Other - Politics & Government - November 2007

My research into the topic seems to suggest (suprisingly) that classic liberalism broke into two forms, with most of it going to the modern conservatives. Excluding the recent advance of the "new mugged liberal" neocons, conservatives and classic liberals seem to have more in common. Legal egalitarianism and not economic egalitarianism, free trade and not protectionism, Tom Paine style distrust of large government.

Is this accurate or did i miss a party split somewhere?

2007-11-03 06:57:59 · 5 answers · asked by RAW_IS_JERICHO 4

here for major surgery?

2007-11-03 05:24:34 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'am doing a poll for school and am trying to poll as many as possible. I'am also doing the comparison of the answer with age, so please include if you are older or younger than 18. Answer must be YES, NO, or UNSURE

2007-11-03 05:04:50 · 13 answers · asked by UVHS 3

They made in oath to serve there country.

2007-11-03 04:50:44 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Whichever country you're from, do you feel that Religion is given undue weight in decision making at the highest levels of your government?

Why or Why not? Can you share examples?

2007-11-03 04:02:01 · 19 answers · asked by apocalypso blues 5

Everyone I know here in Istanbul wishes death to the West especially Americans! Have we been fair? Please Be polite if you are going to say something.

2007-11-03 03:46:51 · 27 answers · asked by LoveTurkey 1

there must be something one can do

2007-11-02 21:20:48 · 9 answers · asked by curt stuttgart 1

2007-11-02 18:26:45 · 7 answers · asked by Jfadsl L 1

2007-11-02 17:20:23 · 14 answers · asked by Fedup Veteran 6

Ice once covered most of N. America not too long ago. Can someone tell me what kind of machines we had 50,000 years ago that started melting all the ice?

2007-11-02 17:13:02 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/PatrickJBuchanan/2007/11/02/sinking_currency,_sinking_country

2007-11-02 16:54:04 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

With all the talk about "waterboarding," I wonder how you would feel about the supposed practice of "waterboarding" if it could be used to get a terrorist to reveal the location of a bomb that was planted somewhere in your city.

2007-11-02 16:35:53 · 21 answers · asked by RedThread 2

My Daughter is 26 yrs old and living in another state. She was born in the state that I reside in. She lost her birth certificate and only has her social security card. She told me I can get a copy of her birth certificate, by just showing my I.D. (drivers license) and I have a different last name than her, I am remarried. I just don't think that is true, because then anyone could get anyone's birth certificate. The place I would have to go to get it is 2 hours away and I really don't feel like driving all that way for nothing.
Anyone have any suggestions on how a person that lives in a different state than the one they were born in, gets a copy of their birth certificate.
thanks

2007-11-02 16:01:03 · 4 answers · asked by Boo Radley 4

This video claims that George Bush has met with the leaders of Mexico and Canada to turn our country into part of the North American Union through trade agreements such as Nafta. Any truth to this? If you haven't seen the video, try googling it for a free website.

2007-11-02 14:21:38 · 11 answers · asked by webster_sl 1

2007-11-02 14:20:26 · 35 answers · asked by gopaokay 1

I cant wate for his secont 8 years who is with me?

2007-11-02 14:13:35 · 3 answers · asked by gopaokay 1

an depession soon

2007-11-02 14:13:23 · 9 answers · asked by Dark Horse 1

Do you think it's worth it?

2007-11-02 13:39:08 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

We all know how low their approval ratings were before 9/11 and we know they failed to stop the attack (claiming incompetence) and we know how well the government made out with getting more funding to fight terrorism and getting into two profitable wars, so what makes you think they will stop the next attack when they want to go into Iran?

2007-11-02 12:57:03 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why is that after the fires in California, everyone banned together and worked hard and provided help to themselves, and after Katrina everyone ran around like chickens with their heads cut of blaming the government. Okay so the people in California probably have more money, but that shouldn't effect how well you attempt to help yourself? in other words Why did the people work so well together in Cali. and Why did the people after Katrina blame everyone else??

2007-11-02 12:44:46 · 11 answers · asked by Ellis! 2

2007-11-02 12:33:06 · 3 answers · asked by freddyboy0729 2

that they can only perform once or twice a week? It doesn't sound fair, does it, but is that what it's all about?
(Of course, I know that some women hang in there indefinitely for an assortment of reasons.)

2007-11-02 12:14:19 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Brian Ross ABCNews tonight . He says that it has been known that the procedure has been removed. The option is perhaps the US may need to use it again. BUT why? Only 3 terrorists were subjected to it and no one since 2003? Why the BUZZ?
btw the AG is expected to pass as later today more Democrats approved his appointment...
Idea's here? Are you seeing how elections work? No conspiracies just dirt down politics. As usual. Appreciate your input.

2007-11-02 11:50:11 · 4 answers · asked by Mele Kai 6

drivers licenses with access to our taxpayer provided highways...
immediate help in emergency rooms and even possibly health care...
seats in our publically funded schools for an education...
credit cards by Bank of America...
and on and on....

THEN...what benefit is there to citizenship, except the honor to be drafted and fight for their rights?

2007-11-02 11:46:10 · 5 answers · asked by BowtiePasta 6

Why are americans so easily manupilated and brain washed by the jewish/zionist controlled western media and politicians.

2007-11-02 11:24:02 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Prior to the big government programs, this is how it was done, and we had the exact same level of poverty...no worse, not better, but much less taxation and dependency.

2007-11-02 11:16:47 · 5 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6

Light up for the children do your part.

2007-11-02 11:14:14 · 7 answers · asked by ken s 5

2007-11-02 10:56:51 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071102/ap_on_el_pr/giuliani_cancer_fact_check;_ylt=AiE472fQj7DirIhBjgnblces0NUE
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/a_bogus_cancer_statistic.html
"Rudy Giuliani's latest radio ad, which began airing in New Hampshire this week, draws a stark picture for anyone diagnosed with prostate cancer in England. "I had prostate cancer, five, six years ago," the Republican presidential candidate says in the ad. "My chance of surviving prostate cancer, and thank God I was cured of it, in the United States, 82 percent. My chances of surviving prostate cancer in England, only 44 percent under socialized medicine.”
Giuliani is wrong about that. Fortunately for the English, their chances of surviving prostate cancer are far better than Giuliani claims: The actual five-year survival rate is 74.4 percent, according to the United Kingdom's Office of National Statistics. Even those in the U.S. have a better chance than what Giuliani states..."

Thoughts?

2007-11-02 10:44:29 · 7 answers · asked by It's Your World, Change It 6

2007-11-02 10:41:46 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous