It is a proven fact that the Bush and Bin Laden families are close friends. Kind of makes the official 9/11 story smell kind of fishy. Americans have got to face up to the fact that the guy had nothing to do with it, and we're just being fed a big bunch of B.S. Makes you wonder what else is going on behind our backs that we know nothing about.
2006-09-11 13:45:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by oceansoflight777 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
If the "news happening now" on Fox sent across the scrawl that Osama was caught and killed, just how different would anyones life be upon hearing the "news"?
Would you not go to work? Would you not send your kids to school that day? Would you not stop and get bread, milk, and lunch meat at the store on your way home? Do you still need to get school shoes for the kids? Mow the lawn? Take the car in for an oil change? Take out the garbage? Cancel weekend plans with the family? Would you "feel safer"?
Not a damn thing would happen that made that day any different than the rest.
Ten minutes after hearing the news, its a non-event.
Scaring Americans has more bang to the buck than reassuring them.
2006-09-11 14:17:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by navymom 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your heritage lesson isn't truly precise. Woodrow Wilson replaced into President from 1913 to 1921. international conflict a million began in July 1914 with out direct involvement of the country Wilson signed the Selective service Act (draft, conscription) in may 1917 American troops were no longer deployed into the trenches of Europe till the summer season of 1918 The conflict led to November 1918 possibly a more desirable proper question is: What might want to have occurred if Obama did not enable military Seals to kill Osama Bin encumbered, understanding that the CIA replaced into attentive to Bin encumbered's area for 6 months previous to the raid? hiya invoice O'Reilly and all different information Media pundits: the position is the "braveness" in that?
2016-11-26 02:09:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
okay, dumbass. Bin Laden is LIKED over there and has LOTS of help. IF he isn't already dead, he's hiding in caves. Do you know how many caves there probably are? Probably not. The military cannot just watch the whole Earth through satellite, they have to be able to pinpoint the place. Obviously you have no military knowledge except for what you were *told*, so don't speak about something you don't know about. I laugh at people like you
This it too the twist below me, you are a stupid ******* *****, and for you to EVEN mouth off about the military like that you should be ashamed! My boyfriend is a Marine, as is my brother in law and you have some nerve to say that is what they do. You are going to hell
2006-09-11 13:40:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I personally do not believe that OBL or Zawahiri are anywhere that satellite imagery can succinctly find and identify them. As they come into regular public forums (as Zawahiri did earlier this year), the intelligence has to be timely and reliable (it was one not the other, and we missed Zawahiri). OBL represents an icon in the Islamic jihad against the West. So long as he's alive and breathing, there's a symbol to place before the jihadists, ensuring them their side has not and cannot be defeated. So they know this, and keep OBL as far away from any form of civilization possible. He's got millions upon millions and can hide for decades, likely, unless we're willing to flatten the border mountain ranges between Pakistan and Afghanistan, or we're willing to send tens of thousands of troops in climatically and militarily hostile territory to find one figurehead.
I think Zawahiri's comments today on attacks in the Gulf or Israel sound like desperate ploys to garner attention and relevance. These comments are not likely to instill a patriotic fervor in the Gulf states and may backfire if/when the kings and emirs of the Gulf decide they are tired of placating radicals in their countries and crack down on the extreme elements in their countries.
There is no evidence to suggest that the President and OBL ever met, let alone developed a friendship. True the Bushes and Bin Ladens have had ties in the past, as have the Bushes and most anyone who has any power in Saudi Arabia. Perhaps leaving OBL alive allows the government to point to a physical symbol of terrorism to keep the enemy fresh in the public's mind. For that, I'd say look at the videos and photos of 9/11. That's enough to make my blood boil.
The U.S. military caught Noriega, Saddam, Zarqawi and a host of other morons who thought they could thumb their noses at the U.S. From a force distribution and risk/reward standpoint, I'd rather see more forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan than in Iraq. But only because that is a more urgent requirement...Iraq is more important, long term, because freely elected and democratic governments are what is needed to bring moderate Islam out of its clamshell. It would be cheaper and wiser to let Zawahiri and OBL die for lack of proper medical care or to the elements, than to send thousands of troops on a wild goose chase (the bombing thing rarely works).
Musharraf refuses to allow US troops on his side of the border to squeeze the Al Qaeda elements within Pakistan, providing comfort and aide to OBL and his cohorts. For now, I'd say OBL is rendered militarily defunct and contained (just like Saddam was, so why the Democrats are complaining now is beyond me). There is no friendship between America and OBL, not now, not ever. The war is to free the average Muslim from the education and upbringing of ignorance and hate. To welcome the Islamic outlands to the global society. They will fight, some will, but the rest will also interact and engage with the rest of the world, and make the natural preference of life over death.
2006-09-11 13:54:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by rohannesian 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bin Laden is no longer the serious issue that he was. He is hiding in a bunker and does not have access, communications and the wealth to conduct terrorist operations that he once did.
In a way it would be nice to catch him but I fear the day that we do. I believe the Liberals will use this as an excuse to stop the war on terror. It never was a war on Bin Laden or Al Quaida, it is a war on terror. We must completely destroy the enemy, he will not negotiate or soften because we make nice, he means to kill us and has said so. We cannot leave this war like we did Vietnam, this one will follow us.
2006-09-11 13:41:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think AMerica's Military should start practicing to capture Osama on our Southern Border. If they can capture every single Illegal that attempts to enter the US. Then will be ready to capture Osama. BUT CRAP they can't train that way cause the Hypocrites in Mexico only think they should be allowed to use troops on there Southern Border. O well Maybe after we remove all the Pro Illegals in DC we will get some people in there that will allow our Military to train by capturing Illegals. Then we can catch Osama.
2006-09-11 13:41:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Puleeze, do you honestly think that? You have stood too close to the microwave for too long. Bin Laden is being protected and since our media and all left wing liberals tell all our secrets I am sure he has complete knowledge of our movements. I think Bin laden is either in Pakistan or Iran.
2006-09-11 13:39:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The U.S Government has already sent Bin Laden to meet his so called 72 virgins. You may be next. I will make sure your name gets added to the terrorist watch list.
2006-09-11 14:04:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's dead, dumbass. Have you seen him lately? You can't be so gullible as to belive Rag-head radio.
I think you're too damn dumb to tie your own shoes. You are a slanderer and a liar. Your mouth is not a fit place for the President's name. You seem to be an enemy of my country, too. I'm tired of you and your kind.
2006-09-11 13:41:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋