2006-07-02 04:40:41 · 36 answers · asked by Bruce F 1

2006-07-02 04:30:32 · 3 answers · asked by mus s 1

"A government of reason is better than one of force." --Thomas Jefferson to Richard Rush, 1820. ME 15:284

"I am not myself apt to be alarmed at innovations recommended by reason. That dread belongs to those whose interests or prejudices shrink from the advance of truth and science." --Thomas Jefferson to John Manners, 1814. ME 14:103

"What an effort... of bigotry in politics and religion have we gone through! The barbarians really flattered themselves they should be able to bring back the times of Vandalism, when ignorance put everything into the hands of power and priestcraft. All advances in science were proscribed as innovations. They pretended to praise and encourage education, but it was to be the education of our ancestors. We were to look backwards, not forwards, for improvement." --Thomas Jefferson to Joseph Priestley, 1801. ME 10:228

"Ignorance and bigotry, like other insanities, are incapable of self-government." --Thomas Jefferson to Lafayette, 1817. ME 15:116

2006-07-02 04:28:13 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

about 200 pepole of passenger killed and the USA gaverment told it was be a mistake.What is your idea?Realy was it a mistake?

2006-07-02 04:15:26 · 13 answers · asked by tipool 1

2006-07-02 04:13:47 · 28 answers · asked by Neill 1

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/history/husseinindex.htm

2006-07-02 03:38:47 · 6 answers · asked by Hoolahoop 3

2006-07-02 03:36:12 · 23 answers · asked by gdjgff g 1

2006-07-02 03:30:32 · 16 answers · asked by Ice 6

2006-07-02 03:23:01 · 4 answers · asked by chet 1

2006-07-02 03:21:50 · 19 answers · asked by anna p 1

George W. Bush plumbed the deepest place in himself, looking for a simple expression of what the assaults of September 11 required. It was his role to lead the nation, and the very world. The President, at a moment of crisis, defines the communal response. A few days after the assault, George W. Bush did this. Speaking spontaneously, without the aid of advisers or speechwriters, he put a word on the new American purpose that both shaped it and gave it meaning. "This crusade," he said, "this war on terrorism."





Crusade. I remember a momentary feeling of vertigo at the President's use of that word, the outrageous ineptitude of it. The vertigo lifted, and what I felt then was fear, sensing not ineptitude but exactitude. My thoughts went to the elusive Osama bin Laden, how pleased he must have been, Bush already reading from his script. I am a Roman Catholic with a feeling for history, and strong regrets, therefore, over what went wrong in my own tradition once the Crusades were launched. Contrary to schoolboy romances, Hollywood fantasies and the nostalgia of royalty, the Crusades were a set of world-historic crimes. I hear the word with a third ear, alert to its dangers, and I see through its legends to its warnings. For example, in Iraq "insurgents" have lately shocked the world by decapitating hostages, turning the most taboo of acts into a military tactic. But a thousand years ago, Latin crusaders used the severed heads of Muslim fighters as missiles, catapulting them over the fortified walls of cities under siege. Taboos fall in total war, whether crusade or jihad.

For George W. Bush, crusade was an offhand reference. But all the more powerfully for that, it was an accidental probing of unintended but nevertheless real meaning. That the President used the word inadvertently suggests how it expressed his exact truth, an unmasking of his most deeply felt purpose. Crusade, he said. Later, his embarrassed aides suggested that he had meant to use the word only as a synonym for struggle, but Bush's own syntax belied that. He defined crusade as war. Even offhandedly, he had said exactly what he meant.

2006-07-02 02:58:21 · 3 answers · asked by Hoolahoop 3

2006-07-02 02:47:47 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think he will pretend that that is the first time in his life to have seen a monkey

2006-07-02 02:25:13 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Answers other than "Grasshoppers and wasps smeared over the earth sucking the nectar." please

2006-07-02 02:18:28 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

most poeple say that Binladin is in pakistan/Afghan borders but a survey was done in Dubai and half of the people said that he is sitting in USA and enjoying....... let me ask you guys... WHERE IS BIN LADIN?

2006-07-02 02:00:56 · 55 answers · asked by Born_yesterday 3