1. A system of academic selection in public (state) schools, for all its defects and biases, is preferable to an "egaliatarian" system by which children are allocated to schools based on residence area or lottery. Yes, academic selection might give the middle class an advantage, but bright children from poor families would benefit as well, and the competition to get into selective schools would force children to study harder.
SOME Americans and Europeans have told me that "competition is not good for children". Nonsense. Everywhere in Asia, bright children thrive on competition. And in any competiiton, some people will always come out ahead. It's not unfair, it's just life.
2. I would prefer having a meritocratic House of Lords composed of (or elected by) the intellectual elite. It should be a counterbalance to popular sentiment and somewhat disconnected from the masses. After all, do the masses really know what is best?
Comments and feedback appreciated.
2007-06-18
15:52:26
·
4 answers
·
asked by
mmhmmm
2