Politics - 22 June 2006

if 50 000 civilians are killed in this war estmated 2/3 should be women and children. Not insurgents not terrorists. Republicans it is time to face reality. It is not a game anymore.

2006-06-22 23:40:49 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-22 23:31:56 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think it could be quite dangerous. It will also destroy India's secular status. Should India be Hindu nation? What are your views on it, and parties/organizations like Shiv sena and the RSS?

2006-06-22 23:17:08 · 2 answers · asked by avik_d2000 4

if stayed on power would Saddam kill that many?

2006-06-22 23:11:43 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-22 22:28:17 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-22 22:22:18 · 11 answers · asked by Auzen 2

I hope that no one who reads this question actually dies tomorrow =(

2006-06-22 22:14:53 · 41 answers · asked by Oh, Natey-O! 3

Heard this suggestion somewhere, can't remember where. Got me thinking - what would the world be like if it was run entirely by women for a few generations? Substantially different, I reckon.

2006-06-22 21:42:36 · 14 answers · asked by wild_eep 6

Look at how many people live today in many part of this world, generations born and die in wars, and never see a peace. They born in war live so long in wars and die as the war still goes on. Many others thrive, live happy and in peace, yet they always complain about their governments, why can't you be thankful that you sleep in peace and wake up in peace and make to work without a shot been fired at you. Think... think people. I am asking this, because I myself lived in war ever since I can remember.

2006-06-22 21:39:57 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-22 21:39:35 · 12 answers · asked by Shahbaz A 1

What are the first things you would do!

2006-06-22 20:44:22 · 17 answers · asked by Oh, Natey-O! 3

i'd like to understand your view on power as in i have power cuss i have money .

what is power to you

or

what do you see in this modern age as a means of power

2006-06-22 20:23:41 · 3 answers · asked by JOSE F 1

owned slaves prior to the Civil War.

2006-06-22 20:11:18 · 15 answers · asked by Leifr Eiríksson 2

2006-06-22 19:43:24 · 6 answers · asked by Giggly Giraffe 7

2006-06-22 19:05:38 · 10 answers · asked by cassicad75 3

The bill provides for granting illegals access to Social Security benefits while said illegals were working in the US illegally.
I do not think that these illegals who so respected our border will universally respect this bills intent. I think these illegals will defraud the US Taxpayer by claiming additional money earned, while they were here undocumented and illegally.

Oh and historical note, California belonged to Mexico for 22 years before the people of California revolted against the Mexican Governor and soon thereafter joined the United States.

Califonia has been in the union since 1846 and still retains the right to seperate from the union as does Texas, and several other states.

2006-06-22 18:28:29 · 8 answers · asked by sscam2001 3

I know that for this American, I don't trust any of the candidates considering running. Senator Kerry has talked about it, and not to long ago, here in Texas he told the citizens he did not care if they did not want another tax hike, they had no choice.
The only people our government needs to take this attitude with are threatening nations. Not the American People. Kerry, and Bush come from the same platform. I as an American am tired of being punished by having my civil rights violated because my home was attacked on 9/11. I don't want another president like this one, and honestly, I no longer want the government I have.I want a real candidate for the people. One that is not afraid to put thier background out there, and provide drug test results, just like the American people are forced to do when they apply for a job., and if they don't want to do that, then get those laws off the books, or a No Vote is all you'll get from me, your not qualified for the job. Just as it is 4 me

2006-06-22 18:25:18 · 10 answers · asked by Spirited1 2

2006-06-22 18:21:51 · 9 answers · asked by Lost. at. Sea. 7

2006-06-22 18:12:28 · 9 answers · asked by Leifr Eiríksson 2

dems are calling for a pull out...the media criticizes everything america does...liberal celebraties speak out agains the war...we are in the war...get over it...why do you support the troops...don't tell me you do you when bad mouth what they are in...to me these liberals are like people when they have a family problem they tell everyone about it so the family changes to thier view...instead of keeping it internal then resolving the problem with in the family...not with the neighborhood...it is soo childish...

2006-06-22 18:09:00 · 15 answers · asked by turntable 6

Almost every American that I know of that is employed is working as many hours as they can get, and they are still falling deeper in debt, many of them have taken on second jobs. There is no one home to raise their children, because grandparent can't afford to retire and help their children raise their families, they have to pay the high medical costs acquired by aging. There children can not afford to take care of them because there is barely enough food on the table.for the kids. This is my description of the average family in America. If the family combined makes fifty thousand a year and has two children, they can not afford a descent car, or housing, much less care for elderly parents. Besides they won't be there to care for them, they will be at work supporting greedy industries, and a greedy government taxing them to death.

2006-06-22 18:08:40 · 4 answers · asked by Spirited1 2

Pro-life or Pro-death? You say you are pro-chocie. So you choose to let the genocide of babies go on in America. Over 1.2 million babies are slaughtered every year because of abortion. Thats about 1 every 20 seconds in the US alone.
Genocide is "The systematic and planned extermination..." Abortion is planned and very systematic. Over 48 MILLION babies have been murdered since Roe v. Wade was passed. And you call this chocie? Where is the voice for the babies that are being murdered by the millions?

2006-06-22 18:03:32 · 10 answers · asked by flyguy03 3

Antiwar people say that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, which is true according to what we know. But did President Bush ever say or imply Hussein had a connection to the attacks? Please list your sources.

2006-06-22 17:30:36 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

If global warming happens, according to evolution, won't we just adapt to our new enviroments. Remember that core value of Evolution...Survival of the Fittest. Just a thought =P

2006-06-22 17:30:11 · 12 answers · asked by frenchfry1805 1

Me and my son were eating dinner the other day and out of nowhere he asked me" Dad Why is the president always killing children and people"? I was floored that even a 6 year old that is not partisan came to that conclusion,. How DO I explain to my child why Bush is killing innocent people?

2006-06-22 17:12:57 · 31 answers · asked by ast5792 1

I would personally love to see Hilary Clinton or Colon Powell take the throne.

2006-06-22 17:04:41 · 25 answers · asked by Oracle 3

im kinda young, but i want to learn about politics, i want to know everything there is to know, so i will be able to at least carry on an intelligent conversation, so what are all these terms people are using? ie. cabinet, senate, liberal, republican, party, etc...

2006-06-22 17:03:28 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Anyone that screws 300million people has got to get something.

2006-06-22 16:58:47 · 21 answers · asked by -Tequila17 6

2006-06-22 16:52:24 · 36 answers · asked by ast5792 1

Seems logical since they always spout off about how Allah will help them to kill the infidels that if they end up getting their asses handed to them, as they have, it must mean that Allah actually finds them to be rather assclownish, just like the rest of the world does (except American liberals).

2006-06-22 16:48:26 · 8 answers · asked by David Styvaert 4