English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

25 answers

If Hillary Clinton were to become President, we would experience World War III.

2006-06-22 12:49:27 · answer #1 · answered by Repeat Offender 2 · 1 0

Al Gore

2006-06-22 12:50:17 · answer #2 · answered by Matthew C 1 · 0 0

Al Gore. Hillary Clinton is a lot more moderate than Al. Although she would make a terrible Pres, Al Gore would be a total screw up.

2006-06-22 12:49:53 · answer #3 · answered by jack f 7 · 0 0

i don't believe of so. Gore has little if any credibility. each body such because the elements Channel is suing this nut case for feeding the accepted public undesirable assistance about international warming. the commercial effect of his BS has fee the federal governments billion throughout the time of the last 10 years. Hillary "Rotten" is only a basic liar so who is going to help her. there is not any longer some thing credible about her. She in no way solutions direct questions. Many individuals are nonetheless no longer confident that she did no longer have some involvement contained in the Vince Foster "suicide". From all debts she is a terrible man or woman. allow her die on the convention. per chance the international will finally be rid of her and her scum bag husband.

2016-11-15 03:33:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Good question! They both scare me, but I honestly think Hillary Clinton has a slight advantage over Al Gore -- let's just hope we never have to find out the answer to your question first-hand!

2006-06-22 12:55:48 · answer #5 · answered by partlycloudy 4 · 0 0

I would have to say Al Gore- Hillary has someone that has already been in office on her side. I think that gives her a big advantage.

2006-06-22 12:50:46 · answer #6 · answered by selbbeps 2 · 0 0

George Bush

2006-06-22 12:51:52 · answer #7 · answered by Stephen C 1 · 0 0

Probably Hillary, if she were to run the country into the ground, but before her any kooky Republican who happens to get elected would do it in a quarter of the time, you see examples of Republican "leadership" today. Take it how you will. I just call em like I see em.

2006-06-22 12:57:35 · answer #8 · answered by JoeThatUKnow 3 · 0 0

This is a hard one. Communist vs. Extreme Environazi. Hmm...

I think Hillary would do more damage because we could bum rush Gore and kick his whiny butt. But that Hillary is one tough dude.

2006-06-22 12:51:00 · answer #9 · answered by Farly the Seer 5 · 0 0

With out a doubt the guy in the chair now is the worst president ever,in all american history.Dan Quale would be a vast improvement on this warmonger.Mind you any anyone could do a better job

2006-06-22 13:50:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers