Other - Politics & Government - November 2006

For God's sake! They haven't even convened yet!!! They won't until January. Republicans literally PROVE without a doubt that they, with their false ideas about the democratic agenda, have no idea what democrats plan to do.
My advice is for them to give democrats a chance. A chance, the same way democrats gave Bush a chance before he wore out his welcome. Just chill out and wait till January. OK?

2006-11-10 11:05:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

first off, there is no group called "the terrorists"... so who exactly are these people and what is the name of the group that will be attacking and taking over Iraq... where will they come from... where are they now (a huge army amassed along the border somewhere waiting for us to leave?)

I don't really get the logistics of terrorists taking over iraq and how that would happen...

al-queda is mostly destroyed according to Bush and Rummy... were they lying? they shouldn't be able to do anything near taking over a country...

the current elected government of Iraq is very Iran friendly... why would Iran attack if the current elected government is more than happy to work with them now? you don't need to attack people who agree with you and think the same way you do.

I just don't really get the logistics of how terrorists, who ever they are, could take over a country, especially since Iraq has several thousand trained/armed army troops, according to the goverment.

how would it work?

2006-11-10 10:58:43 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

For what reasons

2006-11-10 10:58:02 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 10:22:49 · 8 answers · asked by brandiamour 2

hurry and answer

2006-11-10 10:10:36 · 2 answers · asked by Jesus Freak 2

Were these emblems once upon a time chosen by leaders of the given party, or by critical print editorials? How is the Republican party like an elephant? How is the Democratic party like a donkey? More to the point, what influenced the creative minds in question to compare the parties to these beasts? When were these parties originally equated to their respective animal emblems?

2006-11-10 09:30:13 · 11 answers · asked by warped_factor_ten 2

With the many issues being debated by Rep and Dem and Ind, it's hard to take a stand and agree with one party about every single issue. I have some Dem views and some Rep views, but I vote for the person who sees my view of one major issue. The others are more minor to me.
What major views keep you Democrat or Republican or neither? abortion, the environment, gun control, health care, etc...

2006-11-10 09:18:56 · 12 answers · asked by LadyMagick 5

Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. I dont see it am I wrong?

2006-11-10 09:13:54 · 14 answers · asked by rebel_slash_hippy 2

or is it just me but is life getting harder all you get these days is give give give ???????????

2006-11-10 09:02:46 · 25 answers · asked by sinedj2005 1

Do you think the U.S. would be better off staying out of foreign affairs? People like Monroe thought that we should leave other people alone, and warned that they should leave us alone.

Do you think this would work in today's world? Would it benefit or harm the U.S.? Just curious here as to what you think...

2006-11-10 08:55:11 · 5 answers · asked by Josh 5

Please leave aside all religious arguments and tell me why, legally, you believe that marriage should only be between one man and one woman? Why not two men or two women or two women and one man? Why must it be so specifically one of each?

2006-11-10 08:43:08 · 24 answers · asked by Phaylynn 5

What kind of changes can i expect in the next few years?
i.e. taxes, economy, schools, foriegn affairs, ect.

2006-11-10 08:41:29 · 10 answers · asked by 7yler Stone 1

And to say no, would mean your criticism of the democratic government is premature. Definitely premature, because the democratic Congress has not even convened yet. And not to mention, republicans nationwide literally prove they have no idea what the agenda of the democrats is.
My advice is for everyone to be fair and patient, and to not jump to conclusions about what democrats will do.

2006-11-10 08:34:09 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hate speech laws would limit freedom of speech to certain groups as the kkk and others that preach hate.

what do you think would be the consequeces if we had such laws in america ?

2006-11-10 08:21:48 · 11 answers · asked by IRunWithScissors 3

For once, Bush gives democrats the credit they deserve.
In a recent interview he said that after talking with the new Congress to convene in January, Bush said democrats are equally patriotic as republicans.
Democrats, as well as republicans, have loved this great nation their entire lives because of the freedom and admirable American ideals.
Democrats never question the republicans' support of the US.
Republicans need to understand that the fact is, both parties are equally patriotic but simply have different ideas about how to run the nation.

2006-11-10 08:18:11 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Also , will public molestation be allowed if the child is 10 and it is consensual?

Can molestion take place under democratic supervision if parents are not available for consent?

2006-11-10 08:11:03 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Also , will public molestation be allowed if the child is 10 and it is consensual?

Can molestion take place under democratic supervision if parents are not available for consent?

2006-11-10 08:07:42 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

try to think about it before you answer.

2006-11-10 07:54:28 · 20 answers · asked by dbobb 3

and rightly so.

its about time everyone took a step back from the racist accusations and listened to what the BNP has to say.

They only say what everyone else is afraid to.

now Gordon Brown says the law may have to be changed because they were found not guilty.

well they were found not guilty in a British court of law by a jury......... so stick that where the sun doesnt shine Mr Brown

2006-11-10 07:54:02 · 26 answers · asked by ♥gigi♥ 7

And the fact that they have a history of raising taxes is not proof.
Also, why do republicans think Rangel is one of the most important democrats? He simply said he wouldn't extend the tax cuts in 2010. He didn't say he would raise taxes. On top of that, Pelosi and Reid have already stated maybe a thousand times that the plan is to reverse the tax cuts for the 1% richest Americans and help the middle class and poor with the rising cost of living. If you don't believe Pelosi and Reid, you are not believing the truth. And that's not our fault.

2006-11-10 07:46:34 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

If we can't say what we want and believe..............

2006-11-10 07:43:38 · 16 answers · asked by Susie2 4

need to find the website for cleveland, ohio housing authority, is there anybody who knows and can help?

2006-11-10 07:34:36 · 1 answers · asked by orlandoman16508 2

Anything? http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts09302006.html

2006-11-10 07:33:32 · 3 answers · asked by city_shuffle 2

2006-11-10 07:06:22 · 7 answers · asked by aj 4

i heard that ssd only pay for 12 months even if i waited for two year's for my benifits is this true i have been waiting for 20 month's i'am under reconsideration now?

2006-11-10 06:58:32 · 1 answers · asked by mishoney 4

The MI5 In england has 1600 suspects on their watch list, and 30 plots. Do you have to be a citizen of england to be apart of the MI5?

2006-11-10 06:40:44 · 2 answers · asked by browningny 1

As could be expected from the Dems and their partner in crime, Al Qaida, they are both hailing the elections as a defeat to the war effort in Iraq. Just recently Al Qaida released a tape praising the results by stating "The American people have put their feet on the right path by ... realizing their president's betrayal in supporting Israel," the terror leader said. "So they voted for something reasonable in the last elections."

Al Qaida has also said that they are winning the war in Iraq, much like the Dems.

Is anyone else concerned about the fact that Republicans have been warning that the Dems are content with losing the war and allowing Al Qaida to kill more innocent Americans? Is anyone concerned that Al Qaida is happy about the recent election results? Every other election they were pissed that Republicans kept control. Not this time.

Please read the article and respond.
http://articles.news.aol.com/news/_a/purported-al-qaida-tape-praises-us/20061110113009990008

2006-11-10 06:27:25 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Lays me down with my mind he runs,
Throughout the night,
No need to fight,
Never a frown with Gordon Brown.

2006-11-10 05:59:03 · 5 answers · asked by schmagum 4

In the event of the war in Iraq being a total failure (fragmented Iraq), and as a result of the carnage it has caused, the hundreds of thousands killed by the bombing, the destruction of the country, due to the fact that the war was illegal in the first place and not sanctioned by the U.N., should the World Court in the Hague bring criminal proceedings against the instigators of the war, i.e. Bush, Blair, and other political leaders involved?
I think there's a huge public perception out there that those responsible will have to answer for their crimes.

2006-11-10 05:56:13 · 5 answers · asked by wondering human 2

5th correct answer gets the best answer designation.

2006-11-10 05:32:12 · 7 answers · asked by Paul C 2