Some people believe Bush and his cabal are just a bunch of greedy thieves and liars.
I wonder if Haliburton and Cheney were not such an item in this war, if they hadn't both been oil men, if they had been constitutional lawyers for example instead of oil men, do you think that you could trust them a little bit more and maybe give them the benefit of the doubt?
If so, with Bush's poll ratings so low and so many people against the war, which undermines the troops as they say, wouldn't the resignation of Bush and Cheney do a lot to increase our support for the war by giving us someone we could trust?
Would that mean that Bush was actually the one undermining the troops?
What would Bush have to do to prove his honesty and integrity to win back the trust of the American people?
If he had our trust couldn't he be a better leader and a more effective commander in chief?
Richard Nixon resigned when people thought he was a crook and he couldn't govern. Shouldn't Bush do the same?
2006-09-11
12:30:43
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous