English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 22 June 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

AT WHAT POINT WILL THE NEOCONS BE SATISFIED?

2006-06-22 14:21:53 · 13 answers · asked by INBRED TOOTHLESS NEOCONS 1

How does a company make such a huge profit on something that we are told we don't have?

2006-06-22 14:18:42 · 9 answers · asked by -Tequila17 6

So now what will you complain about?

2006-06-22 14:12:59 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

ARE WE NOT ALLOWED TO DISAGREE IN THIS COUNTRY?

2006-06-22 14:05:12 · 13 answers · asked by INBRED TOOTHLESS NEOCONS 1

2006-06-22 13:57:31 · 7 answers · asked by christine2550@sbcglobal.net 2

We all know how much you liberals love polls. I personally think they are biased, but since you guys don't, I'll leave the results for you.

"the NewsMax poll – which drew more than 90,000 respondents from sites across the Web, such as Drudge Report and the New York Times"

1) Was Ann Coulter wrong in criticizing four 9/11 widows known as the "Jersey Girls”?

Wrong: 15%

Not wrong: 85%

2) What is your opinion of Ann Coulter?

Favorable: 87%

Unfavorable: 13%

3) Do you agree with Hillary Clinton that Ann’s book is "vicious” and "heartless”?

Yes, agree: 13%

No, don’t agree: 87%

4) Has the media coverage of Ann Coulter and her book been fair?

Fair: 18%

Not fair: 82%

5) Of the three, who would you trust for news and information?

Katie Couric: 10%

Ann Coulter: 86%

Al Franken: 4%

2006-06-22 13:54:13 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

I really would also like to know just how many Clinton 'associates' were murdered or died under 'mysterious' circumstances.
I seem to recall that Rush Limbaugh had a list that was over a 100 names long.

2006-06-22 13:50:37 · 11 answers · asked by athorgarak 4

Saudi Arabia is controlled by totalitarian King Abdullah, who forbids any political parties, and only last year allowed free elections of some regional officials. Saudi Arabia deems denouncing Islam and homosexual acts as offences punishable by death. Most people, both men and women, are executed by beheading, which usually occurs in public. Amputation and flogging are common punishments practiced by the government. In 1997, someone was executed after being accused of practicing witchcraft by his employer. Saudi Arabia also forbids criticism of government policies as "un-Islamic", and these actions are punished also. Women are also kept in segregated facilities, and are forbidden from doing activites such as driving. Saudi Arabia also helps support terrorists. Between 1998 and 2003, 4 billion dollars was given to Palestinian terrorists who murder Israeli children. Through much of the 80s, the Saudi government also financed Arab terrorists who left for Afghanistan.

2006-06-22 13:40:44 · 8 answers · asked by Peter 1

This should be easy.

2006-06-22 13:35:50 · 30 answers · asked by Billy M 4

2006-06-22 13:21:12 · 22 answers · asked by me 5

In those days they didn't
1. Think gays were all it
2. Support illegal immagration
3. Think abortion was a great solution to reduce the minority population
4. Hate White people
5. Hate Christians
6. Love the poeple who attack and kill Americans
7. Beilieve all criminals were just misunderstood
8. Wish for America to lose a war
9. Fall head over heels for an idea like "Political Correctness"
10. Wish to be a slave of Islam

2006-06-22 13:17:38 · 7 answers · asked by Nick N 1

It's not difficult at all to understand. For example, here's the Second Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The only thing it says about religion is that the government is not allowed to create a state sponsored religion. It implies absolutely nothing about young women using their time to give a graduation speech and thanking Jesus as a violation.

It's the government that's restricted by the Amendment, not the people. This is the BILL OF RIGHTS not the "Bill Of What The Government Can Stop You From Doing".

If it wasn't so scary how ignorant liberals are it would be hilarious.

2006-06-22 12:29:29 · 25 answers · asked by David Styvaert 4

Brittany McComb, valedictorian of Foothill High School in Las Vegas had her speech cut short because she dared to try and use a reference to Jesus. The horror! Never mind that the Constitution doesn't require a separation of church and state, especially in the case of a young woman using her Constitutional freedom of speech to thank her Lord, the clergy in the Church of Liberalism saw fit to shut off her microphone and not allow her to finish her speech.

Is it so important that we not offend people just by uttering the name Jesus, while we allow celebrations of Kwanzaa and pacify radical Islam in our own country, that this young woman should have her Constitutional rights stepped on by the state?

I understand that all the libs will say yes, but I had to ask anyway. It's always interesting to read their interpretation of the Constitution.


http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/Jun-17-Sat-2006/news/8014416.html

2006-06-22 12:10:43 · 16 answers · asked by David Styvaert 4

2006-06-22 12:04:32 · 20 answers · asked by PARKERD 7

No liberal cause is defended with more dishonesty than abortion. No matter what else they pretend to care about from time to time — undermining national security, aiding terrorists, oppressing the middle class, freeing violent criminals — the single most important item on the Democrats' agenda is abortion. Indeed, abortion is the one issue the Democratic Party is willing to go to war over — except in the Muslim world, which is jam-packed with prohibitions on abortion, but going to war against a Muslim nation might also serve America's national security objectives. Liberals don't care about women. They care about destroying human life. To them, 2,200 military deaths in the entire course of a war in Iraq is unconscionable, but 1.3 million aborted babies in America every year is something to celebrate.

(note: this wasn't written by me but by some other person with superior intelligence)

2006-06-22 11:57:26 · 19 answers · asked by David Styvaert 4

I think that it should be mandatory in the U.S. to carry a gun when you turn 18 years old. It's a fact that the countries with the highest guns per citizen have the lowest crime rates. I don't think anyone would commit crimes if they knew the person had a gun on them. All these stupid Liberals want to take away our guns cause they hate America and want to leave us open for attacks! They love the high crime rate!! Who's with me?

2006-06-22 11:52:35 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

He started a war

2006-06-22 11:52:19 · 11 answers · asked by jaden 1

this is called the worst genocide of the 21st century....muslims slaughtering christians....so why isn't the mighty American police there?

2006-06-22 11:48:24 · 13 answers · asked by Pie's_Guy 6

I mean, given the abysmal failures of the Bush Administration and this Republican controlled House and Senate, rubber stamping Bush's war-mongering, his unabashed cronyism, deficit spiraling out of control ... does anybody notice? ... Does anybody care?

2006-06-22 11:37:29 · 11 answers · asked by Babs 7

if re pugs...want to be opposite of democrats..isn't it nice to know were open minded..and they are self centered...narrow minded?...by the way..meaning of liberal as follows,
LIBERAL, GENEROUS, BOUNTIFUL, MUNIFICENT mean giving or given freely and unstintingly. LIBERAL suggests openhandedness in the giver and largeness in the thing or amount given . GENEROUS stresses warmhearted readiness to give more than size or importance of the gift . BOUNTIFUL suggests lavish, unremitting giving or providing . MUNIFICENT suggests a scale of giving appropriate to lords or princes .

2006-06-22 11:32:05 · 15 answers · asked by tigers fan 2

2006-06-22 11:25:31 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

If, tommorow, there would be a new find of a bunch of fully functioning WMD's made in the past couple of years, what would your reaction be?

2006-06-22 11:23:36 · 18 answers · asked by Anon28 4

Why are we over there? What besides oil makes this our war. When did we become the world police. What else could we be spending our money on? Maybe Nation-wide health care, better drug programs. How come in the duration of this war our freedom of speech is threatened? All done under the guise of moral majority and doing the right thing? Isn't that how Hitler started his regime

2006-06-22 11:18:20 · 7 answers · asked by Kimberly H 1

2006-06-22 11:14:12 · 4 answers · asked by Giggly Giraffe 7

What is your reaction to the recently declassified National Ground Intelligence Center report that more than 500 chemical weapons (WMD's) have been found in Iraq?

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf

2006-06-22 11:08:07 · 13 answers · asked by Anon28 4

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1797771,00.html?gusrc=rss.

2006-06-22 10:57:51 · 10 answers · asked by RichardR 1

The avian flu strain H5N1 was first isolated in human beings nine years ago in Hong Kong, and since that time, barely 100 people have died in the whole world. However, the world was alerted to the efficacy of the human antiviral Tamiflu as a preventative. Somebody is and will be making millions of dollars from the manufacturing of this drug which may not even necessarily be effective. http://www.mercola.com/2005/oct/25/rumsfeld_to_profit_from_avian_flu_hoax.htm and http://money.cnn.com/2005/10/31/news/newsmakers/fortune_rumsfeld/ So, how do you feel about this?

2006-06-22 10:50:50 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers