Other - Politics & Government - March 2007

I'm just saying that if we sent a few of these questions up to capital hill we would see improvement the speed of fifty tanks going across a Middle Eastern desert.

2007-03-12 06:52:33 · 9 answers · asked by reuby02 2

He said he did. Do y ou believe him? I don't mean the kind of one-way converstation (prayer) that we all do but instead the two way converation where God speaks back in an audible voice.

2007-03-12 06:52:12 · 15 answers · asked by Lou 6

Please explain why or why not. Thanks. I am really intrested in this topic.

2007-03-12 06:41:03 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

I've been taking an incresing notice to this over the past few years. Is this the result of living in a very liberal, anti-white society (I'm referring to the culture in the USA).

With the ever growing statistics of black on white violence, are whites simply just afraid to fight back? Is America going to become the next South Africa? America's white population is currently at 67%.

It seems that vicious black on white violence is constantly being overlooked, and in the rare cases when it is acknowledged, its somehow justified or seen as no big deal. No matter how openly racist or violently hateful they are, there is never any condemnation of their actions. Hollywood, The media and other institutions of the like always portray blacks as either being the victims or glamorized sexual icons or intellectual etc....a huge disparity with the reality of society.
Observe:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6exvfnkel...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_izIyJn84fo

2007-03-12 06:40:03 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

at their own game (capitalism)? And if so, how can the American middle class make it back to the top?

2007-03-12 06:35:35 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

That was one of the best shows ever, with mad tv, the colbert report, and the daily show in close seconds.

2007-03-12 06:35:16 · 5 answers · asked by beagun0 1

Heard her say on a interview this morning that she is the JFK for our time. Buwhahahahahaha.

2007-03-12 06:29:36 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

that america invades countrys for personal benifit
iraq oil
vietnam opium
afganistan opium
somalia went in realised nothing there and got out
now lets be and rude and ignorant as i know you all are

2007-03-12 06:23:53 · 18 answers · asked by mario 3

Instead of wasting time creating political talking points the leadership should deal with pressing issues facing this country not give moral support to our enemies by attacking our military. It is upsetting that Pelosi and Reed have tried to assume the office of president when they are not in that office. The constitution gave the president the command of the military not the speaker of the house and majority leader. Wise up dummycrats and do what you were elected to do. Backing out of Iraq was not why, it was to gain victory in Iraq.

2007-03-12 06:22:51 · 16 answers · asked by mr conservative 5

Just saw a news story on TV where scientists that question global warming are having thier lives threatened, funding cut etc. Are the global warming tards really this desperate to stop people with brains from saying the truth?

2007-03-12 06:19:52 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I know that I have waited tirelessly in many government lines, to include but not limited to, the DMV and U.S. passport (etc.), but what would make government provided healthcare any quicker? Can you imagine waiting months to see a doctor, when before it was just weeks? Right now, it's basically on an appointment basis, but what if you were waiting on a first come first serve basis and that basis included every American citizen.

For example:

A whopping 74 percent of Canadians were concerned about long waits for access to emergency room services, while seven percent said they or a member of their household had suffered deteriorating medical conditions as a result of delays in access for care over the past year. Two percent of Canadians actually reported that a member of their household had died waiting for health care.

The estimated number of Canadians waiting for medical care also rose from 840,358 in 1999 to 878,008 in 2000-01, or over 2.85% of the total Canadian population of 30.8 million. To put these figures into perspective, if the U.S. had the same health system as Canada almost7.9 million Americans would be waiting for treatment.

How would our health care be better if it was provided by the government?

2007-03-12 06:18:39 · 2 answers · asked by Derrick 3

Is it me or is middle class disappearing?

2007-03-12 06:11:09 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Then why are they defending NON-Americans? This organization needs to rethink it's direction... this is a land of MAJORITY rule ..isn't that why we VOTE!

2007-03-12 06:08:36 · 12 answers · asked by Robert P 6

I will be going to CA in the summer to go to college. I will need to establish California residency for the following years to save money.

What do I need to do this?

2007-03-12 06:06:29 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

give ideas,are you willing to take up the cause and what are you doing about it?

2007-03-12 05:49:16 · 16 answers · asked by raindovewmn41 6

Can you say you are a great nation if every nation disagree with you?

2007-03-12 05:47:51 · 8 answers · asked by Jose R 6

2007-03-12 05:36:22 · 8 answers · asked by Jose R 6

:o)

2007-03-12 05:28:04 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

I notice this from both conservatives and liberals. Is this just to start arguments or do you think most posters are generally legitimate?

2007-03-12 05:18:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why does he finance move.org thats attacks Halliburton?

2007-03-12 05:17:43 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-12 05:13:33 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

I've deleted and reposted it a number of times, and it does not pop up on the list?

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AmIXJGe3R9F4Zj4gHZ.WcJ_sy6IX?qid=20070312085047AAo7W30

2007-03-12 04:56:59 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Should someone be treated differently based on the amount of money they earn?

Not meaning if they purchase services, but basic rights, rules, allowances because they make x amount of money?

-----

If no, then why do you support higher taxes for people who work hard and earn more money?

Why is it fair to charge 33% (and when its lowered to 30% you scream "tax cut for the rich") income tax for one person,

20% for another,

and 8-0% for even another person?

2007-03-12 04:50:47 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-12 04:40:07 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

John (hit em hard) prescott, was annoyed this week, because he was voted only third, by the National Gurning Association.
he thought he was a natural gurner, but he was beaten into second place by Sheree Blair. Does anyone know who won
this competition?

2007-03-12 04:37:50 · 5 answers · asked by alf w 3

First is the government want to ban incandescent lamp in ours home, I know in a way it going to save a lot of energy, but in some way we might lost ours privacy, Second is they're trying to ban N word, I know that N word is not good, but in a way don't we loose ours first amendment, Third is they're trying to ban booing during any game, I know this action could let to riot, but come on don't they have other thing to worry about like diease, war on terror, war middle class, war on health, war within, New Orlean, murder rate across country, gang, etc.

2007-03-12 04:37:11 · 5 answers · asked by madcow 1

should someone be treated differently becuase how much money they earn?

2007-03-12 04:31:35 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-12 04:26:20 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Just curious to see who can argue which one is better.

2007-03-12 04:16:14 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-12 04:14:47 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous