English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Political/partisan reasons aside (The valid reasons). Why do I see so many statements by cons about Hillary's ability to be President based on her husband's affair? I have actually read a question that said "If she can't satisfy her husband, how can she satisfy a nation?" If your spouse cheats on you do you automatically become unable to function? Am I the only person who sees the stupidity and childishness of this? One of our greatest Presidents JFK, was a known philanderer. If people don't agree with her politics that is one thing, but is berating her for a cheating husband the best the Cons can come up with? Seriously.

2007-02-10 03:29:25 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

I am glad most people understand my point. It is acceptable to not like her politics, but marriage resaons? Great point Lizardmama! Thanks.

2007-02-10 03:48:23 · update #1

PinkPanther...type in Hillary Clinton on YA and read the questions and answers, you will find remarks about her inability to lead because of Bill's affairs, MANY, MANY times. Again, if you don't agree with her, that is fine, I just don't understand why stupid people keep using Bill's affairs as reasons to disqualify her as a viable candidate.

2007-02-10 04:33:24 · update #2

Ada....Are you on meds? Maybe you should be, or give me concrete indisputable proof of these allegations.

2007-02-10 05:16:18 · update #3

16 answers

I think that's the most ignorant and ridiculous reason my fellow conservatives can come up with. I have only heard this said by young people or uninformed people who couldn't tell you anything about her record, her policies, her ideologies, or her agenda. Those are the things to be opposed to! I don't like Hillary for any hundred of the reasons she gives me, but none of them has anything to do with her family life or her philandering husband. If anything, I might not understand her staying with him through the public humiliation- unless it was to bolster her own bid for office- but that's a lot of speculation that is really irrelevant. If she chose to honor her marriage, then good for her choice. But it has no bearing on her fitness for office. I feel that she is unfit for office because of her policies and agenda. People who focus on other non-issues are simply uninformed. "If she can't satisfy her husband, how can she satisfy a nation?" What?! Do they think she wants to be a president or a hooker? Absolutely ignorant!

2007-02-10 03:42:02 · answer #1 · answered by lizardmama 6 · 1 2

I don't recall seeing anywhere that it said that was the reason why she wouldn't make a good president. One main reason why she won't make a good president is the fact that she likes to omit certain facts when addressing audiences. For example she says that she would support a bill for notification of parents in the event their minor wants an abortion as long as their was a clause for medical emergencies and a way for the girl to petition a judge if she was mature enough yet she campaigned against a bill in California that has those same clauses and wouldn't let her tape recorded message be played publicly anywhere else but California. Also she wants to raise taxes claiming shes going to give it to the common good. I work hard for my money and I can decide what charities I want to give to, I don't need the government to decide that for me.

2007-02-10 04:27:46 · answer #2 · answered by pinkpanthergrrrrr 1 · 1 0

I accept as true with you that we would want to always have get entry to to third-social gathering concepts that exhibits basically how in touch she change into even as he change into President. Obama does no longer have a lot important adventure. He has been interior the Senate for 3 years, yet has spent a variety of years campaigning. Clinton has seven years interior the Senate and has spent a variety of years campaigning. Their previous adventure as lawyer, propose, state legislator isn't very important. I understand why you do not pick to launch information even as operating for political workplace because they're going for use antagonistic to you. in spite of the undeniable fact that, there might want to be some biographies on Hillary Clinton that discuss her function as first woman of Arkansas and us of a. the information media has did not its job and has presented us no concepts about the applicants' skills and adventure. With Hillary, I anticipate that bill will be positioned to artwork to get her as a lot as velocity, so if her adventure is lacking, i'm no longer too afflicted. yet, i'm worried about Barack.

2016-10-17 06:21:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hillary would not be a good choice for President for numerous reasons.
1. She defied a subpoena to turn over documents from her previous law firm.
2. She lied about this same topic, saying she had no idea where the records were.
3. Later, those records she claimed she had no idea of their location, were found in the living quarters of the White House
4. Hillary constantly "flip-flops" on her stand on almost any topic, depending what the latest poll says.
5. Her latest thing is about taking profits away from a legal company doing business in the U.S.
6. Thus far, Hillary will NOT speak before an open forum about topics that concern Americans today. She will only allow pre-printed questions given to people in the audience where she has rehearsed her replies. What is she hiding?
I could care less what goes on in her and Bill's bedroom, but Hillary is a strong Marxist...we have no need of her Marxist ideas in our Govt.

2007-02-10 03:41:58 · answer #4 · answered by jonn449 3 · 5 2

Consider the time JFK let 200 American soldiers to die. Just ordered others to pull out and let them die. Now for Hillary, she really needs to take a stand on which side of the fence she needs to go on. She really needs to stop blaming others for her own short comings. She voted for a war, if she didn't read the files that is her fault. As far as a cheating husband, if she is stupid enough to stay, oh well. A sucker is born everyday.

2007-02-10 03:37:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

No, thats not the best argument that we can come up with. Just remember where you are. There are plenty of these no factual basis, bash the other side questions comeing from people from both sides of the aisle.

Hillary would be terrible as president because she is not a leader, she is more like a dictator. Follow me or I will crush you is not the way to pull the country in the right direction.

2007-02-10 03:34:40 · answer #6 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 4 4

Hillary Clinton shoul;d not be our next president because her family is into forming incestrial whore houses through the F.B.I. it started with Bill Clinton's marrital afairs . As for JFK he was married to his own cousin and she was busy at home with a serigate father for their daughter's birth. The serigate father was a mystery man running the Mercks Pharmacutical Plant. That family just developed the amthrack drug to help Hillary with her election. My mother was killed by Hillary's presidential campain demands and I will not let her be the next president. They have been getting their money funds from Mercks Pharmacutical Company and bragged they have more money then God. They are also playing games with Catholic Churchs during the Bush Error because the people got Clinton to admit after denying that he was related to Bush. Bush's real last name is Hess. Bush is also related to his Husband Laura Bush and he is setting up the FBI agency with molested children to keep the people excepting of how the Bush and Clinton era is going .They know the Kennedy family covered ups had to do with fictious I.Ds and cover-ups.

2007-02-10 05:04:36 · answer #7 · answered by Ada M 1 · 0 5

Actually it isn't that he cheated on her and their life went on. He cheated on her and it became a national scandal including lying for almost a whole year at taxpayers expence and she backed him up. Now it isn't that she stood by him because a lot of wives will but that she did it for her own political agenda. If she'll go this far to stay political we don't want her to sell the US out for this same reason. It's the scandals and the coverups that has me down on her.

2007-02-10 03:35:43 · answer #8 · answered by Mercadies2000 7 · 4 3

It's nice to see libs take message board postings seriously. Great information strategy.

2007-02-10 03:37:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Anyone who wants to see the weakening, divided, village idiot of USA should vote for her. She's got my vote.

2007-02-10 03:52:42 · answer #10 · answered by Adi 2 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers