Did Classic Liberalism transform into conservatism?

Question

My research into the topic seems to suggest (suprisingly) that classic liberalism broke into two forms, with most of it going to the modern conservatives. Excluding the recent advance of the "new mugged liberal" neocons, conservatives and classic liberals seem to have more in common. Legal egalitarianism and not economic egalitarianism, free trade and not protectionism, Tom Paine style distrust of large government.

Is this accurate or did i miss a party split somewhere?

Answer 1

You're right, for the most part. Classic liberalism generally involved leaving people to tend to their own affairs in nearly every way, whereas conservatism has a few too many controls inherent in it to be true classic liberalism. It's about the closest we can get to it in these crazy times, though.

Answer 2

Classic Liberalism has an economic component that is part of modern conservatism, but they also supported civil liberties that is now mostly supported by modern Liberals. Only Libertarians are the true to the principles of Classic Liberalism and they are a tiny minority. Although the neocons and religious conservatives are responsible for the recent perversions of modern conservatism, conservatives since WWII have had a bad record on civil liberties. I suggest you also look at the McCarthy era in the 1950's and the conservative reaction to the Supreme Court decisions that expanded individual rights in the 1960's

Answer 3

Classic Liberalism has an economic component that is part of modern conservatism, but they also supported civil liberties that is now mostly supported by modern Liberals. Only Libertarians are the true to the principles of Classic Liberalism and they are a tiny minority. Although the neocons and religious conservatives are responsible for the recent perversions of modern conservatism, conservatives since WWII have had a bad record on civil liberties. I suggest you also look at the McCarthy era in the 1950's and the conservative reaction to the Supreme Court decisions that expanded individual rights in the 1960's

Answer 4

It did no longer human beings merely misuse the awareness liberal. The word is derived from the awareness liberty meaning to be unfastened. this is been used to word to human beings campaigning for social freedoms which contain civil liberties and that's exact used to describe proponents of laissez faire, meaning minimum government interference on an financial point. It truly potential freedom from government interference be that on a social point or in an financial experience. The irony is those campaigning for social liberties in many circumstances are proponent of government law on an financial point; risk-free practices of employees precise and so on. people who prefer greater financial freedoms are no longer in many circumstances proponents of civil liberties. this is rather the case interior the U. S. the place the 'Conservatives' are frequently Christians and so don no longer have self assurance especially social freedoms that contradict the bible. interior the united kingdom as an occasion a greater secular united states a 'liberal' is lots greater probably to anti-government interference on an financial and a social point.

Answer 5

not really.