Other - Politics & Government - February 2007

both from a logistics standpoint (number of troops, planes and money needed) and from a public support standpoint?

I mean, granted if they blatantly attack us... we would do something... but I just don't see us attacking them under the current circumstances...

2007-02-10 08:45:27 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-10 08:36:22 · 14 answers · asked by ken m 2

Do the town officials simply vote the matter in themselves by majority at a town meeting ? What is the role of the public?

2007-02-10 08:33:49 · 2 answers · asked by Barbara F 1

2007-02-10 08:25:25 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

To let you know in its inception and in their origianl constitution is states by their founder "communisim is the goal" WAKE UP AMERICA, STOP THE LIES. THIS COUNTRY NEEDS TO GO BACK TO BEING FOR THE PEOPLE BY THE PEOPLE.

2007-02-10 08:16:04 · 12 answers · asked by 4sanity 3

2007-02-10 08:13:32 · 1 answers · asked by Luis R 4

2007-02-10 08:06:06 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

is there still justification for a civil rights movement in the united states? Support answers with specific statistics and evidence?

2007-02-10 08:03:29 · 4 answers · asked by lena 1

Please name the body that regulates them. Are they good or bad? Do they do the job that they are set out to do?

2007-02-10 07:09:35 · 5 answers · asked by Lavenderrose 2

2007-02-10 06:38:20 · 14 answers · asked by majennin 1

These are the same people that did not think that the Soviet Union was a threat. They are so sad the Iron Curtain came down. Why do they support terrorism?

2007-02-10 05:52:01 · 10 answers · asked by Damn Good Dawg 3

2007-02-10 05:24:43 · 6 answers · asked by munkimonika 3

"A leading figure in the Bush administration's march to war in Iraq helped justify the 2003 invasion by undercutting the CIA with questionable intelligence about Saddam Hussein's links to al Qaeda, a Pentagon watchdog agency said in a report on Friday.

Former U.S. defense policy chief Douglas Feith presented the White House with claims of a "mature symbiotic relationship" between Iraq and al Qaeda as if they were facts, while ignoring contradictory views from the intelligence community, the report by the Pentagon inspector general said."

Source:
'Pentagon official's prewar intel faulted'
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2007-02-10T014637Z_01_N09348898_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ-USA-REPORT.xml&src=rss

2007-02-10 05:22:54 · 16 answers · asked by BeachBum 7

2007-02-10 05:18:41 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

And why if yes or no. I personally am of the opinion that as the symbol of a government of the people should be commercialized under heavy taxation at the very least. Corporate logos get more protection by the system than the flag.

2007-02-10 05:05:52 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

wouldn't that already be considered a US victory in the Iraq war? US troops might not be able to stop the sectarian violence, get the electricity working full time in Baghdad, or make sure a Democracy works in Iraq but whether you agree w/ the war or not they are winning the war on terror simply by engaging the terrorists 24/7 and in a mess like Iraq that is a US victory. No???

2007-02-10 04:44:19 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

why do people credit Bush with no terrorist attacks in America for 5 years?

2007-02-10 04:40:09 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Which is it? Something we caused, and can reverse, or an inevitable fact of nature that politicians want to have power over?

2007-02-10 04:39:36 · 16 answers · asked by artboy34 3

I paid extra for my diesel and thought it was more economical in the long run

Nope

Soon Road tolls from satellites

We have Congestion Charges in London but still congestion

Now the NightMayor is extending it west

Road tax duty on emmissions are much higher now for nearly all vechiles now not just Chelsea tractors


Ever feel turned over

2007-02-10 04:37:51 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

911 happened long time ago, yet Osama is still free and relatively unmolested. Have the american people been conned ?

2007-02-10 04:24:15 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

The answer should be very simple.It should not exceed 35characters.The best answers will be specially awarded by me

2007-02-10 04:17:52 · 24 answers · asked by bhuvana g 1

after reading a few questions on here, i looked into the UKIP, and i think ive seen the light at the end of the tunnel. i just wanted to encourage people to have a look, as many disgruntled voters seem to think the BNP is the answer to our prayers. Dont get me wrong on the surface bnp policies sound okish, but ive never been happy about the racism element, im not trying to preach, im just glad i looked and maybe you will be too.

2007-02-10 04:11:49 · 15 answers · asked by slsvenus 4

2007-02-10 03:34:45 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Political/partisan reasons aside (The valid reasons). Why do I see so many statements by cons about Hillary's ability to be President based on her husband's affair? I have actually read a question that said "If she can't satisfy her husband, how can she satisfy a nation?" If your spouse cheats on you do you automatically become unable to function? Am I the only person who sees the stupidity and childishness of this? One of our greatest Presidents JFK, was a known philanderer. If people don't agree with her politics that is one thing, but is berating her for a cheating husband the best the Cons can come up with? Seriously.

2007-02-10 03:29:25 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

In USA Deception is overwhelming & the truth is rare, is everywhere else like this?

2007-02-10 02:56:33 · 7 answers · asked by bulabate 6

2007-02-10 01:50:06 · 22 answers · asked by Richard M 2

we cant buy a blackjack now but you can buy white chocolate why is this not been renamed as natural chocolate, has anybody else got views on this subject?

2007-02-10 01:42:29 · 23 answers · asked by steve738494 3

I read an answer where a poster claimed that slavery and oppression in the democracy of the United States is responsible for the Civil Rights movement.

Many countries in the Americas had slavery. Australia had a large population of people of color and slavery. Only in the United States did slavery and oppression result in a "civil rights revolution".

Is that true, does the civil rights/human rights movement have its foundation in slavery and oppression in the United States and if so, why?

2007-02-10 01:28:16 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://youtube.com/watch?v=8x5LD52Ek9o

2007-02-10 01:03:04 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

They help USA during war time, and what they get in return??? Not every country agrees with this war.

2007-02-10 01:02:57 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous