Hitler by far.
2007-03-12 05:31:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Well, I don't think Bush belongs in this question. So we'va lost a wopping 3,000 soldiers in 4 years of war. If you still think Bush belongs on this list, then you are very naive. This goes between Hitler and Saddam. Even though Saddam murdered about 1.5 million of his own people during his dictatorship. I think the winning circle belongs to Hitler. If you're smart, this won't have to be explained to you. If you still want an explanation, just e-mail me and I will spend the time to further educate you.
2007-03-12 12:52:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Actually, Stalin has killed the most at over 11 million, followed by Hitler, 6 - 7 million ish, and Bush is a long way off, but then, he aint finished yet. Then Saddam. Saddam has killed (in reputable figures) about 300,000 in direct executions. Bush is responsible for the chaos in Iraq that has led to the additional deaths of 600,000 people.
2007-03-12 12:33:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by kenhallonthenet 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
Josef Stalin
2007-03-12 18:56:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cyrano de Bergerac 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hitler
2007-03-12 12:31:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by David L 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Out of those Hitler was responsible for more deaths. The Jews, his own country men who opposed him. Foreign political enemies. The country's soldiers he was at war with and his own who died at the hands of a man who had a 'dream' for Germany.
2007-03-13 08:30:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jo H 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hitler, then Saddam then Bush. The only one that actually did any killing was Hitler, when he did the world a favor and killed himself.
2007-03-12 12:40:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by George P 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
1) Mao Tse-Tung
2) Josef Stalin
3) Adolph Hitler
4) Pol Pot
Actually, both Bush and Saddam Hussein would be pretty far down of the all-time list, although I suspect Bush would bear out Saddam at this point.
2007-03-16 23:22:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by dirty t 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bush of course.
You may ask why?
Well, with the current killings of Iraqis, Afghanis, Muslims in general, etc, the amount of people dead is not comparable to some other radical leaders.
BUT, with the new reputation and image Bush has given to America, we have more enemies than ever. So in turn, in the future, due to Bush's radical ideals and faulty running of American government, he will in turn kill more people than all of the above persons in your question described. Mission accomplished Bush; United we Fall.
2007-03-18 14:37:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by superisa2001lbs 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
At this point in time, Hitler! And that is a fact! He had millions of Jews killed! Now that doesn't include whoever else he had killed for whatever reasons!
2007-03-12 12:33:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by LilbitFiery:) 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
hi.
i really found your question very interisting to every one who is human in this world .so let's talk about the truth without looking to our origines or languages or religions (im berber and muslim ) but try to understand my ideas and don't look at me .
killing people can be direct or indirect ,for example to kill or to send someone to kill .without talking about the reasons of killing let login in to your question....
every body in the world knows that saddam killed people in Iraq(sheite and kurd people ) at least he was saying that they want to kill him .and all the time when he visites that regions he must go with army to protect him....but he hadn't any right to kill people by the way he did ...but the main important point for me is the number of dead ...there were few handreds ......
for bush i will i will not talk about any thing else except the number ..catastroph they were thousands of dead from afghanistan, iraq why ?????? in afghanistan bcs he was looking for group of people so he killed childreen ,women and old people ...in iraq the american companies need iraqi petrol and israel needs to be alone there then he killed thousands too what do you think my friend ?
2007-03-12 15:32:24
·
answer #11
·
answered by abdulaziz m 1
·
1⤊
1⤋