English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Other - Politics & Government - January 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

2007-01-02 04:56:43 · 5 answers · asked by daveyamor 1

and why

2007-01-02 04:54:40 · 6 answers · asked by joey s 1

After all, BOTH countries seem to have a total nutter in charge.
Are Iranians more "expendable" than Americans?
If nuclear weapons are true deterrants surely everyone should have them?. (Look how conventional fighting has decreased between India and Pakistan, look how Europe no longer fights inwardly after a thousand years of European conflict.)
I believe that the two countries most likely to use nukes are USA and Israel (Against Arabs), If a few Arab countries are nuked-up this would cease to be as likely.
The only justification for Iran not nuking-up would be "survival of the fittest (or richest), which is essentially racist anyway and should not be enshrined in international law. One law for the rich etc.
I ask again. Why don't Iranians deserve the same protection as Americans?

2007-01-02 04:51:21 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

I vote for France, N. Korea, and Iran.

2007-01-02 04:47:43 · 15 answers · asked by dropping_k 1

We SHOULD be able to put whatever we feel like putting on OUR OWN Property,... But guess what? We Cant!It's Illegal! even though its YOUR property!
the Zoning Law people have Ownership of YOUR property!!!
Donald Trump is :White,rich and Famous,...and even HE cant put a U.S. Flag up on one of His OWN buildings! !!!!!

Whats UP with that?

2007-01-02 04:24:45 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-02 04:15:12 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

You have not won against them in the past, Korea 1952 etc Force out in the mid 1970's in Vietnam! China was supplying men & materials to these two conflicts!

2007-01-02 04:11:11 · 7 answers · asked by bulabate 6

Are you so dense as to believe that NO OTHER US PRESIDENT could have done a better job handling the aftermath of 9/11 and other related issues BETTER than your beloved G.W. Bush, the same man whom you seem to give a no-holds-barred free pass to do anything he wants?

Please tell us again about his upstanding Christian morals, his robust and fearless personal Military record that makes him a born fighter, and how terrible any one else who has, or could have been President would have handled this.

Agree or not?

2007-01-02 04:01:14 · 19 answers · asked by Middy S 2

We know that Liberals in America and the Eurotrash cowards were too scared to step in and stop Saddam Hussein's regime from committing genocide against 500,000 people, and that they would have rolled over for Hitler, but do you think they'd finally step up and fight if their daughters were being raped by Al Qaeda members. I say that they would try to negotiate with the rapist of their daughters.

2007-01-02 03:55:22 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

i think they do

2007-01-02 03:42:35 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

spent in IRAQ...so far... were not better spent rebuilding areas destroyed by hurricane KATRINA?

I dunno...I must be THE ONLY PERSON IN THE WORLD who possibly thinks I would rather see MY TAX DOLLARS SPENT RIGHT HERE IN THE USA to improve our damaged infrastructure. Sure, things are being put back together in our damaged areas....very slowly. Sure would be going a bit faster with a few hundred billion more dontcha think ;-) ?

Perhaps President Bush plans on relocating many of the displaced that lost their homes and businesses there to IRAQ instead? Perhaps IRAQ is destined to become the 51st State?

Who would dare say our President doesn't have our priorities at heart, or say he seemingly doesn't like to focus too much on Domestic policy making and management?

Where the helsinki is all this $$$ coming from...or going to come from to pay for these...uh...so called...domestic and international follies...er... policies?

2007-01-02 03:38:20 · 18 answers · asked by Middy S 2

explain your answer carefully and in full, however, be very sensitive on this extraordinary subject of great importance. We all want to know why you people feel this way.

2007-01-02 03:38:05 · 12 answers · asked by romaniascott 4

What I mean is who decided what rules to include? Was it the builder? A group of citizens? An HOA office at the city? It seems like all HOAs have the same rules, which indicates to me that it's not a democratic process but a commercial one, where the builders/developers create them. Any ideas how they are originated?

2007-01-02 03:18:50 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

THE EVIDENCE PROOVE'S IT. _The WTC tower's were destroyed in a Controlled Demolition. _There were no hijacker's, the airliner's were computer-controlled. _A plane DID'NT hit the Pentagon. United Airlines Flight 93 DID'NT crash in Pennsylvania. QUESTIONS: Why was the steel from the tower's immeadiately taken out of the country? Why has no investigation into 9/11 been conducted? Why has George W. Bush done everything in his power to make sure no investigation is held? Why is there no proof that any of these ''hijackers'' were on any of these flights? Why was there no irrefutable trace of Flight 77's wreckage out side the Pentagon? Where are the Black Box recorder's from Flight 77 and Flight 93? Why did NORAD make no attempt to intercept the airliners? Why did the US government ignore warnings from 15 different country's prior to 9/11? Why has no-one been held accountable? There are countless other questions, and they DEMAND ANSWERS. Why are we being lied to? What are they hiding from us?

2007-01-02 03:10:39 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-02 03:04:36 · 5 answers · asked by alicia a 1

2007-01-02 03:01:37 · 13 answers · asked by William H 1

Maybe some of the Ford family members being from Michigan realize & acknowledge the level of poverty in America 2007 being orchestraighted yet ignored by the ruling class & todays puppet politicians!

2007-01-02 03:00:00 · 5 answers · asked by bulabate 6

This will allow twice that number to enter the country as their 'sponsored guests' This will be enacted by Washington without a public vote. **Do you approve of this?** IF NOT! Please write ,Congress, The Senate, The White House and Very Importantly The Media to object. Once these Bills/Laws are passed they're nearly impossible to reverse.

2007-01-02 02:54:23 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Always wear suits with one or two buttons on the front of the jacket? You never see one with a double breasted jacket. Why? Is this some sort of standard uniform for them or what?

2007-01-02 02:53:51 · 7 answers · asked by DialM4Speed 6

I personally think it was Castro

2007-01-02 02:48:42 · 17 answers · asked by stupid_blonde_from_hell 1

I think so....now, I'll never believe a word he has to say.

2007-01-02 02:48:11 · 13 answers · asked by bradxschuman 6

I saw a commercial on Fox News where they wished everyone "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas". Are they part of the S-P movement? Will O'Reilly leave the network in protest and return to the gossip show Inside Edition?

2007-01-02 02:36:30 · 7 answers · asked by . 4

Please be specific and try to refrain from 2nd grade silly attacks.

2007-01-02 02:35:11 · 8 answers · asked by Cool_Hand_Newman 1

When everyday so many young americans die in iraq and other parts of the world. We dont close govt offices everytime a soldier dies, We dont raise the flag 1/2 way everytime a father loses his daughter. We dont have a state funeral everytime a mother loses her son.

2007-01-02 02:20:09 · 15 answers · asked by gamereaper3 3

Please dont just answer "its a lefty conspiracy" I understand that some people feel that way.
I want to know what specific gain political or otherwise that someone would get by promoting Global warming if it was a hoax.

Im pretty sure Al Gore is not running for the White house so I cant see it availing him any thing
Any soloution for global warming would be alternate energy sources, and its not like the oil companies are helping us any, and it would actually be harmful to the oil terrorist nations.

I am looking for an actual motive for why someone would use this as a tool for some kind of gain.

2007-01-02 02:17:58 · 12 answers · asked by gdeach 3

2007-01-02 02:07:18 · 7 answers · asked by madous77 1

What does Washington have on his side in To His Excellency, General Washington?

Knowledge.
Virtue.
The people.

2007-01-02 01:55:15 · 2 answers · asked by thisxlifexisntxrealx2006 2

2007-01-02 01:48:43 · 7 answers · asked by teetzijo 3

fedest.com, questions and answers