We all know how much you liberals love polls. I personally think they are biased, but since you guys don't, I'll leave the results for you.
"the NewsMax poll – which drew more than 90,000 respondents from sites across the Web, such as Drudge Report and the New York Times"
1) Was Ann Coulter wrong in criticizing four 9/11 widows known as the "Jersey Girls”?
Wrong: 15%
Not wrong: 85%
2) What is your opinion of Ann Coulter?
Favorable: 87%
Unfavorable: 13%
3) Do you agree with Hillary Clinton that Ann’s book is "vicious” and "heartless”?
Yes, agree: 13%
No, don’t agree: 87%
4) Has the media coverage of Ann Coulter and her book been fair?
Fair: 18%
Not fair: 82%
5) Of the three, who would you trust for news and information?
Katie Couric: 10%
Ann Coulter: 86%
Al Franken: 4%
2006-06-22 13:54:13 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Maybe its because they polled 90 thousand, instead of 1000 people.
2006-06-22 14:00:27 · update #1
Obviously, this was a poll of people who like Ann Coulter. The poll results show that, do they not?
I don't think all polls are fair. I say Bush's approval ratings re fair because similar results are gotten from both FOX and CNN, in addition to tons of other polling sources.
2006-06-23 02:58:34 · answer #1 · answered by Mac Guru 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
1. Ann Coulter was right on the mark!
2. My Opinion of Ann Coulter is Highly Favorable
3. Hillary Clinton is a leftist communist!
4. The Media is unfair to anyone who speaks the truth!
5. Ann Coulter
2006-06-22 21:03:46 · answer #2 · answered by montanawarm 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if I am liberal but I am left of center. :)
Of course polls are biased. They are marketed to meet the agenda; whatever that agenda may be.
So what's the point of the posted results.
That poll was linked off MANY MANY sites, most of them ones that favor Ann Coulter.
With that said, it is highly likely that those that support her and her opinion took the poll.
I took the poll too. :) however I don't agree with radicals...ANY of them.
Another thing to add, anyone could have gone back and taken the poll two and three times.
The data is not scientific and again, it was not even a poll attempted to have some sort of neutrality.
2006-06-22 21:02:01 · answer #3 · answered by Pretty_Trini_Rican 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm, I'll bet 86% of those responses came from the Drudge Report, and 14% from the New York Times. Wonder which of the two has the better-educated readers.
2006-06-22 21:01:26 · answer #4 · answered by Steve H 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ah, more Reich-Wing, mindless, Neo-Con, bullsh*t. Where's the site of the polls? More importantly, be honest and tell us the truth behind the polls, 'cause 90,000 is quite far from the maximum amount of ANY party, meaning the poll was for the Neo-Cancervative American people. Try facts for once, and don't hate 'cause I caught you. You people and your deception...
2006-06-22 21:15:58 · answer #5 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Polls polls polls, ahhh yes, fodder for the brainwashed left. Their anger and blind hatred of GW is because he DOESN'T kow tow to worthless polls. And honestly, if GW discovered the cure for cancer, the libs would be upset because of the out of work lab rats.
2006-06-23 08:56:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
From what I see of America these numbers do not jive unless its from an NRA membership or from the RNC then I could possibly believe them.
2006-06-22 20:58:54 · answer #7 · answered by Neilman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
is it an online poll or an actual poll?
And why did all those Coulter fans vote for Kerry? weird?
2006-06-22 21:01:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Newmax.com, are you on dope!? The neocon web-site is even more conservative than "fair and balanced" FoxNews, go back to school meat head, you need more experience, LMAO!!
2006-06-22 22:06:52 · answer #9 · answered by Dr.Feelgood 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wait-am I supposed to take the poll or care?
2006-06-23 14:55:27 · answer #10 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋