both from a logistics standpoint (number of troops, planes and money needed) and from a public support standpoint?
I mean, granted if they blatantly attack us... we would do something... but I just don't see us attacking them under the current circumstances...
2007-02-10 08:45:27 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
yes, I could see like a nuke site airstrike kind of thing... but not major invasion...
2007-02-10 08:57:18 · update #1
You are right we would not invade Iran at this time unless attacked, but don't you think it would be a good idea to have a large number of troops close be in case they do do something stupid?
2007-02-10 08:49:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it really is damn close not obtainable to over-exaggerate the price of this impediment. the subsequent 3 factors make this such an explosive cocktail that could blow up in our faces: a million. Iran is organising nuclear "vigor" which it genuinely does not choose, wisely that's organising a nuclear bomb. 2. If Iran does escalate a nuclear bomb below the radar of the west then it really is going to be powerfuble to employ it in besides it needs because it has not signed the proliferation treaty. 3. The president of Iran is an complete and utter madman. he has already denied that there are any homosexuals in his u . s . and expressed a prefer to "wipe Israel off the map". it really is for those causes that i trust that the west may ought to launch a pre-emptive strike in the route of Iran. it really is going to be now previously than that's too previous due and we are up in the route of a u . s . with nuclear guns.
2016-11-26 22:06:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This will go up for a vote and congress will need to vote on this just like they did for Iraq. We would also need to go to the UN. This is not just a simple thing here . Let's use a little common sense here folks. If they attack us, we will STILL need a vote.
2007-02-10 08:59:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seriously, your question is very stupid. The USA doesn't need to invade Iran to stop them.
I wonder why didn't you mention that Iran has taken its population hostage. The mullahs are building their nuclear weapons under schools, hospitals and neiborhoods; but you liberals don't care about that. Do you?
2007-02-10 08:59:21 · answer #4 · answered by Bonneville P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We won't invade. We will just bomb their nuke & missile sites & maybe try to decapitate their govt as well.
2007-02-10 08:49:12 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't doubt the capabilities nor the existence of intention.
2007-02-10 08:54:16 · answer #6 · answered by Jose R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
remember hitler lost the second world war because he fought on two fronts
2007-02-10 08:55:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say long time ago we are waiting too long...
2007-02-10 08:56:49 · answer #8 · answered by nena_en_austin 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋