Other - Politics & Government - September 2007

2007-09-04 11:18:08 · 13 answers · asked by David A 1

2007-09-04 11:06:02 · 2 answers · asked by Tammy L 1

Are you?

2007-09-04 10:56:36 · 8 answers · asked by Glen B 6

What were some important issues, point of views and people involved?? I have a test and need 2 start understanding this plz!

2007-09-04 10:54:19 · 2 answers · asked by metallicarocksgrl 1

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9dba9ba2-5a3b-11dc-9bcd-0000779fd2ac.html

2007-09-04 10:13:45 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-04 09:43:52 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

is there any government body in the US that can do the same?

2007-09-04 09:00:39 · 4 answers · asked by Skidoo 7

It would make it harder for ilegal activites. I am sure the goverment has though about it.

2007-09-04 08:56:35 · 24 answers · asked by south of france 4

2007-09-04 08:34:04 · 14 answers · asked by studiojbb 1

2007-09-04 08:21:19 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or, are they helping to unify American people with their brash and brazen words and techniques?

2007-09-04 08:13:30 · 13 answers · asked by Glen B 6

I hear/see this word used frequently to described pejoratively the conservative right wing agenda. The ppl that are using this word really do not have a grasp on what it really means..i do belive. For instance, I just answered a question referring to "Constitution Week" and if the neocons were going to celebrate it; it had a sarcastic tone. (what this has to with being a neocon is beyond me)

Neocons do not oppose the constitution...they have liberal views on domestic policy (which if anything would mean they support the constitution as a living a document) and conservative views on foriegn policy. This in anyway doesn't make them anti-constitutional.

Thank you for your time...this is more a rhetorical question so you need not answer unless if you would like to enlighten us more on the subject at hand. Or if you feel that I am incorrect in my understanding of the word. I always enjoy a good debate. :)

2007-09-04 07:49:12 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

maybe right now is not a big deal but what if they take it further could it get out of hand ?

2007-09-04 07:35:01 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-04 07:25:31 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

How does it differ from other types of republicans?

2007-09-04 07:19:18 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why are people not completely ashamed to accept "services" from the government?

Such as welfare, housing assistance and other services.

To me it would be like admitting I was a complete failure. Maybe its just me, but I would rather work 3 jobs than take money from someone else for doing NOTHING

2007-09-04 06:42:35 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is it even possible to compare their voting records and look at their platforms and conclude the Hillary is more constitutional and genuine in her beliefs than Ron Paul?

2007-09-04 06:36:53 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

Let's say Texas, for example. If all citizens in the state of Texas agree on becoming a new independent country, would it be possible for them to declare independence?

2007-09-04 06:29:06 · 14 answers · asked by kamelåså 7

"When Bush refuses to answer one way or the other, he comes off as a shady politician who cannot be trusted," said Robert Novak of CNN's The Capital Gang. "He also comes off as an insane mass murderer who kills lots of people and eats them."

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28609

what is the time limit if someone is found conspired to murder? Not aying anyone did, just curious if someone is associated with a mass murder.

2007-09-04 06:19:18 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

So what? Why should any of this be a crime? He may have done something wrong to his wife and family, but is this anyone else's business? And if he's judged to be a hypocrite by the voters (an anti-gay politician who seeks gay sex) isn't that simply an issue for the voters? Where are all you libertarians screaming out how wrong it is to criminalize these kind of activities?

2007-09-04 06:13:57 · 20 answers · asked by Stephen L 6

2007-09-04 05:49:21 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is rape ever right? What about murder?

For those who count yourself among the liberals, do you believe that there are any absolutes? Is the search to be right always the first step to hate, crime, and injustice?

Is the cure to discrimination to be entirely indiscriminate? That is, to never use your knowledge to try and do what is right? Doesn't any rational person have to employ discrimination in any decision he or she makes?

2007-09-04 05:48:55 · 14 answers · asked by replicant21 3

First of all, let me say that I have nothing against smokers. However, I have to say that, like a lot of other people, I don't enjoy having my eyes or my nostrils burn thanks to secondhand smoke. Of course, that's not to mention the fact that studies have conclusively shown that secondhand smoke causes cancer. And anyway, it's not as if people have been completely forbidden to smoke. Rather, it's only in certain public places. I understand that the smoking ban probably inconveniences a lot of people, but can't smokers understand the fact that some of us don't want to breathe in their smoke?

2007-09-04 05:46:34 · 23 answers · asked by tangerine 7

2007-09-04 05:31:35 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

okay this is 1 of those. question of the day. . from a website, im in.. the Q: the independence of decleration contains a list of grievences(englishactions against the colonies) 2 which the colonist objected,1 of those grievance was..?

" he has exited domestic insurrections among us, and has endoavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers the merciless indian savages, whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

A. what is the british king being accused of doing ??

B.is their a word or a phrase in this passage that is used to arouse the reader emotion ??

C.so. not just based on this. BUT are their other easons for the narive americans to attack frontier settlemnets??

2007-09-04 04:22:06 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-04 03:28:43 · 14 answers · asked by september_serenade 1

"if men were angels, no gov. would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither externals nor internal controls on gov. would be necessary"?

WHY !! why ? does he think gov. is needed?

and speaking of which why does he think it needs to be, controlled. i mean.does he think that man will .."get greedy" so to speak ??

2007-09-04 03:13:10 · 2 answers · asked by roman d 1

i know and want to know that how many indians know it

2007-09-04 02:53:07 · 7 answers · asked by Anuvrat 1

Where was the election held that deemed the president of the USA was judge, jury and executioner? What say you?
PS. Hope China is not as judgemental when it takes the title of No.1 super-power.

2007-09-04 02:34:46 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I've been influenced by some conspiracy theories lately ( New World Order) and I really believe things are going to happen in the next 20/30 years. I strongly believe that America will try to seize power over the earth and that we will have an Orwellian state. I also believe that there will be a great war within 40 years of reactionists against the New World Order. Who believes me and which side will you choose?
I will choose the reactionists, even though I'm a pacifist and against killing.
ANARCHY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-09-04 02:25:16 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous