Politics - 16 June 2006

I am absolutely disgusted by the color green!!! If And when I, or anyone I know gets in a position of political power, I'll see to it that the Constitution is amended so that wearing the color green is against the law and unconstitutional.

2006-06-16 08:24:11 · 15 answers · asked by The Truth 3

as the liberals squirm its good to think we have a strong man at the helm and discards these wishy washy liberals

2006-06-16 08:18:36 · 28 answers · asked by pat o 2

I saw the question about burning the flag, and while interesting, I thought it was worded wrong.

When you buy an American flag, it is your property...agree or disagree?

And if you say the American flag is community property..isn't that really code for collectivization (which is a communist idea)

And if you agree it is your property, don't you have the right to dispose of it the way you wish..up to and including making a political statement..IE burning?

I'm not saying I approve of flag burning..

But..keeping in mind..freedom of speech, and freedom to dispose of your own property..even if it an American flag..

Don't you think that a constitutional amendment banning the burning of the flag..abriges property rights and free speech rights..which is what America is partially based upon?

2006-06-16 08:18:33 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

What are your main sources of information? I'm reading a lot of comments and questions on here that seem to come verbatim from the talking heads on television.

2006-06-16 08:13:22 · 21 answers · asked by Brokekid 4

2006-06-16 07:56:21 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

My argument is that it would have been better to use the atomic bombs outside of Tokyo, and say if they didn't surrender, the next one would be on Tokyo.

Some say we shouldn't have used them at all..but if we shouldn't have, how should Japan been forced to surrender?

2006-06-16 07:55:21 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

How is burning the flag desecration, but Republicans stepping all over the constitution Patriotic?

2006-06-16 07:51:51 · 16 answers · asked by collegedebt 3

would you want universal health care in the U.S? But you would have to give 80% of your salary to the goverment?
would you do it? living on 20% of your salary?

all or nothing here.

2006-06-16 07:20:19 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

socialism;emperyalism,fasicm,anarsizm...etc

2006-06-16 07:13:55 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am not asking who has the better policies, but whether the average Democrat voter is smarter than the average Republican voter and vice versa.

2006-06-16 07:02:30 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-16 07:00:47 · 17 answers · asked by NONAME 1

2006-06-16 06:32:30 · 13 answers · asked by Chuck P 3

The evidence stares him in the face every morning as he brushes his teeth with his little Hot Wheels electric toothbrush.

2006-06-16 06:25:24 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-16 06:22:24 · 7 answers · asked by Will W 1

recent history of Americans losing more privacy and freedom.

2006-06-16 06:21:54 · 12 answers · asked by namakota 2

2006-06-16 06:21:51 · 7 answers · asked by rocco 1

2006-06-16 06:16:22 · 16 answers · asked by Jack 1

2006-06-16 06:13:30 · 12 answers · asked by Daniel L 2

From CNN: "In a 256-153 vote, the GOP-led House approved a nonbinding resolution that praises U.S. troops, labels the Iraq war part of the larger global fight against terrorism and says an "arbitrary date for the withdrawal or redeployment" of troops is not in the national interest."

Congress passes countless "resolutions" that do absolutely nothing. They are not laws and are not enforced. They are basically just making a public statement to express their views about certain topics. That's what the election campaign is for!

Your thoughts, please.

2006-06-16 05:53:07 · 12 answers · asked by Karl B 2

2006-06-16 05:51:35 · 13 answers · asked by david c 4

and our govement overthrown how many of us would be concidered terrorist or bush loyalist or insurgents?

2006-06-16 05:49:53 · 23 answers · asked by Urntrede frdtrut 2

2006-06-16 05:49:53 · 40 answers · asked by Dr.Feelgood 5

I THINK SO!

2006-06-16 05:42:03 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-16 05:33:19 · 17 answers · asked by Dr.Feelgood 5

2006-06-16 05:23:27 · 21 answers · asked by Will W 1

Most Dems are against the war in Iraq but were for Clinton's decision to send troops to Kosovo. If you take WMD's out of the equation, Saddam was still committing genocide on the Kurdish population of Iraq with Chemical/Biolocial weapons. In Kosovo, Slobodan Milosovic was committing genocide. How can you have supported Clinton's decision to send troops to Kosovo to stop genocide but then say that without the presence of WMD's we had no reason to send troops into Iraq? Please explain why it was OK in one instance and not in another?

2006-06-16 05:18:04 · 19 answers · asked by The Krieg 3

It seems like national democrats like Nancy Pelosi know more about the French or the Germans than they do folks in Tuscaloosa, Hattiesburg, or Lexington. What do you think?

2006-06-16 05:10:47 · 18 answers · asked by optionseeker1989 3

Even if you are that proud of our president, there has to come a time to remove the sticker.

2006-06-16 05:03:48 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

do you like?

2006-06-16 05:02:19 · 13 answers · asked by Urntrede frdtrut 2

The retirement plan for politicians is absurd. It's no wonder S.S. is so crippled, the politicians have no motivation to fix it, they thought it was good idea to have their own, with built-in automatic raises for inflation, not to mention their spouses are compensated as well. If this doesn't make you mad as hell, then I guess you drank the Kool-Aid too!!

2006-06-16 04:50:29 · 5 answers · asked by vsmak45 2