Other - Politics & Government - April 2007

A) anarchist
B) liberal
C) conservative
D) republican
F) democrat
G)....add to my list please and dnt forget 2 pic one!

2007-04-18 17:16:41 · 8 answers · asked by ClAiR BeAr! 2

I mean really why do I have to see this guy everytime I log in. Why not show the Victims of this tragedy? Lets not go and make him look like the victim here.

2007-04-18 16:31:29 · 11 answers · asked by Miracle Mets 1

Yesterday I met a business man, born in Turkey, whose family had been murdered by Islamic Militants and ONLY because they were Jewish. This mans perspective on America was interesting, especially in that he recognizes the same Muslim takeover in America as he saw in his own country. He expressed frustration over the "blindness" of liberals in this country, most of whom have never been under and/or seen oppression the likes of which he has lived, much less lost their entire families.

2007-04-18 16:29:38 · 16 answers · asked by Terrie 3

and please explain why you have come to that conclusion.

2007-04-18 16:27:24 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

Terrorism is at an all time high. There are FREAKS everywhere (in case you have not noticed) and the solution from the Lib's is to disarm America as if that will stop the crime. All that will guarantee is that Americans will be going to a gun fight with a water pistol.

2007-04-18 16:21:49 · 12 answers · asked by Terrie 3

they aren't getting their own way anymore? With the power ebbing away - drip by drip by drip - their fanaticism seems to increase whilst their sense of purpose is vanishing?
No more family values to cram down everyones throat,no more tax and spend Democrats what with Bush's obscene war costs,no more we are the Moral anything,etc....
Gee-all they claimed is turned to dust by their greed,hypocrisy and love of power for it's own sake.
Could this be why one can practically feel many of them foaming at the mouth through their answers/questions ?

2007-04-18 16:08:49 · 7 answers · asked by Your Teeth or Mine? 5

Several countries - Austrailia, Brittian, Canada, etc. all had huge gun bans after mass murder shootings. All of the bans caused violent crime to rise exponentially and stay that way? Seriously, I really want to know what the logic is behind this. Are the facts and figures wrong? If anyone can show them to me I waould appreciate it.

2007-04-18 15:16:56 · 8 answers · asked by Lancaid 3

Can you believe this guy violated gun control policies? Maybe we should make more gun laws, cause more laws would have stopped him for sure. It's a good thing nobody shot back too because that would have been illegal.

2007-04-18 15:11:10 · 8 answers · asked by Lancaid 3

Within reason, of course. If some future evidence comes out about BushCo involvement in something horrible, etc., more crimes committed, worse lies...further than has come to light already...you get a pass. So you can base "no matter what" on right now.

I'm not trying to start a fight, I am just wondering how many of you are completely loyal to the Republican party.

2007-04-18 14:50:52 · 14 answers · asked by justagirl33552 4

WHEN they take those states do we enforce immigration laws in the remaining states?

2007-04-18 14:46:03 · 6 answers · asked by william n 3

In 1968 george w. bush graduated with a degree in history, but apparently didn't follow current events...........
Your opinion?

2007-04-18 13:30:12 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-18 13:24:14 · 11 answers · asked by Lee 2

Liberals, conservatives, repugs, libtards.
You idiots don't even read questions.
All you do is determine if the askers bent is liberal or conservative, then you pounce, like kittens on catnip.
I haven't read a good answer on here in three days.
so I posted a few questions, that have no basis whatsoever, and guess what? I got lots of answers.
Me, i ignore questions that are obviously garbage. But the idiots here love name calling don't ya?????

2007-04-18 13:15:43 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

We're hearing conservative gums flapping constantly about "activist judges", yet they're fine with activism on the Supreme Court. More and more frequently, their judges are making partisan stands in SCOTUS decisions without regard for what the Constitution and prior law/decisions actually say. (Such as today's "partial birth abortion" decision.)

Should the justices be making decisions along partisan lines, as we see increasingly happening, or should they deviate from their current course of action and actually make choices based on Constitutional law?

2007-04-18 13:09:41 · 7 answers · asked by leftist1234 3

It is true that people use guns to kill people.
One must be a evil and unloving person to kill people.
Unfortunately America has A LOT of unloving people.
650,000+ registered sex offenders live in the United States of America.
3 to 5 times that amount have committed a sexual offense without
being arrested and convicted.
Therefore guns do not kill people.
Americans kill people.

2007-04-18 13:07:26 · 19 answers · asked by David K 4

Why is it so hard for one to find an opinion from a USA citizen that doesn’t agree with its external policy?

I am aware that there must be internal opposition against USA government. But were the Americans who voted for this administration (twice)!
I don’t understand how it is possible for someone to justifie 650.000 deaths with the excuse of “we are trying to democratize IRAQ” or the “defence from terrorism” when it’s very much obvious that the oil is the only reason for their presence there.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1892888,00.html
(Refugee humanitarian crisis coming up)

Do Americans really believe that there are evil countries?
I’m not cynical and say that the USA is the evil country; we can read this a lot as well! Actually, when an American is accused of stealing the oil should reply with "what kind of oil do you use?

But the fact still remains; the world keeps hating you. Many countries have their one share of death/guilt but you don’t see so much hypocrisy

2007-04-18 11:57:50 · 6 answers · asked by elcabong 2

I believe that it would be if we didn't hide the process so much. I believe that public executions should be televised so that it would serve as a warning to those thinking about committing a crime. No worse than what Hollywood puts out these days. Do you remember the audio of Nick Berg? Chilling wasn't it? You would get more people's attention if you did this.(not the beheading way) We are too political correct in this country these days. What say you?

2007-04-18 11:15:48 · 21 answers · asked by haterade 3

We need to help those seals from dying. We dont want those those killers to stop killing them next year, we want them to stop NOW!

2007-04-18 10:38:45 · 8 answers · asked by Joanne:) 1

Here are a few quotes from my last question in regards to how liberal gun cnotrol policies result in more violent crimes, lets take a look:

#1 "If there were an anti gun policy in place this foreign student would not have gone to a gun shop and purchased a gun BECAUSE THERE WOULD BE NO GUN STORE.

Let me make it simple NO GUNS = NO SHOOTING SPREE"


#2 "You're telling people to protect themselves FROM guns WITH guns.

Gun control laws seek to REMOVE guns from the entire picture."
-----------------------------------------

Let me say this clearly and anyone who does not see where I am coming from please ask and I will clarify.

Do you truly believe that banning guns from being sold legally will in some way NOT allow criminals to obtain guns? Look at Washington D.C., some of the strictest gun control laws and yet the highest crime rates.

Getting a gnu on the black market is easy. These guns do not come from gun stores of gun shows, they come from other countries.

2007-04-18 10:38:28 · 19 answers · asked by libh8r13f 2

tell me please.

2007-04-18 10:38:06 · 3 answers · asked by fiyer411 2

2007-04-18 10:34:47 · 10 answers · asked by Michael B 1

2007-04-18 10:16:36 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-18 09:54:08 · 6 answers · asked by samanthakhz 2

2007-04-18 08:17:18 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

are handed out with every happy meal?

its not like they give out guns for so many prize tickets and chucky cheese.

2007-04-18 08:02:30 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-18 08:00:42 · 14 answers · asked by Jose R 6

2007-04-18 07:42:36 · 21 answers · asked by samanthakhz 2

2007-04-18 07:33:17 · 21 answers · asked by BOB 4

can (or will) Republicans answer this question without making assumptions?

2007-04-18 07:29:36 · 26 answers · asked by samanthakhz 2

Isn't it curious that the parents of gun-murdered children dont really argue about keeping it easy to walk in and purchase a pocket sized gun of choice? I think those parents might know something more about it than the rest of us.

2007-04-18 07:13:01 · 14 answers · asked by samanthakhz 2